Literature DB >> 33925256

A Machine Learning Decision Support System (DSS) for Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients Treated with Somatostatin Analog (SSA) Therapy.

Jasminka Hasic Telalovic1, Serena Pillozzi2, Rachele Fabbri3, Alice Laffi4, Daniele Lavacchi2, Virginia Rossi2, Lorenzo Dreoni2, Francesca Spada4, Nicola Fazio4, Amedeo Amedei5, Ernesto Iadanza3, Lorenzo Antonuzzo2.   

Abstract

The application of machine learning (ML) techniques could facilitate the identification of predictive biomarkers of somatostatin analog (SSA) efficacy in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). We collected data from 74 patients with a pancreatic or gastrointestinal NET who received SSA as first-line therapy. We developed three classification models to predict whether the patient would experience a progressive disease (PD) after 12 or 18 months based on clinic-pathological factors at the baseline. The dataset included 70 samples and 15 features. We initially developed three classification models with accuracy ranging from 55% to 70%. We then compared ten different ML algorithms. In all but one case, the performance of the Multinomial Naïve Bayes algorithm (80%) was the highest. The support vector machine classifier (SVC) had a higher performance for the recall metric of the progression-free outcome (97% vs. 94%). Overall, for the first time, we documented that the factors that mainly influenced progression-free survival (PFS) included age, the number of metastatic sites and the primary site. In addition, the following factors were also isolated as important: adverse events G3-G4, sex, Ki67, metastatic site (liver), functioning NET, the primary site and the stage. In patients with advanced NETs, ML provides a predictive model that could potentially be used to differentiate prognostic groups and to identify patients for whom SSA therapy as a single agent may not be sufficient to achieve a long-lasting PFS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  machine learning; neuroendocrine tumors; predictive biomarkers; prognostic factors; random forest classifier; somatostatin analogs

Year:  2021        PMID: 33925256     DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11050804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)        ISSN: 2075-4418


  43 in total

1.  Studies on carcinoid disease.

Authors:  A H THORSON
Journal:  Acta Med Scand Suppl       Date:  1958

Review 2.  A review of feature selection methods in medical applications.

Authors:  Beatriz Remeseiro; Veronica Bolon-Canedo
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.589

Review 3.  Systemic therapy for advanced carcinoid tumors: where do we go from here?

Authors:  A Scott Paulson; Emily K Bergsland
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 11.908

4.  A proposed staging system for gastric carcinoid tumors based on an analysis of 1,543 patients.

Authors:  Christine S Landry; Guy Brock; Charles R Scoggins; Kelly M McMasters; Robert C G Martin
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 5.  One hundred years after "carcinoid": epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States.

Authors:  James C Yao; Manal Hassan; Alexandria Phan; Cecile Dagohoy; Colleen Leary; Jeannette E Mares; Eddie K Abdalla; Jason B Fleming; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Asif Rashid; Douglas B Evans
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Prospective, Randomized Study on the Effect of Octreotide LAR in the Control of Tumor Growth in Patients with Metastatic Neuroendocrine Midgut Tumors (PROMID): Results of Long-Term Survival.

Authors:  Anja Rinke; Michael Wittenberg; Carmen Schade-Brittinger; Behnaz Aminossadati; Erdmuthe Ronicke; Thomas M Gress; Hans-Helge Müller; Rudolf Arnold
Journal:  Neuroendocrinology       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 4.914

7.  Prognostic significance of MTOR pathway component expression in neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Zhi Rong Qian; Monica Ter-Minassian; Jennifer A Chan; Yu Imamura; Susanne M Hooshmand; Aya Kuchiba; Teppei Morikawa; Lauren K Brais; Anastassia Daskalova; Rachel Heafield; Xihong Lin; David C Christiani; Charles S Fuchs; Shuji Ogino; Matthew H Kulke
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Artificial Intelligence Improves the Accuracy in Histologic Classification of Breast Lesions.

Authors:  António Polónia; Sofia Campelos; Ana Ribeiro; Ierece Aymore; Daniel Pinto; Magdalena Biskup-Fruzynska; Ricardo Santana Veiga; Rita Canas-Marques; Guilherme Aresta; Teresa Araújo; Aurélio Campilho; Scotty Kwok; Paulo Aguiar; Catarina Eloy
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 2.493

9.  Anti-tumour effects of lanreotide for pancreatic and intestinal neuroendocrine tumours: the CLARINET open-label extension study.

Authors:  Martyn E Caplin; Marianne Pavel; Jarosław B Ćwikła; Alexandria T Phan; Markus Raderer; Eva Sedláčková; Guillaume Cadiot; Edward M Wolin; Jaume Capdevila; Lucy Wall; Guido Rindi; Alison Langley; Séverine Martinez; Edda Gomez-Panzani; Philippe Ruszniewski
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.678

10.  Detecting Vasodilation as Potential Diagnostic Biomarker in Breast Cancer Using Deep Learning-Driven Thermomics.

Authors:  Bardia Yousefi; Hamed Akbari; Xavier P V Maldague
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-31
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms-A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Athanasios G Pantelis; Panagiota A Panagopoulou; Dimitris P Lapatsanis
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-31
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.