Literature DB >> 26941185

Worldwide withdrawal of medicinal products because of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review and analysis.

Igho J Onakpoya1, Carl J Heneghan1, Jeffrey K Aronson1.   

Abstract

We have systematically identified medicinal products withdrawn worldwide because of adverse drug reactions, assessed the level of evidence used for making the withdrawal decisions, and explored the patterns of withdrawals over time. We searched PubMed, the WHO database of withdrawn products, and selected texts. We included products that were withdrawn after launch from 1950 onwards, excluding non-human and over-the-counter medicines. We assessed the levels of evidence on which withdrawals were based using the Oxford Center for Evidence Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. Of 353 medicinal products withdrawn from any country, only 40 were withdrawn worldwide. Anecdotal reports were cited as evidence for withdrawal in 30 (75%) and deaths occurred in 27 (68%). Hepatic, cardiac, and nervous system toxicity accounted for over 60% of withdrawals. In 28 cases, the first withdrawal was initiated by the manufacturer. The median interval between the first report of an adverse drug reaction that led to withdrawal and the first withdrawal was 1 year (range 0-43 years). Worldwide withdrawals occurred within 1 year after the first withdrawal in any country. In conclusion, the time it takes for drugs to be withdrawn worldwide after reports of adverse drug reactions has shortened over time. However, there are inconsistencies in current withdrawal procedures when adverse drug reactions are suspected. A uniform method for establishing worldwide withdrawal of approved medicinal products when adverse drug reactions are suspected should be developed, to facilitate global withdrawals. Rapid synthesis of the evidence on harms should be a priority when serious adverse reactions are suspected.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse reaction; interval; side effect; systematic review; worldwide recall

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26941185     DOI: 10.3109/10408444.2016.1149452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol        ISSN: 1040-8444            Impact factor:   5.635


  29 in total

1.  Optimisation of the HepaRG cell line model for drug toxicity studies using two different cultivation conditions: advantages and limitations.

Authors:  Marc Ruoß; Andreas K Nüssler; Mohammad Majd Hammour; Amnah Othman; Romina Aspera-Werz; Bianca Braun; Michaela Weis-Klemm; Silvia Wagner; Silvio Nadalin; Tina Histing
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 6.168

2.  Cannabinoid receptor 1 antagonist genistein attenuates marijuana-induced vascular inflammation.

Authors:  Tzu-Tang Wei; Mark Chandy; Masataka Nishiga; Angela Zhang; Kaavya Krishna Kumar; Dilip Thomas; Amit Manhas; Siyeon Rhee; Johanne Marie Justesen; Ian Y Chen; Hung-Ta Wo; Saereh Khanamiri; Johnson Y Yang; Frederick J Seidl; Noah Z Burns; Chun Liu; Nazish Sayed; Jiun-Jie Shie; Chih-Fan Yeh; Kai-Chien Yang; Edward Lau; Kara L Lynch; Manuel Rivas; Brian K Kobilka; Joseph C Wu
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 66.850

3.  Role of Organic Solute Transporter Alpha/Beta in Hepatotoxic Bile Acid Transport and Drug Interactions.

Authors:  James J Beaudoin; Jacqueline Bezençon; Noora Sjöstedt; John K Fallon; Kim L R Brouwer
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 4.  Novel insights into the organic solute transporter alpha/beta, OSTα/β: From the bench to the bedside.

Authors:  James J Beaudoin; Kim L R Brouwer; Melina M Malinen
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 12.310

Review 5.  Cardiovascular disease models: A game changing paradigm in drug discovery and screening.

Authors:  Houman Savoji; Mohammad Hossein Mohammadi; Naimeh Rafatian; Masood Khaksar Toroghi; Erika Yan Wang; Yimu Zhao; Anastasia Korolj; Samad Ahadian; Milica Radisic
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 6.  Artificial Intelligence for Drug Toxicity and Safety.

Authors:  Anna O Basile; Alexandre Yahi; Nicholas P Tatonetti
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 14.819

7.  Topological alternate centrality measure capturing drug targets in the network of MAPK pathways.

Authors:  V K Md Aksam; V M Chandrasekaran; Sundaramurthy Pandurangan
Journal:  IET Syst Biol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.615

Review 8.  Human iPSC modeling of heart disease for drug development.

Authors:  Anna P Hnatiuk; Francesca Briganti; David W Staudt; Mark Mercola
Journal:  Cell Chem Biol       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 8.116

9.  EA3: A softmax algorithm for evidence appraisal aggregation.

Authors:  Francesco De Pretis; Jürgen Landes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Bioengineering considerations in liver regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Ogechi Ogoke; Janet Oluwole; Natesh Parashurama
Journal:  J Biol Eng       Date:  2017-11-26       Impact factor: 4.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.