Literature DB >> 33075474

Ultra-high-dose-rate FLASH and Conventional-Dose-Rate Irradiation Differentially Affect Human Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Normal Hematopoiesis.

Sara Chabi1, Thi Hong Van To2, Ron Leavitt3, Sandrine Poglio1, Patrik Gonçalves Jorge4, Maud Jaccard5, Kristoffer Petersson4, Benoit Petit3, Paul-Henri Roméo6, Françoise Pflumio1, Marie-Catherine Vozenin7, Benjamin Uzan1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Ultra-high-dose-rate FLASH radiation therapy has been shown to minimize side effects of irradiation in various organs while keeping antitumor efficacy. This property, called the FLASH effect, has caused enthusiasm in the radiation oncology community because it opens opportunities for safe dose escalation and improved radiation therapy outcome. Here, we investigated the impact of ultra-high-dose-rate FLASH versus conventional-dose-rate (CONV) total body irradiation (TBI) on humanized models of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) and normal human hematopoiesis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We optimized the geometry of irradiation to ensure reproducible and homogeneous procedures using eRT6/Oriatron. Three T-ALL patient-derived xenografts and hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) and CD34+ cells isolated from umbilical cord blood were transplanted into immunocompromised mice, together or separately. After reconstitution, mice received 4 Gy FLASH and CONV-TBI, and tumor growth and normal hematopoiesis were studied. A retrospective study of clinical and gene-profiling data previously obtained on the 3 T-ALL patient-derived xenografts was performed.
RESULTS: FLASH-TBI was more efficient than CONV-TBI in controlling the propagation of 2 cases of T-ALL, whereas the third case of T-ALL was more responsive to CONV-TBI. The 2 FLASH-sensitive cases of T-ALL had similar genetic abnormalities, and a putative susceptibility imprint to FLASH-RT was found. In addition, FLASH-TBI was able to preserve some HSPC/CD34+ cell potential. Interestingly, when HSPC and T-ALL were present in the same animals, FLASH-TBI could control tumor development in most (3 of 4) of the secondary grafted animals, whereas among the mice receiving CONV-TBI, treated cells died with high leukemia infiltration.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with CONV-TBI, FLASH-TBI reduced functional damage to human blood stem cells and had a therapeutic effect on human T-ALL with a common genetic and genomic profile. The validity of the defined susceptibility imprint needs to be investigated further; however, to our knowledge, the present findings are the first to show benefits of FLASH-TBI on human hematopoiesis and leukemia treatment.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33075474     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   8.013


  9 in total

1.  Model studies of the role of oxygen in the FLASH effect.

Authors:  Vincent Favaudon; Rudi Labarbe; Charles L Limoli
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Ultra-high dose rate electron beams and the FLASH effect: From preclinical evidence to a new radiotherapy paradigm.

Authors:  Emil Schüler; Munjal Acharya; Pierre Montay-Gruel; Billy W Loo; Marie-Catherine Vozenin; Peter G Maxim
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.506

3.  Using oxygen dose histograms to quantify voxelised ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) effects in multiple radiation modalities.

Authors:  Frank Van den Heuvel; Anna Vella; Francesca Fiorini; Mark Brooke; Mark Hill; Anderson Ryan; Tim Maughan; Amato Giaccia
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 4.174

4.  Single-fraction 34 Gy Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Using Proton Transmission Beams: FLASH-dose Calculations and the Influence of Different Dose-rate Methods and Dose/Dose-rate Thresholds.

Authors:  Patricia van Marlen; Wilko F A R Verbakel; Ben J Slotman; Max Dahele
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-04-10

5.  Perspectives for microbeam irradiation at the SYRMEP beamline.

Authors:  Elisabeth Schültke; Stefan Fiedler; Ralf Hendrik Menk; Felix Jaekel; Diego Dreossi; Katia Casarin; Giuliana Tromba; Stefan Bartzsch; Stephan Kriesen; Guido Hildebrandt; Fulvia Arfelli
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 2.616

6.  Cancer Cells Can Exhibit a Sparing FLASH Effect at Low Doses Under Normoxic In Vitro-Conditions.

Authors:  Gabriel Adrian; Elise Konradsson; Sarah Beyer; Anders Wittrup; Karl T Butterworth; Stephen J McMahon; Mihaela Ghita; Kristoffer Petersson; Crister Ceberg
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Comparable Long-Term Tumor Control for Hypofractionated FLASH Versus Conventional Radiation Therapy in an Immunocompetent Rat Glioma Model.

Authors:  Elise Konradsson; Emma Liljedahl; Emma Gustafsson; Gabriel Adrian; Sarah Beyer; Suhayb Ehsaan Ilaahi; Kristoffer Petersson; Crister Ceberg; Henrietta Nittby Redebrandt
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-07-02

8.  Determination of the ion collection efficiency of the Razor Nano Chamber for ultra-high dose-rate electron beams.

Authors:  Marco Cavallone; Patrik Gonçalves Jorge; Raphaël Moeckli; Claude Bailat; Alessandro Flacco; Yolanda Prezado; Rachel Delorme
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 4.506

9.  Total body irradiation as part of conditioning regimens in childhood leukemia-long-term outcome, toxicity, and secondary malignancies.

Authors:  Arne Gruen; Sebastian Exner; Jörn-Sven Kühl; Arend von Stackelberg; Volker Budach; Carmen Stromberger; Dirk Boehmer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 3.621

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.