| Literature DB >> 33081697 |
Wei Li1, Jia Liu1, Tong-Yi Huang2, Xian Zhong2, Dao-Peng Yang2, Xiao-Hua Xie2, Dong-Hong Liu1, Xiao-Yan Xie2, Bo-Wen Zhuang3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To explore the lesion outline and thermal field distribution of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and laser ablation (LA) in myocardial ablation in vitro.Entities:
Keywords: Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy; In vitro; Laser ablation; Radiofrequency ablation; Thermal field distribution
Year: 2020 PMID: 33081697 PMCID: PMC7576753 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-020-01735-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.298
Fig. 1a Photograph shows radiofrequency ablation (triangle) in porcine heart. Two thermocouple probes (asterisk) were placed at the same depth parallel to the needle at distances of 5 mm and 10 mm to monitor the local tissue temperature during the procedure. b Photograph shows laser ablation (arrowhead) in porcine heart. Two thermocouple probes (asterisk) were placed at the same depth parallel to the needle at distances of 5 mm and 10 mm to monitor the local tissue temperature during the procedure. c The coagulation necrosis zones of radiofrequency ablation. The long-axis diameter (a) and short-axis diameter (b) are shown. d The coagulation necrosis zones of laser ablation. The center of laser ablation was carbonized more obviously than that of radiofrequency ablation
The long-axis diameter, short-axis diameter and volume change of coagulations at different thermal energy by laser ablation and radiofrequency ablation
| Energy (J) | LA | RFA | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-axis diameter (cm) | Short-axis diameter (cm) | Volume (cm3) | Long-axis diameter (cm) | Short-axis diameter (cm) | Volume (cm3) | |
| 1200 | 2.1 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.0 | 0.3 ± 0.0 |
| 2400 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 2.4 ± 0.5 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.1 |
| 3600 | 2.4 ± 0.1 | 1.9 ± 0.1 | 4.2 ± 0.1 | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.1 |
| 4800 | 2.5 ± 0.1 | 2.1 ± 0.1 | 5.3 ± 0.2 | 2.3 ± 0.0 | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 2.2 ± 0.2 |
Fig. 2The changes in the a long-axis diameter, b short-axis diameter and c volume after myocardial ablation with different laser ablative energies. *The results between the different energies are significantly different (P < 0.05)
Fig. 3The changes in the a long-axis diameter, b short-axis diameter and c volume after myocardial ablation with different radiofrequency ablative energies. *The results between the different energies are significantly different (P < 0.05)
Fig. 4Graphs show the a long-axis diameter, b short-axis diameter and c volume of the coagulation zone with laser ablation and radiofrequency ablation at the same energy. Error bars = 95% confidence interval. *The results between the two ablation systems are significantly different (P < 0.05)
Fig. 5Graphs show the temperature curves of the thermal distribution at different energies with laser ablation (black curves) and radiofrequency ablation (red curves)