Eun Ju Ha1, Jung Hwan Baek, Kyung Won Kim, Junhee Pyo, Jeong Hyun Lee, Seung Hee Baek, Helle Døssing, Laszlo Hegedüs. 1. Department of Radiology (E.J.H.), Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 443-380, Korea; Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology (J.H.B., K.W.K., J.H.L.), University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul 138-736, Korea; WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Policy and Regulation, Department of Pharmaceutical Science (J.P.), Utrecht University, Netherlands; Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.H.B.), University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul 138-736, Korea; and Departments of Otorhinolaryngology (H.D.) and Endocrinology (L.H.), Odense University Hospital, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and laser ablation (LA) for treatment of benign solid thyroid nodules, using a systematic review including traditional pooling and Bayesian network meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature search in PubMed-MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases identified prospective studies evaluating the percentage mean change [absolute mean change (mL)] in nodule volume after RFA or LA. Studies from January 1, 2000, to November 1, 2013, were included. Review of 128 potential papers, including a full-text review of 33, identified 10 eligible papers covering a total of 184 patients for meta-analysis. The percentage mean change [absolute mean change] in nodule volume over a 6-month follow-up was compared between RFA and LA. RESULTS: Based on the traditional frequentist approach, the pooled percentage mean changes (95% confidence interval) of RFA and LA were 76.1% (70.1-82.1) and 49.9% (41.4-58.5), respectively, and the pooled absolute mean changes (95% confidence interval) of RFA and LA were 8.9 mL (6.6-11.2) and 5.2 mL (4.3-6.1), respectively. Based on the Bayesian network meta-analysis, RFA achieved a larger pooled percentage mean change (95% credible interval) and absolute mean change (95% credible interval) compared to LA [77.8% (67.7-88.0) vs 49.5% (26.7-72.4), and 9.2 mL (5.8-11.9) vs 5.3 mL (2.1-8.5), respectively]. The RFA group has the highest probability of having the most efficacious treatment (98.7%). There were no major complications after either RFA or LA. CONCLUSIONS: RFA appears to be superior to LA in reducing benign solid thyroid nodule volume, despite the smaller number of treatment sessions without major side effects.
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and laser ablation (LA) for treatment of benign solid thyroid nodules, using a systematic review including traditional pooling and Bayesian network meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature search in PubMed-MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases identified prospective studies evaluating the percentage mean change [absolute mean change (mL)] in nodule volume after RFA or LA. Studies from January 1, 2000, to November 1, 2013, were included. Review of 128 potential papers, including a full-text review of 33, identified 10 eligible papers covering a total of 184 patients for meta-analysis. The percentage mean change [absolute mean change] in nodule volume over a 6-month follow-up was compared between RFA and LA. RESULTS: Based on the traditional frequentist approach, the pooled percentage mean changes (95% confidence interval) of RFA and LA were 76.1% (70.1-82.1) and 49.9% (41.4-58.5), respectively, and the pooled absolute mean changes (95% confidence interval) of RFA and LA were 8.9 mL (6.6-11.2) and 5.2 mL (4.3-6.1), respectively. Based on the Bayesian network meta-analysis, RFA achieved a larger pooled percentage mean change (95% credible interval) and absolute mean change (95% credible interval) compared to LA [77.8% (67.7-88.0) vs 49.5% (26.7-72.4), and 9.2 mL (5.8-11.9) vs 5.3 mL (2.1-8.5), respectively]. The RFA group has the highest probability of having the most efficacious treatment (98.7%). There were no major complications after either RFA or LA. CONCLUSIONS: RFA appears to be superior to LA in reducing benign solid thyroid nodule volume, despite the smaller number of treatment sessions without major side effects.
Authors: Harald Dobnig; Wolfgang Zechmann; Michael Hermann; Michael Lehner; Dirk Heute; Siroos Mirzaei; Alois Gessl; Vinzenz Stepan; Günter Höfle; Philipp Riss; Andrea Simon Journal: Wien Med Wochenschr Date: 2019-02-06
Authors: Antonio Barile; Simone Quarchioni; Federico Bruno; Anna Maria Ierardi; Francesco Arrigoni; Aldo Victor Giordano; Sergio Carducci; Marco Varrassi; Giampaolo Carrafiello; Ferdinando Caranci; Alessandra Splendiani; Ernesto Di Cesare; Carlo Masciocchi Journal: Gland Surg Date: 2018-04
Authors: Gee Mun Lee; Ji Young You; Hoon Yub Kim; Young Jun Chai; Hong Kyu Kim; Gianlorenzo Dionigi; Ralph P Tufano Journal: Endocrine Date: 2018-12-19 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Yücel Korkusuz; Alexander Mader; Daniel Gröner; Shadi Ahmad; Oscar Maximilian Mader; Frank Grünwald; Christian Happel Journal: World J Surg Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 3.352