Literature DB >> 22060134

Clinical validation of the Acuros XB photon dose calculation algorithm, a grid-based Boltzmann equation solver.

Lone Hoffmann1, Mai-Britt K Jørgensen, Ludvig P Muren, Jørgen B B Petersen.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A new algorithm that uses a grid-based technique to solve the linear Boltzmann transport equation (LBTE) has been developed to improve the accuracy and speed of external photon beam treatment planning calculations. The aim of this study was to test the accuracy of this algorithm in both heterogeneous and homogeneous media.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Output factors, depth dose curves and profiles for symmetric fields were measured in water using diamond and ionization chamber detectors. Furthermore, asymmetric fields, fields collimated with the multi-leaf collimator, enhanced dynamic wedge fields as well as fields with different source-skin distances were measured. Various test plans were created on a CIRS thorax phantom including tissue-equivalent inserts and corresponding dose distributions within the phantom were measured with radiochromic films. The new grid-based LBTE solver, Acuros XB (Eclipse version 10.0, Varian Medical Systems, CA, USA) was used to calculate dose distributions for all field configurations and plans, for both 6 MV and 15 MV photons. Calculations were also performed with AAA, a standard convolution algorithm.
RESULTS: Compared to measurements, the output factors were within 1% for Acuros XB. For the depth doses, the average deviations were within 1% in dose and 1 mm in distance to agreement (DTA). For the profiles, the deviations were within 2%/1 mm except near the penumbra. Similar results were obtained for the other field configurations. Good agreement with AAA was also found. For the plans calculated on the CIRS phantom, the number of points meeting the gamma criterion of 3% in dose and 3 mm in DTA was higher with Acuros XB (98% for 6 MV; 100% for 15 MV) than with AAA (94% for 6 MV; 96% for 15 MV).
CONCLUSION: Dose calculations with the Acuros XB algorithm in homogeneous media are in good agreement with both measurements and the AAA algorithm. In heterogeneous media, the Acuros XB algorithm is superior to AAA in both lung and bony material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22060134     DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2011.629209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  11 in total

1.  Comparison of Acuros (AXB) and Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) for dose calculation in treatment of oesophageal cancer: effects on modelling tumour control probability.

Authors:  Sriram Padmanaban; Samantha Warren; Anthony Walsh; Mike Partridge; Maria A Hawkins
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.481

2.  Dose calculation of Acuros XB and Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy treatment with flattening filter free beams and the potential role of calculation grid size.

Authors:  Baotian Huang; Lili Wu; Peixian Lin; Chuangzhen Chen
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.481

3.  Comparative Analysis of Local Control Prediction Using Different Biophysical Models for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Bao-Tian Huang; Wu-Zhe Zhang; Li-Li Wu; Pei-Xian Lin; Jia-Yang Lu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Verification of Acuros XB dose algorithm using 3D printed low-density phantoms for clinical photon beams.

Authors:  Rodolfo Zavan; Philip McGeachy; Joseph Madamesila; Jose-Eduardo Villarreal-Barajas; Rao Khan
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 5.a.: Commissioning and QA of Treatment Planning Dose Calculations - Megavoltage Photon and Electron Beams.

Authors:  Jennifer B Smilowitz; Indra J Das; Vladimir Feygelman; Benedick A Fraass; Stephen F Kry; Ingrid R Marshall; Dimitris N Mihailidis; Zoubir Ouhib; Timothy Ritter; Michael G Snyder; Lynne Fairobent
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Comparative evaluation of modern dosimetry techniques near low- and high-density heterogeneities.

Authors:  Eyad A Alhakeem; Sami AlShaikh; Anatoly B Rosenfeld; Sergei F Zavgorodni
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Validation of the preconfigured Varian Ethos Acuros XB Beam Model for treatment planning dose calculations: A dosimetric study.

Authors:  Yunfei Hu; Mikel Byrne; Ben Archibald-Heeren; Nick Collett; Guilin Liu; Trent Aland
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Limits for the therapeutic application of the analytical anisotropic algorithm in the context of ablative lung radiotherapy near the minima of lung density and tumor size.

Authors:  Eric Lobb; Ahpa Plypoo
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 2.243

9.  A review on the use of grid-based Boltzmann equation solvers for dose calculation in external photon beam treatment planning.

Authors:  Monica W K Kan; Peter K N Yu; Lucullus H T Leung
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Dosimetric impact of intermediate dose calculation for optimization convergence error.

Authors:  Byung Do Park; Tae Gyu Kim; Jong Eon Kim
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-06-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.