Literature DB >> 33068070

Validation of the preconfigured Varian Ethos Acuros XB Beam Model for treatment planning dose calculations: A dosimetric study.

Yunfei Hu1, Mikel Byrne2, Ben Archibald-Heeren2, Nick Collett2, Guilin Liu2, Trent Aland3.   

Abstract

Varian (Palo Alto, California, United States) recently released an online adaptation treatment platform, Ethos, which has introduced a new Dose Preview and Automated Plan Generation module despite sharing identical beam data with the existing Halcyon linac. The module incorporates a preconfigured beam model and the Acuros XB algorithm (Ethos AXB model) to generate final dose calculations from an initial fluence optimization. In this study, we comprehensively validated the accuracy of the Ethos AXB model by comparing it against the Halcyon AXB model, the Halcyon Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) model, and measurements acquired on an Ethos linac. Results indicated that the Ethos AXB model demonstrated a comparable if not superior dosimetric accuracy to the Halcyon AXB model in basic and complex calculations, and at the same time its dosimetric accuracy in modulated and heterogeneous plans was better than that of the Halcyon AAA model. Despite the fact that the same algorithm was utilized, the Ethos AXB model and the Halcyon AXB model still exhibited variations across a range of tests, although these variations were predominantly insignificant in the clinical environment. The accuracy of the Ethos AXB model has been successfully verified in this study and is considered appropriate for the current clinical scope. On the basis of this study, clinical physicists can perform a data validation instead of a full data commissioning when implementing the Ethos system, thereby adopting a more efficient approach for Ethos installation.
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acuros XB; Ethos; adaptive; beam model; validation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33068070      PMCID: PMC7769396          DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys        ISSN: 1526-9914            Impact factor:   2.102


  26 in total

1.  Clinical validation of the Acuros XB photon dose calculation algorithm, a grid-based Boltzmann equation solver.

Authors:  Lone Hoffmann; Mai-Britt K Jørgensen; Ludvig P Muren; Jørgen B B Petersen
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 4.089

2.  Dosimetric validation of Acuros XB with Monte Carlo methods for photon dose calculations.

Authors:  K Bush; I M Gagne; S Zavgorodni; W Ansbacher; W Beckham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Impact of the calculation resolution of AAA for small fields and RapidArc treatment plans.

Authors:  Chin Loon Ong; Johan P Cuijpers; Suresh Senan; Ben J Slotman; Wilko F A R Verbakel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Evaluation of the dose calculation accuracy for small fields defined by jaw or MLC for AAA and Acuros XB algorithms.

Authors:  Antonella Fogliata; Francesca Lobefalo; Giacomo Reggiori; Antonella Stravato; Stefano Tomatis; Marta Scorsetti; Luca Cozzi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  On the dosimetric impact of inhomogeneity management in the Acuros XB algorithm for breast treatment.

Authors:  Antonella Fogliata; Giorgia Nicolini; Alessandro Clivio; Eugenio Vanetti; Luca Cozzi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Experimental verification of the Acuros XB and AAA dose calculation adjacent to heterogeneous media for IMRT and RapidArc of nasopharygeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Monica W K Kan; Lucullus H T Leung; Ronald W K So; Peter K N Yu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Clinical implementation and evaluation of the Acuros dose calculation algorithm.

Authors:  Chenyu Yan; Anthony G Combine; Greg Bednarz; Ronald J Lalonde; Bin Hu; Kathy Dickens; Raymond Wynn; Daniel C Pavord; M Saiful Huq
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-08-20       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Evaluation of the PTW microDiamond in edge-on orientation for dosimetry in small fields.

Authors:  Owen J Brace; Sultan F Alhujaili; Jason R Paino; Duncan J Butler; Dean Wilkinson; Brad M Oborn; Anatoly B Rosenfeld; Michael L F Lerch; Marco Petasecca; Jeremy A Davis
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Experience in commissioning the halcyon linac.

Authors:  Tucker Netherton; Yuting Li; Song Gao; Ann Klopp; Peter Balter; Laurence E Court; Ryan Scheuermann; Chris Kennedy; Lei Dong; James Metz; Dimitris Mihailidis; Clifton Ling; Mu Young Lee; Magdalena Constantin; Stephen Thompson; Juha Kauppinen; Pekka Uusitalo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Evaluation of Acuros XB algorithm based on RTOG 0813 dosimetric criteria for SBRT lung treatment with RapidArc.

Authors:  Suresh Rana; Kevin Rogers; Shyam Pokharel; ChihYao Cheng
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  3 in total

1.  Varian ethos online adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Early results of contouring accuracy, treatment plan quality, and treatment time.

Authors:  Mikel Byrne; Ben Archibald-Heeren; Yunfei Hu; Amy Teh; Rhea Beserminji; Emma Cai; Guilin Liu; Angela Yates; James Rijken; Nick Collett; Trent Aland
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  Commissioning a secondary dose calculation software for a 0.35 T MR-linac.

Authors:  Alex T Price; Nels C Knutson; Taeho Kim; Olga L Green
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Assessment of efficacy in automated plan generation for Varian Ethos intelligent optimization engine.

Authors:  Shyam Pokharel; Abilio Pacheco; Suzanne Tanner
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.102

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.