Literature DB >> 33086312

Low anti-Factor Xa level predicts 90-day Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism in Surgical Patients Receiving Enoxaparin Prophylaxis: A Pooled Analysis of Eight Clinical Trials.

Christopher J Pannucci1, Kory I Fleming2, Thomas K Varghese3, John Stringham3, Lyen C Huang4, T Bartley Pickron4, Ann Marie Prazak5, Corinne Bertolaccini5, Arash Momeni6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between enoxaparin dose adequacy, quantified with anti-Factor Xa (aFXa) levels, and 90-day symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) and post-operative bleeding. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical patients often develop "breakthrough" VTE events-those which occur despite receiving chemical anticoagulation. We hypothesize that surgical patients with low aFXa levels will be more likely to develop 90-day VTE, and those with high aFXa will be more likely to bleed.
METHODS: Pooled analysis of eight clinical trials (N = 985) from a single institution over a four year period. Patients had peak steady state aFXa levels in response to a known initial enoxaparin dose, and were followed for 90 days. Survival analysis log-rank test examined associations between aFXa level category and 90-day symptomatic VTE & bleeding.
RESULTS: Among 985 patients, 2.3% (n = 23) had symptomatic 90-day VTE, 4.2% (n = 41) had 90-day clinically relevant bleeding, and 2.1% (n = 21) had major bleeding. Patients with initial low aFXa were significantly more likely to have 90-day VTE than patients with adequate or high aFXa (4.2% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.007). In a stratified analysis, this relationship was significant for patients who received twice daily (6.2% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.003), but not once daily (3.0% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.10) enoxaparin. No association was seen between high aFXa and 90-day clinically relevant bleeding (4.8% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.34) or major bleeding (3.6% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.18).
CONCLUSIONS: This manuscript establishes inadequate enoxaparin dosing as a plausible mechanism for breakthrough VTE in surgical patients, and identifies anticoagulant dose adequacy as a novel target for process improvement measures.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33086312      PMCID: PMC8639105          DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  49 in total

1.  Effectiveness and safety of extended-duration prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in major urologic oncology surgery.

Authors:  Janet E Baack Kukreja; Helen R Levey; Emil Scosyrev; Maureen Kiernan; Claudia Berrondo; Carrie McNamee; Guan Wu; Jean V Joseph; Ahmed Ghazi; Hani Rashid; Ann Dozier; Edward M Messing
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.498

2.  If some is good, more is better: An enoxaparin dosing strategy to improve pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.

Authors:  Allison E Berndtson; Todd W Costantini; James Lane; Kevin Box; Raul Coimbra
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.313

3.  Postoperative enoxaparin prevents symptomatic venous thromboembolism in high-risk plastic surgery patients.

Authors:  Christopher J Pannucci; George Dreszer; Christine Fisher Wachtman; Steven H Bailey; Pamela R Portschy; Jennifer B Hamill; Keith M Hume; Ronald E Hoxworth; J Peter Rubin; Loree K Kalliainen; Andrea L Pusic; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Chemoprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in otolaryngology.

Authors:  Vinita Bahl; Andrew G Shuman; Hsou Mei Hu; Christopher R Jackson; Christopher J Pannucci; Cesar Alaniz; Douglas B Chepeha; Carol R Bradford
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 6.223

Review 5.  The rate of bleeding complications after pharmacologic deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis: a systematic review of 33 randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Michael J Leonardi; Marcia L McGory; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2006-08

6.  The relationship between anti-factor Xa level and clinical outcome in patients receiving enoxaparine low molecular weight heparin to prevent deep vein thrombosis after hip replacement.

Authors:  M N Levine; A Planes; J Hirsh; M Goodyear; N Vochelle; M Gent
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  1989-11-24       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 7.  Utility of anti-factor Xa monitoring in surgical patients receiving prophylactic doses of enoxaparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.

Authors:  Christopher J Pannucci; Ann Marie Prazak; Melody Scheefer
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Alternative dosing of prophylactic enoxaparin in the trauma patient: is more the answer?

Authors:  Tammy R Kopelman; Patrick J O'Neill; Paola G Pieri; Jeffrey P Salomone; Scott T Hall; Asia Quan; Jordan R Wells; Melissa S Pressman
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Improved prophylaxis and decreased rates of preventable harm with the use of a mandatory computerized clinical decision support tool for prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in trauma.

Authors:  Elliott R Haut; Brandyn D Lau; Franca S Kraenzlin; Deborah B Hobson; Peggy S Kraus; Howard T Carolan; Adil H Haider; Christine G Holzmueller; David T Efron; Peter J Pronovost; Michael B Streiff
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2012-10

10.  Twice-Daily Enoxaparin among Plastic Surgery Inpatients: An Examination of Pharmacodynamics, 90-Day Venous Thromboembolism, and 90-Day Bleeding.

Authors:  Christopher J Pannucci; Kory I Fleming; Arash Momeni; Ann Marie Prazak; Jayant Agarwal; W Bradford Rockwell
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.730

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.