| Literature DB >> 33078386 |
Joseph Sullivan1, Ingrid E Scheffer2, Lieven Lagae3, Rima Nabbout4, Milka Pringsheim5,6, Dinesh Talwar7, Tilman Polster8, Bradley Galer9, Michael Lock9, Anupam Agarwal9, Arnold Gammaitoni9, Glenn Morrison9, Gail Farfel9.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Fenfluramine has been shown to provide clinically meaningful and statistically significant reductions in convulsive seizure frequency in children and adolescents (aged 2-18 years) with Dravet syndrome in two randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials. The objective of this analysis was to assess longer-term safety and efficacy of fenfluramine in patients who completed one of the double-blind studies and entered an open-label extension (OLE) study.Entities:
Keywords: Dravet syndrome; epilepsy; fenfluramine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33078386 PMCID: PMC7756901 DOI: 10.1111/epi.16722
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Epilepsia ISSN: 0013-9580 Impact factor: 5.864
Patient demographics and baseline characteristics
| N | 232 |
| Age, y | |
| Mean ± SD | 9.1 ± 4.7 |
| Median (min, max) | 9.0 (2, 19) |
| Age group, n (%) | |
| <6 y | 65 (25.0) |
| 6‐18 y | 166 (71.6) |
| >18 y | 1 (0.4) |
| Sex, n (%) | |
| Male | 128 (55.2) |
| Female | 104 (44.8) |
| Race, n (%) | |
| White | 172 (74.1) |
| Black or African American | 1 (0.4) |
| Asian | 9 (3.9) |
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 2 (0.9) |
| Other | 13 (5.6) |
| Not reported | 35 (15.1) |
| Ethnicity, n (%) | |
| Hispanic or Latino | 23 (9.9) |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 159 (68.5) |
| Not reported | 47 (20.3) |
| Unknown | 3 (1.3) |
| Region, n (%) | |
| North America | 111 (47.8) |
| Europe and Australia | 121 (52.2) |
| BMI, kg/m2 | |
| Mean ± SD | 17.9 ± 4.2 |
| Median (min, max) | 17.0 (11.8, 39.7) |
| Concomitant antiepilepsy drugs, n (%) | |
| Valproate (all forms) | 173 (74.6) |
| Clobazam | 159 (68.5) |
| Stiripentol | 63 (27.2) |
| Topiramate | 63 (27.2) |
| Levetiracetam | 58 (25.0) |
| Clonazepam | 33 (14.2) |
| Bromides (all forms) | 24 (10.3) |
| Zonisamide | 21 (9.1) |
| Treatment in core phase 3 trial, n (%) | |
| Placebo | 64 (27.6) |
| Fenfluramine 0.7 mg/kg/d | 35 (15.1) |
| Fenfluramine 0.4 mg/kg/d | 21 (9.1) |
| Fenfluramine 0.2 mg/kg/d | 54 (23.3) |
| Not reported | 58 (25.0) |
| Baseline convulsive seizure frequency (seizures/28 d) | |
| N | 216 |
| Mean ± SD | 44.0 ± 113 |
| Median | 19.7 |
| Minimum, maximum | 0, |
Privacy laws in some regions/countries precluded disclosure of certain personal information.
These patients enrolled from a phase 3 trial that is not yet unblended.
Sixteen patients who enrolled in the pharmacokinetic cohort of Study 2 did not have baseline seizure frequency determined during the study and were not included in the efficacy analysis of the OLE study.
All patients had >0 seizures during baseline. The minimum value of 0 is due to an error in the seizure diary of a patient in a study that is still blinded.
Figure 1Median change from baseline in convulsive seizure frequency during treatment with fenfluramine in the open‐label extension study in the entire study population (Panel A) and in patients <6 and ≥6 years old (Panel B). OLE, open‐label extension. The number of patients assessed at each time point is shown below the x‐axes. Each point represents the cumulative change from baseline up to that time point. The decrease in patient number is due primarily to staggered entry into the OLE study—not to patient withdrawal. *P < .001, †P = .002 compared with no change (Wilcoxon signed‐rank test)
Figure 2Convulsive seizure responder rates over time in the open‐label extension study (OLE). The total number of patients assessed at each time point is shown below the x‐axis. The decrease in patient number is due primarily to staggered entry into the OLE study—not to patient withdrawal. The 24‐mo time point has been omitted for clarity. All three patients with a 24‐mo assessment demonstrated 100% reduction in convulsive seizure frequency
Figure 3Antiseizure responder analysis for patients treated in the open‐label extension study
Figure 4Percentage of patients rated “much improved” or “very much improved” by investigators or parents/caregivers in the OLE study. OLE, open‐label extension. The decrease in patient number is due primarily to staggered entry into the OLE study—not to patient withdrawal
Treatment‐emergent adverse events occurring in ≥10% of patients
| TEAE | n (%) |
|---|---|
| Pyrexia | 50 (21.6) |
| Nasopharyngitis | 45 (19.4) |
| Decreased appetite | 37 (15.9) |
| Influenza | 27 (11.6) |
| Seizure | 26 (11.2) |
| Diarrhea | 25 (10.8) |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | 24 (10.3) |