Literature DB >> 30205136

Development of a curated Hershberger database.

P Browne1, N C Kleinstreuer2, P Ceger3, C Deisenroth4, N Baker5, K Markey6, R S Thomas4, R J Judson4, W Casey2.   

Abstract

A systematic literature review was conducted to identify Hershberger bioassays for ∼3200 chemicals including those used to validate the OECD/US EPA guideline assay, US EPA's chemicals screened for endocrine activity, and the library of chemicals run in US EPA 's ToxCast in vitro assays. For 134 chemicals that met pre-defined criteria, experimental results were extracted into a database used to characterize uncertainty in results and evaluate the concordance of the Hershberger assay with other in vivo rodent studies that measure androgen-responsive endpoints. Of 25 chemicals tested in >1 Hershberger study, 28% had disagreements between studies (i.e. ≥1 positive and ≥1 negative study), and of the 65 chemicals tested in Hershberger studies and other in vivo studies with androgen-responsive endpoints, 43% indicated disagreements, though in some cases these may be explained by differences in study designs or physiology of the animal model. Ultimately, 49 chemicals were identified with reproducible androgen pathway responses confirmed in ≥2 in vivo rodent studies that could be considered reference chemicals useful for validating alternative methods.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Androgenic; Anti-androgenic; Disruption; EDSP; Endocrine; Hershberger; Male reproduction; Reference chemical; Systematic review

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30205136      PMCID: PMC6711601          DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2018.08.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Toxicol        ISSN: 0890-6238            Impact factor:   3.143


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of Machine Learning Models for the Androgen Receptor.

Authors:  Kimberley M Zorn; Daniel H Foil; Thomas R Lane; Wendy Hillwalker; David J Feifarek; Frank Jones; William D Klaren; Ashley M Brinkman; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Quantification of the Uncertainties in Extrapolating From In Vitro Androgen Receptor Antagonism to In Vivo Hershberger Assay Endpoints and Adverse Reproductive Development in Male Rats.

Authors:  Leon E Gray; Johnathan R Furr; Christy S Lambright; Nicola Evans; Phillip C Hartig; Mary C Cardon; Vickie S Wilson; Andrew K Hotchkiss; Justin M Conley
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.109

3.  Mapping Mechanistic Pathways of Acute Oral Systemic Toxicity Using Chemical Structure and Bioactivity Measurements.

Authors:  Stephen W Edwards; Mark Nelms; Virginia K Hench; Jessica Ponder; Kristie Sullivan
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-03-07

Review 4.  A framework for establishing scientific confidence in new approach methodologies.

Authors:  Anna J van der Zalm; João Barroso; Patience Browne; Warren Casey; John Gordon; Tala R Henry; Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Anna B Lowit; Monique Perron; Amy J Clippinger
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 6.168

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.