Literature DB >> 33071551

Mock jurors' awareness of age-related changes in memory and cognitive capacity.

Natalie Martschuk1, Siegfried L Sporer1.   

Abstract

While age-related changes in memory have been well documented, findings about jurors' perceptions of older witnesses are conflicting. We investigated the effect of victim age (25 vs. 75 years old) and crime severity (victim injured vs. not injured) on mock jurors' decisions in a robbery trial. Jury-eligible participants (120 women; 84 men) read a mock trial summary and delivered their verdicts online. Mock jurors believed the young victim more than the older victim when the crime was severe, while no age differences emerged for the less severe crime. Whereas previous research demonstrated that juror characteristics were generally associated with culpability, we demonstrated that with case-specific information, these general views became less important. In all, mock jurors were aware of age-related decline in memory provided by eyewitnesses only to a limited extent. Accordingly, in trials involving older witnesses, jurors will benefit from educative information about age-related memory changes.
© 2020 The Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law.

Entities:  

Keywords:  crime severity; extra-legal factors; juror attitudes; juror decision-making; old age; perceived identification accuracy; probability of guilt; witness credibility

Year:  2020        PMID: 33071551      PMCID: PMC7534293          DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1721377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law        ISSN: 1321-8719


  12 in total

1.  The prosecution of sexual assault cases: correlation with forensic evidence.

Authors:  Kelly Gray-Eurom; David C Seaberg; Robert L Wears
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.721

2.  Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span.

Authors:  Denise C Park; Gary Lautenschlager; Trey Hedden; Natalie S Davidson; Anderson D Smith; Pamela K Smith
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2002-06

3.  Perceptions of older adult eyewitnesses: will you believe me when I'm 64?

Authors:  C A Brimacombe; Sandy Jung; Lynn Garrioch; Meredith Allison
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2003-10

4.  I misremember it well: why older adults are unreliable eyewitnesses.

Authors:  Chad S Dodson; Lacy E Krueger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

5.  Memory for faces in old age: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Natalie Martschuk; Siegfried L Sporer
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2018-09

6.  Policy and procedure recommendations for the collection and preservation of eyewitness identification evidence.

Authors:  Gary L Wells; Margaret Bull Kovera; Amy Bradfield Douglass; Neil Brewer; Christian A Meissner; John T Wixted
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2020-02

7.  A re-examination of the acquittal biasing effect of offence seriousness.

Authors:  Samantha Lundrigan; Mandeep K Dhami; Katrin Mueller-Johnson
Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law       Date:  2018-06-19

8.  Impact of Gruesome Photographic Evidence on Legal Decisions: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca Hofstein Grady; Lauren Reiser; Robert J Garcia; Christian Koeu; Nicholas Scurich
Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law       Date:  2018-03-15

9.  Is age irrelevant? Perceptions of young and old adult eyewitnesses.

Authors:  C A Brimacombe; N Quinton; N Nance; L Garrioch
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  1997-12

10.  Modelling the effects of crime type and evidence on judgments about guilt.

Authors:  John M Pearson; Jonathan R Law; Jesse A G Skene; Donald H Beskind; Neil Vidmar; David A Ball; Artemis Malekpour; R McKell Carter; J H Pate Skene
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2018-10-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.