Literature DB >> 31337275

Judgment and Decision Making.

Baruch Fischhoff1, Stephen B Broomell2.   

Abstract

The science of judgment and decision making involves three interrelated forms of research: analysis of the decisions people face, description of their natural responses, and interventions meant to help them do better. After briefly introducing the field's intellectual foundations, we review recent basic research into the three core elements of decision making: judgment, or how people predict the outcomes that will follow possible choices; preference, or how people weigh those outcomes; and choice, or how people combine judgments and preferences to reach a decision. We then review research into two potential sources of behavioral heterogeneity: individual differences in decision-making competence and developmental changes across the life span. Next, we illustrate applications intended to improve individual and organizational decision making in health, public policy, intelligence analysis, and risk management. We emphasize the potential value of coupling analytical and behavioral research and having basic and applied research inform one another.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision making; history; judgment; preference; risk; uncertainty

Year:  2019        PMID: 31337275     DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol        ISSN: 0066-4308            Impact factor:   24.137


  10 in total

1.  Decision-making by cancer patients and the role of a counselling facility for complementary and alternative medicine: a cohort study.

Authors:  Lena Josfeld; Jutta Hübner; Vanessa Hack; Christian Keinki; Jens Büntzel
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 4.322

2.  Supporting Health and Medical Decision Making: Findings and Insights from Fuzzy-Trace Theory.

Authors:  Valerie F Reyna; Sarah Edelson; Bridget Hayes; David Garavito
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 2.749

3.  Cognitive bias and attitude distortion of a priority decision.

Authors:  Ola Svenson; Torun Lindholm Öjmyr; Sophia Appelbom; Freja Isohanni
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2022-06-08

4.  Optimism bias in understanding neonatal prognoses.

Authors:  Babina Nayak; Jee-Young Moon; Mimi Kim; Baruch Fischhoff; Marlyse F Haward
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 2.521

5.  From science to politics: COVID-19 information fatigue on YouTube.

Authors:  Chyun-Fung Shi; Matthew C So; Sophie Stelmach; Arielle Earn; David J D Earn; Jonathan Dushoff
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 4.135

6.  From reductive to generative crisis: businesspeople using polysemous justifications to make sense of COVID-19.

Authors:  Ioana Sendroiu
Journal:  Am J Cult Sociol       Date:  2022-01-19

7.  Viruses, Vaccines, and COVID-19: Explaining and Improving Risky Decision-making.

Authors:  Valerie F Reyna; David A Broniatowski; Sarah M Edelson
Journal:  J Appl Res Mem Cogn       Date:  2021-12-13

Review 8.  A Distributed Interactive Decision-Making Framework for Sustainable Career Development.

Authors:  Helen Hallpike; Gaëlle Vallée-Tourangeau; Beatrice Van der Heijden
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-16

9.  A Procedure for Eliciting Women's Preferences for Breast Cancer Screening Frequency.

Authors:  Emily Grayek; Yanran Yang; Baruch Fischhoff; Karen E Schifferdecker; Steven Woloshin; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana L Miglioretti; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 2.749

10.  The Evolving Field of Risk Communication.

Authors:  Dominic Balog-Way; Katherine McComas; John Besley
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.000

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.