| Literature DB >> 14593795 |
C A Brimacombe1, Sandy Jung, Lynn Garrioch, Meredith Allison.
Abstract
Participant-witnesses (young adults/young seniors/older seniors) viewed one of two versions of a simulated videotaped crime (crime context either familiar to young or older adults). The witnesses were videotaped responding to direct and cross-examination questions about the video. The older seniors were significantly less accurate than the young adults and young seniors. Familiarity of the crime context did not affect testimony accuracy. However, the older seniors were more verbose when describing a familiar context. Participant-jurors viewed the testimony videotapes and evaluated the witnesses' credibility. All witnesses were regarded as equally credible in testifying and less accurate in response to cross-examination questioning.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2003 PMID: 14593795 DOI: 10.1023/a:1025486006769
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Law Hum Behav ISSN: 0147-7307