Literature DB >> 33084114

The Evolving Field of Risk Communication.

Dominic Balog-Way1, Katherine McComas1, John Besley2.   

Abstract

The 40th Anniversary of the Society for Risk Analysis presents an apt time to step back and review the field of risk communication. In this review, we first evaluate recent debates over the field's current state and future directions. Our takeaway is that efforts to settle on a single, generic version of what constitutes risk communication will be less productive than an open-minded exploration of the multiple forms that comprise today's vibrant interdisciplinary field. We then review a selection of prominent cognitive, cultural, and social risk communication scholarship appearing in the published literature since 2010. Studies on trust in risk communication messengers continued to figure prominently, while new research directions emerged on the opportunities and critical challenges of enhancing transparency and using social media. Research on message attributes explored how conceptual insights particularly relating to framing, affective and emotional responses, and uncertainty might be operationalized to improve message effectiveness. Studies consistently demonstrated the importance of evaluation and how varying single attributes alone is unlikely to achieve desired results. Research on risk communication audiences advanced on risk perception and multiway engagement with notable interest in personal factors such as gender, race, age, and political orientation. We conclude by arguing that the field's interdisciplinary tradition should be further nurtured to drive the next evolutionary phase of risk communication research.
© 2020 The Authors. Risk Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Risk Analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Interdisciplinary; SRA anniversary; literature review; risk communication

Year:  2020        PMID: 33084114      PMCID: PMC7756860          DOI: 10.1111/risa.13615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  105 in total

1.  Narrative persuasion, causality, complex integration, and support for obesity policy.

Authors:  Jeff Niederdeppe; Michael A Shapiro; Hye Kyung Kim; Danielle Bartolo; Norman Porticella
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2013-07-05

2.  The constitution of risk communication in advanced liberal societies.

Authors:  Jamie K Wardman
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 3.  Risk/Benefit Communication about Food-A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  L J Frewer; A R H Fischer; M Brennan; D Bánáti; R Lion; R M Meertens; G Rowe; M Siegrist; W Verbeke; C M J L Vereijken
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 11.176

4.  Judgment and Decision Making.

Authors:  Baruch Fischhoff; Stephen B Broomell
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 24.137

5.  Cultural Theory's Contributions to Risk Analysis: A Thematic Review with Directions and Resources for Further Research.

Authors:  Branden B Johnson; Brendon Swedlow
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 4.000

6.  The informal European Parliamentary Working Group on Risk--history, remit, and future plans: a personal view.

Authors:  Ragnar E Löfstedt
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 4.000

7.  Pragmatic and (or) Constitutive? On the Foundations of Contemporary Risk Communication Research.

Authors:  Laura N Rickard
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2019-10-06       Impact factor: 4.000

8.  Modeling compliance with COVID-19 prevention guidelines: the critical role of trust in science.

Authors:  Nejc Plohl; Bojan Musil
Journal:  Psychol Health Med       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 9.  Communicating uncertainty about facts, numbers and science.

Authors:  Anne Marthe van der Bles; Sander van der Linden; Alexandra L J Freeman; James Mitchell; Ana B Galvao; Lisa Zaval; David J Spiegelhalter
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  The effects of communicating uncertainty on public trust in facts and numbers.

Authors:  Anne Marthe van der Bles; Sander van der Linden; Alexandra L J Freeman; David J Spiegelhalter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  11 in total

1.  Technical assistance in the field of risk communication.

Authors:  Laura Maxim; Mario Mazzocchi; Stephan Van den Broucke; Fabiana Zollo; Tobin Robinson; Claire Rogers; Domagoj Vrbos; Giorgia Zamariola; Anthony Smith
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-04-29

2.  Behavioral and Attitudinal Correlates of Trusted Sources of COVID-19 Vaccine Information in the US.

Authors:  Carl A Latkin; Lauren Dayton; Jacob R Miller; Grace Yi; Afareen Jaleel; Chikaodinaka C Nwosu; Cui Yang; Oluwaseun Falade-Nwulia
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-20

Review 3.  The Role of Recipient Characteristics in Health Video Communication Outcomes: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Daniel Adrian Lungu; Jo Røislien; Siri Wiig; Marie Therese Shortt; Francesca Ferrè; Siv Hilde Berg; Henriette Thune; Kolbjørn Kallesten Brønnick
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  The Effect of Risk Communication on Public Behavior to Non-Conventional Terrorism-Randomized Control Trial.

Authors:  Moran Bodas; Morel Ragoler; Yossi Rabby; Esther Krasner
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Is Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication as Effective as Vaccination for Preventing Virus Diffusion? Measuring the Impacts of Failure in CERC with MERS-CoV Outbreak in South Korea.

Authors:  Ho Young Yoon
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 4.302

6.  "Even We Are Confused": A Thematic Analysis of Professionals' Perceptions of Processed Foods and Challenges for Communication.

Authors:  Christina R Sadler; Terri Grassby; Kathryn Hart; Monique M Raats; Milka Sokolović; Lada Timotijevic
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-02-23

7.  Creating Effective, Evidence-Based Video Communication of Public Health Science (COVCOM Study): Protocol for a Sequential Mixed Methods Effect Study.

Authors:  Jo Røislien; Jane K O'Hara; Ionica Smeets; Kolbjørn Brønnick; Siv Hilde Berg; Marie Therese Shortt; Daniel Adrian Lungu; Henriette Thune; Siri Wiig
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2022-03-11

8.  Differences in comprehending and acting on pandemic health risk information: a qualitative study using mental models.

Authors:  Siv Hilde Berg; Marie Therese Shortt; Henriette Thune; Jo Røislien; Jane K O'Hara; Daniel Adrian Lungu; Siri Wiig
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 4.135

9.  Capturing the Interplay between Risk Perception and Social Media Posting to Support Risk Response and Decision Making.

Authors:  Huiyun Zhu; Kecheng Liu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Health authorities' health risk communication with the public during pandemics: a rapid scoping review.

Authors:  Siv Hilde Berg; Jane K O'Hara; Marie Therese Shortt; Henriette Thune; Kolbjørn Kallesten Brønnick; Daniel Adrian Lungu; Jo Røislien; Siri Wiig
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.