Literature DB >> 23828602

Acetic acid inhibits nutrient uptake in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: auxotrophy confounds the use of yeast deletion libraries for strain improvement.

Jun Ding1, Jan Bierma, Mark R Smith, Eric Poliner, Carole Wolfe, Alex N Hadduck, Severino Zara, Mallori Jirikovic, Kari van Zee, Michael H Penner, Jana Patton-Vogt, Alan T Bakalinsky.   

Abstract

Acetic acid inhibition of yeast fermentation has a negative impact in several industrial processes. As an initial step in the construction of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain with increased tolerance for acetic acid, mutations conferring resistance were identified by screening a library of deletion mutants in a multiply auxotrophic genetic background. Of the 23 identified mutations, 11 were then introduced into a prototrophic laboratory strain for further evaluation. Because none of the 11 mutations was found to increase resistance in the prototrophic strain, potential interference by the auxotrophic mutations themselves was investigated. Mutants carrying single auxotrophic mutations were constructed and found to be more sensitive to growth inhibition by acetic acid than an otherwise isogenic prototrophic strain. At a concentration of 80 mM acetic acid at pH 4.8, the initial uptake of uracil, leucine, lysine, histidine, tryptophan, phosphate, and glucose was lower in the prototrophic strain than in a non-acetic acid-treated control. These findings are consistent with two mechanisms by which nutrient uptake may be inhibited. Intracellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP) levels were severely decreased upon acetic acid treatment, which likely slowed ATP-dependent proton symport, the major form of transport in yeast for nutrients other than glucose. In addition, the expression of genes encoding some nutrient transporters was repressed by acetic acid, including HXT1 and HXT3 that encode glucose transporters that operate by facilitated diffusion. These results illustrate how commonly used genetic markers in yeast deletion libraries complicate the effort to isolate strains with increased acetic acid resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23828602     DOI: 10.1007/s00253-013-5071-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0175-7598            Impact factor:   4.813


  16 in total

1.  Failure to Maintain Acetate Homeostasis by Acetate-Activating Enzymes Impacts Plant Development.

Authors:  Xinyu Fu; Hannah Yang; Febriana Pangestu; Basil J Nikolau
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  PEP3 overexpression shortens lag phase but does not alter growth rate in Saccharomyces cerevisiae exposed to acetic acid stress.

Authors:  Jun Ding; Garrett Holzwarth; C Samuel Bradford; Ben Cooley; Allen S Yoshinaga; Jana Patton-Vogt; Hagai Abeliovich; Michael H Penner; Alan T Bakalinsky
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Auxotrophic Mutations Reduce Tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Very High Levels of Ethanol Stress.

Authors:  Steve Swinnen; Annelies Goovaerts; Kristien Schaerlaekens; Françoise Dumortier; Pieter Verdyck; Kris Souvereyns; Griet Van Zeebroeck; María R Foulquié-Moreno; Johan M Thevelein
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2015-06-26

4.  Overexpression of acetyl-CoA synthetase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae increases acetic acid tolerance.

Authors:  Jun Ding; Garrett Holzwarth; Michael H Penner; Jana Patton-Vogt; Alan T Bakalinsky
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 2.742

5.  Death by a thousand cuts: the challenges and diverse landscape of lignocellulosic hydrolysate inhibitors.

Authors:  Jeff S Piotrowski; Yaoping Zhang; Donna M Bates; David H Keating; Trey K Sato; Irene M Ong; Robert Landick
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  RNA-Seq-based transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis reveal stress responses and programmed cell death induced by acetic acid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Yachen Dong; Jingjin Hu; Linlin Fan; Qihe Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Engineering tolerance to industrially relevant stress factors in yeast cell factories.

Authors:  Quinten Deparis; Arne Claes; Maria R Foulquié-Moreno; Johan M Thevelein
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  A new laboratory evolution approach to select for constitutive acetic acid tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and identification of causal mutations.

Authors:  Daniel González-Ramos; Arthur R Gorter de Vries; Sietske S Grijseels; Margo C van Berkum; Steve Swinnen; Marcel van den Broek; Elke Nevoigt; Jean-Marc G Daran; Jack T Pronk; Antonius J A van Maris
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 6.040

9.  Endogenous lycopene improves ethanol production under acetic acid stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Shuo Pan; Bin Jia; Hong Liu; Zhen Wang; Meng-Zhe Chai; Ming-Zhu Ding; Xiao Zhou; Xia Li; Chun Li; Bing-Zhi Li; Ying-Jin Yuan
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 6.040

Review 10.  Sodium Acetate Responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the Ubiquitin Ligase Rsp5.

Authors:  Akaraphol Watcharawipas; Daisuke Watanabe; Hiroshi Takagi
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.