PURPOSE: To compare volume, sphericity, and short-axis diameter of the coagulation zone of four commercially available microwave ablation systems with three technical concepts in an ex vivo setting and to formulate mathematical models to predict these quantities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two high-power systems (systems A and B), a system that enables simultaneous use of three antennas (system C), and a non-perfusion-cooled system that automatically adapts power and frequency (system D) were tested in ex vivo bovine livers (108 ablations). Coagulation volume, sphericity, and mean short-axis diameter were assessed, and mathematical functions were fitted for each system and assessed with the coefficient of determination (R(2)). Analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc tests were used for interdevice comparison after 5 and 10 minutes and after maximum recommended ablation time. RESULTS: Volume and short-axis diameter were determined by using a mathematical model for every system, with coefficients of determination of 0.75-0.98 and 0.70-0.97, respectively. Correlation for determination of sphericity was lower (R(2) = 0.01-0.68). Mean results with ablation performed according to manufacturer recommendations were as follows: Volume, sphericity, and short-axis diameter were 57.5 cm(3), 0.75, and 43.4 mm, respectively, for system A; 72.3 cm(3), 0.68, and 45.5 mm, respectively, for system B; 17.1 cm(3), 0.58, and 26.8 mm, respectively, for system C (one antenna); 76.5 cm(3), 0.89, and 50.6 mm, respectively, for system C (three antennas); and 56.0 cm(3), 0.64, and 40.9 mm, respectively, for system D. Systems A (mean volume, 52.4 cm(3) ± 4.5 [standard deviation]) and B (39.4 cm(3) ± 1.7) reach large ablation zones with 5-minute ablation. CONCLUSION: The largest ablation zone is obtained with systems B and C (three antennas) under maximum recommended ablation duration and with system A under short ablation time. The most spherical zone is obtained with system C (three antennas).
PURPOSE: To compare volume, sphericity, and short-axis diameter of the coagulation zone of four commercially available microwave ablation systems with three technical concepts in an ex vivo setting and to formulate mathematical models to predict these quantities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two high-power systems (systems A and B), a system that enables simultaneous use of three antennas (system C), and a non-perfusion-cooled system that automatically adapts power and frequency (system D) were tested in ex vivo bovine livers (108 ablations). Coagulation volume, sphericity, and mean short-axis diameter were assessed, and mathematical functions were fitted for each system and assessed with the coefficient of determination (R(2)). Analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc tests were used for interdevice comparison after 5 and 10 minutes and after maximum recommended ablation time. RESULTS: Volume and short-axis diameter were determined by using a mathematical model for every system, with coefficients of determination of 0.75-0.98 and 0.70-0.97, respectively. Correlation for determination of sphericity was lower (R(2) = 0.01-0.68). Mean results with ablation performed according to manufacturer recommendations were as follows: Volume, sphericity, and short-axis diameter were 57.5 cm(3), 0.75, and 43.4 mm, respectively, for system A; 72.3 cm(3), 0.68, and 45.5 mm, respectively, for system B; 17.1 cm(3), 0.58, and 26.8 mm, respectively, for system C (one antenna); 76.5 cm(3), 0.89, and 50.6 mm, respectively, for system C (three antennas); and 56.0 cm(3), 0.64, and 40.9 mm, respectively, for system D. Systems A (mean volume, 52.4 cm(3) ± 4.5 [standard deviation]) and B (39.4 cm(3) ± 1.7) reach large ablation zones with 5-minute ablation. CONCLUSION: The largest ablation zone is obtained with systems B and C (three antennas) under maximum recommended ablation duration and with system A under short ablation time. The most spherical zone is obtained with system C (three antennas).
Authors: Thomas J Vogl; Andrei Roman; Nour-Eldin A Nour-Eldin; Wolfgang Hohenforst-Schmidt; Iliana Bednarova; Benjamin Kaltenbach Journal: Diagn Interv Radiol Date: 2018 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.630
Authors: Rüdiger Hoffmann; Hansjörg Rempp; Frank Eibofner; David-Emanuel Keßler; Gunnar Blumenstock; Jakob Weiß; Philippe L Pereira; Konstantin Nikolaou; Stephan Clasen Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-07-02 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Erik Velez; S Nahum Goldberg; Gaurav Kumar; Yuanguo Wang; Svetlana Gourevitch; Jacob Sosna; Tyler Moon; Christopher L Brace; Muneeb Ahmed Journal: Radiology Date: 2016-07-13 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: H Petra Kok; Erik N K Cressman; Wim Ceelen; Christopher L Brace; Robert Ivkov; Holger Grüll; Gail Ter Haar; Peter Wust; Johannes Crezee Journal: Int J Hyperthermia Date: 2020 Impact factor: 3.914
Authors: Muneeb Ahmed; Luigi Solbiati; Christopher L Brace; David J Breen; Matthew R Callstrom; J William Charboneau; Min-Hua Chen; Byung Ihn Choi; Thierry de Baère; Gerald D Dodd; Damian E Dupuy; Debra A Gervais; David Gianfelice; Alice R Gillams; Fred T Lee; Edward Leen; Riccardo Lencioni; Peter J Littrup; Tito Livraghi; David S Lu; John P McGahan; Maria Franca Meloni; Boris Nikolic; Philippe L Pereira; Ping Liang; Hyunchul Rhim; Steven C Rose; Riad Salem; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Stephen B Solomon; Michael C Soulen; Masatoshi Tanaka; Thomas J Vogl; Bradford J Wood; S Nahum Goldberg Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2014-10-23 Impact factor: 3.464