Literature DB >> 25275427

Chemoprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in otolaryngology.

Vinita Bahl1, Andrew G Shuman2, Hsou Mei Hu1, Christopher R Jackson3, Christopher J Pannucci4, Cesar Alaniz5, Douglas B Chepeha2, Carol R Bradford2.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) causes significant morbidity and mortality in surgical patients. Despite strong evidence that thromboprophylaxis reduces the incidence VTE, guidelines for prophylaxis in otolaryngology are not well established. Key to the development of VTE prophylaxis recommendations are effective VTE risk stratification and evaluation of the benefits and harms of prophylaxis.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of VTE chemoprophylaxis among a population of otolaryngology patients stratified by risk. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study of 3498 adult patients admitted for otolaryngologic surgery at a single-institution academic tertiary care medical center between September 1, 2003, and June 30, 2010.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were stratified into 2 groups based on whether they received VTE chemoprophylaxis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Incidence of VTE and bleeding-related complications within 30 days after surgery.
RESULTS: Of 1482 patients receiving VTE chemoprophylaxis, 18 (1.2%) developed a VTE compared with 27 of 2016 patients (1.3%) who did not receive prophylaxis (P = .75). Patients with Caprini VTE risk scores greater than 7 were less likely to have a VTE with perioperative chemoprophylaxis (5.3% vs 10.4%; P = .06). Of patients with VTE chemoprophylaxis, 3.5% developed a bleeding complication compared with 1.2% of patients without prophylaxis (P < .001). Bleeding complications were associated with concomitant use of antiplatelet medications and chemoprophylaxis. Among patients undergoing free tissue transfer, chemoprophylaxis significantly decreased the incidence of VTE (2.1% vs 7.7%; P = .002) and increased bleeding complications (11.9% vs 4.5%; P = .01). In all other patients, VTE chemoprophylaxis did not significantly influence the likelihood of VTE (1.0% vs 0.6%; P = .12) or bleeding (1.5% vs 0.9%; P = .15). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Effectiveness and safety of VTE chemoprophylaxis differed between patient subgroups, defined by Caprini risk score and by procedure. Effectiveness was most evident in patients with high Caprini risk scores and microvascular free tissue reconstruction. Bleeding complications were associated with VTE chemoprophylaxis administered in close proximity to potent antiplatelet therapy. The Caprini risk assessment model appears to be an effective tool to stratify otolaryngology patients by risk for VTE. Patients undergoing free tissue reconstruction merit further study before developing recommendations for VTE prophylaxis because of their higher risk of both VTE and bleeding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25275427     DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2014.2254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2168-6181            Impact factor:   6.223


  7 in total

Review 1.  Thromboprophylaxis in Head and Neck Microvascular Reconstruction.

Authors:  Manoj Abraham; Arvind Badhey; Shirley Hu; Sameep Kadakia; J K Rasamny; Augustine Moscatello; Yadranko Ducic
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2017-10-31

Review 2.  [Prophylaxis of venous thromboembolic events in head and neck surgery].

Authors:  B Höing; U W Geisthoff; C E Dempfle; S Lang; B A Stuck
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  Use of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism in Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zachary M Borab; Michael A Lanni; Michael G Tecce; Christopher J Pannucci; John P Fischer
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

4.  Low anti-Factor Xa level predicts 90-day Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism in Surgical Patients Receiving Enoxaparin Prophylaxis: A Pooled Analysis of Eight Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Christopher J Pannucci; Kory I Fleming; Thomas K Varghese; John Stringham; Lyen C Huang; T Bartley Pickron; Ann Marie Prazak; Corinne Bertolaccini; Arash Momeni
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Risk of Venous Thromboembolism Among Otolaryngology Patients vs General Surgery and Plastic Surgery Patients.

Authors:  John D Cramer; Amanda E Dilger; Alex Schneider; Stephanie Shintani Smith; Sandeep Samant; Urjeet A Patel
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 6.223

Review 6.  Venous thromboembolism in head and neck cancer surgery.

Authors:  Faisal I Ahmad; Daniel R Clayburgh
Journal:  Cancers Head Neck       Date:  2016-11-01

7.  Clinical Factors Associated With Reoperation and Prolonged Length of Stay in Free Tissue Transfer to Oncologic Head and Neck Defects.

Authors:  William W Thomas; Jason Brant; Jinbo Chen; Orly Coblens; John P Fischer; Jason G Newman; Ara A Chalian; Rabie M Shanti; Steven B Cannady
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.611

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.