Literature DB >> 33078996

Artificial Intelligence Applied to Breast MRI for Improved Diagnosis.

Yulei Jiang1, Alexandra V Edwards1, Gillian M Newstead1.   

Abstract

Background Recognition of salient MRI morphologic and kinetic features of various malignant tumor subtypes and benign diseases, either visually or with artificial intelligence (AI), allows radiologists to improve diagnoses that may improve patient treatment. Purpose To evaluate whether the diagnostic performance of radiologists in the differentiation of cancer from noncancer at dynamic contrast material-enhanced (DCE) breast MRI is improved when using an AI system compared with conventionally available software. Materials and Methods In a retrospective clinical reader study, images from breast DCE MRI examinations were interpreted by 19 breast imaging radiologists from eight academic and 11 private practices. Readers interpreted each examination twice. In the "first read," they were provided with conventionally available computer-aided evaluation software, including kinetic maps. In the "second read," they were also provided with AI analytics through computer-aided diagnosis software. Reader diagnostic performance was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, with the area under the ROC curve (AUC) as a figure of merit in the task of distinguishing between malignant and benign lesions. The primary study end point was the difference in AUC between the first-read and the second-read conditions. Results One hundred eleven women (mean age, 52 years ± 13 [standard deviation]) were evaluated with a total of 111 breast DCE MRI examinations (54 malignant and 57 nonmalignant lesions). The average AUC of all readers improved from 0.71 to 0.76 (P = .04) when using the AI system. The average sensitivity improved when Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 3 was used as the cut point (from 90% to 94%; 95% confidence interval [CI] for the change: 0.8%, 7.4%) but not when using BI-RADS category 4a (from 80% to 85%; 95% CI: -0.9%, 11%). The average specificity showed no difference when using either BI-RADS category 4a or category 3 as the cut point (52% and 52% [95% CI: -7.3%, 6.0%], and from 29% to 28% [95% CI: -6.4%, 4.3%], respectively). Conclusion Use of an artificial intelligence system improves radiologists' performance in the task of differentiating benign and malignant MRI breast lesions. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Krupinski in this issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33078996     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020200292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  15 in total

Review 1.  Radiomics in breast MRI: current progress toward clinical application in the era of artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Hiroko Satake; Satoko Ishigaki; Rintaro Ito; Shinji Naganawa
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Impact of continuous learning on diagnostic breast MRI AI: evaluation on an independent clinical dataset.

Authors:  Hui Li; Heather M Whitney; Yu Ji; Alexandra Edwards; John Papaioannou; Peifang Liu; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2022-06-06

Review 3.  Clinical Artificial Intelligence Applications: Breast Imaging.

Authors:  Qiyuan Hu; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 1.947

Review 4.  Updates in Artificial Intelligence for Breast Imaging.

Authors:  Manisha Bahl
Journal:  Semin Roentgenol       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 0.709

5.  A Machine Learning Decision Support System (DSS) for Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients Treated with Somatostatin Analog (SSA) Therapy.

Authors:  Jasminka Hasic Telalovic; Serena Pillozzi; Rachele Fabbri; Alice Laffi; Daniele Lavacchi; Virginia Rossi; Lorenzo Dreoni; Francesca Spada; Nicola Fazio; Amedeo Amedei; Ernesto Iadanza; Lorenzo Antonuzzo
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-28

Review 6.  Application of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Oncology: Towards the Establishment of Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Ryuji Hamamoto; Kruthi Suvarna; Masayoshi Yamada; Kazuma Kobayashi; Norio Shinkai; Mototaka Miyake; Masamichi Takahashi; Shunichi Jinnai; Ryo Shimoyama; Akira Sakai; Ken Takasawa; Amina Bolatkan; Kanto Shozu; Ai Dozen; Hidenori Machino; Satoshi Takahashi; Ken Asada; Masaaki Komatsu; Jun Sese; Syuzo Kaneko
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 7.  Challenges in translational machine learning.

Authors:  Artuur Couckuyt; Ruth Seurinck; Annelies Emmaneel; Katrien Quintelier; David Novak; Sofie Van Gassen; Yvan Saeys
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 5.881

8.  Artificial intelligence stenosis diagnosis in coronary CTA: effect on the performance and consistency of readers with less cardiovascular experience.

Authors:  Xianjun Han; Nan Luo; Lixue Xu; Jiaxin Cao; Ning Guo; Yi He; Min Hong; Xibin Jia; Zhenchang Wang; Zhenghan Yang
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 1.930

9.  An MRI-Based Radiomics Model for Predicting the Benignity and Malignancy of BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions.

Authors:  Renzhi Zhang; Wei Wei; Rang Li; Jing Li; Zhuhuang Zhou; Menghang Ma; Rui Zhao; Xinming Zhao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 10.  Deep Learning for Smart Healthcare-A Survey on Brain Tumor Detection from Medical Imaging.

Authors:  Mahsa Arabahmadi; Reza Farahbakhsh; Javad Rezazadeh
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.