OBJECTIVE: Venous thromboembolism is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality and is largely preventable. Despite this fact, appropriate prophylaxis is vastly underutilized. To improve compliance with best practice prophylaxis for VTE in hospitalized trauma patients, we implemented a mandatory computerized provider order entry-based clinical decision support tool. The system required completion of checklists of VTE risk factors and contraindications to pharmacologic prophylaxis. With this tool, we were able to determine a patient's risk stratification level and recommend appropriate prophylaxis. To evaluate the effect of our mandatory computerized provider order entry-based clinical decision support tool on compliance with prophylaxis guidelines for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and VTE outcomes among admitted adult trauma patients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study (from January 2007 through December 2010). SETTING: University-based, state-designated level 1 adult trauma center. PATIENTS: A total of 1599 hospitalized adult trauma patients with a hospital length of stay greater than 1 day. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients who were ordered risk-appropriate guideline-suggested VTE prophylaxis. The secondary outcome measure was the proportion of patients with any preventable VTE (defined as VTE in a patient not ordered guideline-appropriate VTE prophylaxis), pulmonary embolism, and/or deep vein thrombosis. RESULTS: Compliance with guideline-appropriate prophylaxis increased from 66.2% to 84.4% (P < .001). The rate of preventable harm from VTE decreased from 1.0% to 0.17% (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a mandatory computerized provider order entry-based clinical decision support tool significantly improved compliance with VTE prophylaxis guidelines in hospitalized adult trauma patients. This improved compliance was associated with a significant decrease in the rate of preventable harm, which was defined as VTE events in patients not ordered appropriate prophylaxis.
OBJECTIVE:Venous thromboembolism is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality and is largely preventable. Despite this fact, appropriate prophylaxis is vastly underutilized. To improve compliance with best practice prophylaxis for VTE in hospitalized traumapatients, we implemented a mandatory computerized provider order entry-based clinical decision support tool. The system required completion of checklists of VTE risk factors and contraindications to pharmacologic prophylaxis. With this tool, we were able to determine a patient's risk stratification level and recommend appropriate prophylaxis. To evaluate the effect of our mandatory computerized provider order entry-based clinical decision support tool on compliance with prophylaxis guidelines for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and VTE outcomes among admitted adult traumapatients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study (from January 2007 through December 2010). SETTING: University-based, state-designated level 1 adult trauma center. PATIENTS: A total of 1599 hospitalized adult traumapatients with a hospital length of stay greater than 1 day. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients who were ordered risk-appropriate guideline-suggested VTE prophylaxis. The secondary outcome measure was the proportion of patients with any preventable VTE (defined as VTE in a patient not ordered guideline-appropriate VTE prophylaxis), pulmonary embolism, and/or deep vein thrombosis. RESULTS: Compliance with guideline-appropriate prophylaxis increased from 66.2% to 84.4% (P < .001). The rate of preventable harm from VTE decreased from 1.0% to 0.17% (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a mandatory computerized provider order entry-based clinical decision support tool significantly improved compliance with VTE prophylaxis guidelines in hospitalized adult traumapatients. This improved compliance was associated with a significant decrease in the rate of preventable harm, which was defined as VTE events in patients not ordered appropriate prophylaxis.
Authors: Emily M Powers; Richard N Shiffman; Edward R Melnick; Andrew Hickner; Mona Sharifi Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Zachary C Dietch; Brandy L Edwards; Matthew Thames; Puja M Shah; Michael D Williams; Robert G Sawyer Journal: Surgery Date: 2015-05-29 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Megan E Salwei; Pascale Carayon; Ann S Hundt; Peter Hoonakker; Vaibhav Agrawal; Peter Kleinschmidt; Jason Stamm; Douglas Wiegmann; Brian W Patterson Journal: Ergonomics Date: 2019-04-30 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Caroline Pinto Thirukumaran; James G Dolan; Patricia Reagan Webster; Robert J Panzer; Bruce Friedman Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2014-06-26 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: M Francesca Monn; Xuan Hui; Brandyn D Lau; Michael Streiff; Elliott R Haut; Elizabeth C Wick; Jonathan E Efron; Susan L Gearhart Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Larry C Field; Matthew D McEvoy; Jeremy C Smalley; Carlee A Clark; Michael B McEvoy; Horst Rieke; Paul J Nietert; Cory M Furse Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2013-09-19 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Adil H Haider; Zain G Hashmi; Sonia Gupta; Syed Nabeel Zafar; Jean-Stephane David; David T Efron; Kent A Stevens; Hasnain Zafar; Eric B Schneider; Eric Voiglio; Raul Coimbra; Elliott R Haut Journal: World J Surg Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Kara L Piechowski; Stacy Elder; Leigh E Efird; Elliott R Haut; Michael B Streiff; Brandyn D Lau; Peggy S Kraus; Cynthia S Rand; Victor O Popoola; Deborah B Hobson; Norma E Farrow; Dauryne Shaffer; Kenneth M Shermock Journal: J Thromb Thrombolysis Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 2.300