Literature DB >> 20838969

Bayesian methods in virtual screening and chemical biology.

Andreas Bender1.   

Abstract

The Naïve Bayesian Classifier, as well as related classification and regression approaches based on Bayes' theorem, has experienced increased attention in the cheminformatics world in recent years. In this contribution, we first review the mathematical framework on which Bayes' methods are built, and then continue to discuss implications of this framework as well as practical experience under which conditions Bayes' methods give the best performance in virtual screening settings. Finally, we present an overview of applications of Bayes' methods to both virtual screening and the chemical biology arena, where applications range from bridging phenotypic and mechanistic space of drug action to the prediction of ligand-target interactions.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20838969     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-60761-839-3_7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  11 in total

1.  Discovery of Influenza A virus neuraminidase inhibitors using support vector machine and Naïve Bayesian models.

Authors:  Wenwen Lian; Jiansong Fang; Chao Li; Xiaocong Pang; Ai-Lin Liu; Guan-Hua Du
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 2.943

Review 2.  Exploring chemical space for drug discovery using the chemical universe database.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Reymond; Mahendra Awale
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 4.418

3.  Comparing Multiple Machine Learning Algorithms and Metrics for Estrogen Receptor Binding Prediction.

Authors:  Daniel P Russo; Kimberley M Zorn; Alex M Clark; Hao Zhu; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Machine Learning Models for Predicting Liver Toxicity.

Authors:  Jie Liu; Wenjing Guo; Sugunadevi Sakkiah; Zuowei Ji; Gokhan Yavas; Wen Zou; Minjun Chen; Weida Tong; Tucker A Patterson; Huixiao Hong
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

5.  Comparison of Machine Learning Models for the Androgen Receptor.

Authors:  Kimberley M Zorn; Daniel H Foil; Thomas R Lane; Wendy Hillwalker; David J Feifarek; Frank Jones; William D Klaren; Ashley M Brinkman; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Machine Learning Models for Estrogen Receptor Bioactivity and Endocrine Disruption Prediction.

Authors:  Kimberley M Zorn; Daniel H Foil; Thomas R Lane; Daniel P Russo; Wendy Hillwalker; David J Feifarek; Frank Jones; William D Klaren; Ashley M Brinkman; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Open Source Bayesian Models. 3. Composite Models for Prediction of Binned Responses.

Authors:  Alex M Clark; Krishna Dole; Sean Ekins
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Data driven polypharmacological drug design for lung cancer: analyses for targeting ALK, MET, and EGFR.

Authors:  Dilip Narayanan; Osman A B S M Gani; Franz X E Gruber; Richard A Engh
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 5.514

9.  SYBA: Bayesian estimation of synthetic accessibility of organic compounds.

Authors:  Milan Voršilák; Michal Kolář; Ivan Čmelo; Daniel Svozil
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 5.514

10.  Genome-Wide Locations of Potential Epimutations Associated with Environmentally Induced Epigenetic Transgenerational Inheritance of Disease Using a Sequential Machine Learning Prediction Approach.

Authors:  M Muksitul Haque; Lawrence B Holder; Michael K Skinner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.