Literature DB >> 33067750

Quantitative clinical nuclear cardiology, part 2: Evolving/emerging applications.

Piotr J Slomka1, Jonathan B Moody2, Robert J H Miller3,4, Jennifer M Renaud2, Edward P Ficaro2,5, Ernest V Garcia6.   

Abstract

Quantitative analysis has been applied extensively to image processing and interpretation in nuclear cardiology to improve disease diagnosis and risk stratification. This is Part 2 of a two-part continuing medical education article, which will review the potential clinical role for emerging quantitative analysis tools. The article will describe advanced methods for quantifying dyssynchrony, ventricular function and perfusion, and hybrid imaging analysis. This article discusses evolving methods to measure myocardial blood flow with positron emission tomography and single-photon emission computed tomography. Novel quantitative assessments of myocardial viability, microcalcification and in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis and cardiac amyloidosis will also be described. Lastly, we will review the potential role for artificial intelligence to improve image analysis, disease diagnosis, and risk prediction. The potential clinical role for all these novel techniques will be highlighted as well as methods to optimize their implementation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nuclear cardiology; artificial intelligence; myocardial blood flow; phase analysis; quantitation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33067750     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-020-02337-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  76 in total

1.  Diagnostic performance of the quantification of myocardium at risk from MPI SPECT/CTA 2G fusion for detecting obstructive coronary disease: A multicenter trial.

Authors:  Marina Piccinelli; Cesar Santana; Gopi Kiran R Sirineni; Russell D Folks; C David Cooke; Chesnal D Arepalli; Santiago Aguade-Bruix; Zohar Keidar; Alex Frenkel; Ora Israel; Jaume Candell-Riera; Ernest V Garcia
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Quantitative Clinical Nuclear Cardiology, Part 1: Established Applications.

Authors:  Ernest V Garcia; Piotr Slomka; Jonathan B Moody; Guido Germano; Edward P Ficaro
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Effect of reduced photon count levels and choice of normal data on semi-automated image assessment in cardiac SPECT: Doing more with fewer counts.

Authors:  Marina Piccinelli; James Galt
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  5-Year Prognostic Value of Quantitative Versus Visual MPI in Subtle Perfusion Defects: Results From REFINE SPECT.

Authors:  Yuka Otaki; Julian Betancur; Tali Sharir; Lien-Hsin Hu; Heidi Gransar; Joanna X Liang; Peyman N Azadani; Andrew J Einstein; Mathews B Fish; Terrence D Ruddy; Philipp A Kaufmann; Albert J Sinusas; Edward J Miller; Timothy M Bateman; Sharmila Dorbala; Marcelo Di Carli; Balaji K Tamarappoo; Guido Germano; Damini Dey; Daniel S Berman; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-06-12

5.  Automatic and visual reproducibility of perfusion and function measures for myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Yuan Xu; Sean Hayes; Iftikhar Ali; Terrence D Ruddy; R Glenn Wells; Daniel S Berman; Guido Germano; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Quantitative analysis of myocardial perfusion SPECT anatomically guided by coregistered 64-slice coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Piotr J Slomka; Victor Y Cheng; Damini Dey; Jonghye Woo; Amit Ramesh; Serge Van Kriekinge; Yasuzuki Suzuki; Yaron Elad; Ronald Karlsberg; Daniel S Berman; Guido Germano
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Automatic quantification of myocardial perfusion stress-rest change: a new measure of ischemia.

Authors:  Piotr J Slomka; Hidetaka Nishina; Daniel S Berman; Xingping Kang; John D Friedman; Sean W Hayes; Usaf E Aladl; Guido Germano
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Hybrid myocardial perfusion SPECT/CT coronary angiography and invasive coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris lead to similar treatment decisions.

Authors:  Jeroen Schaap; Joris A H de Groot; Koen Nieman; W Bob Meijboom; S Matthijs Boekholdt; Martijn C Post; Jan A S Van der Heyden; Thom L de Kroon; Benno J W M Rensing; Karel G M Moons; J Fred Verzijlbergen
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 9.  Quantitative Clinical Nuclear Cardiology, Part 1: Established Applications.

Authors:  Ernest V Garcia; Piotr Slomka; Jonathan B Moody; Guido Germano; Edward P Ficaro
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Impact of Early Revascularization on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Relation to Automatically Quantified Ischemia.

Authors:  Peyman N Azadani; Robert J H Miller; Tali Sharir; Marcio A Diniz; Lien-Hsin Hu; Yuka Otaki; Heidi Gransar; Joanna X Liang; Evann Eisenberg; Andrew J Einstein; Mathews B Fish; Terrence D Ruddy; Philipp A Kaufmann; Albert J Sinusas; Edward J Miller; Timothy M Bateman; Sharmila Dorbala; Marcelo Di Carli; Balaji K Tamarappoo; Damini Dey; Daniel S Berman; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-08-19
View more
  10 in total

1.  Myocardial blood flow quantitation with the SPECT technique: Where do we stand?

Authors:  Wei Fang; Bailing Hsu
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Is quantitative fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET image analysis the key to Identify cardiac sarcoidosis?

Authors:  Richard C Brunken
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Impact of residual subtraction on myocardial blood flow and reserve estimates from rapid dynamic PET protocols.

Authors:  Edward P Ficaro; Venkatesh L Murthy; Alexis Poitrasson-Rivière; Jonathan B Moody; Jennifer M Renaud; Tomoe Hagio; Liliana Arida-Moody; Christopher Buckley; Richard L Weinberg
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.872

4.  Artificial intelligence and imaging: Opportunities in cardio-oncology.

Authors:  Nidhi Madan; Julliette Lucas; Nausheen Akhter; Patrick Collier; Feixiong Cheng; Avirup Guha; Lili Zhang; Abhinav Sharma; Abdulaziz Hamid; Imeh Ndiokho; Ethan Wen; Noelle C Garster; Marielle Scherrer-Crosbie; Sherry-Ann Brown
Journal:  Am Heart J Plus       Date:  2022-04-06

5.  Assessing myocardial perfusion in suspected coronary artery disease: rationale and design of the second phase 3, open-label multi-center study of flurpiridaz (F-18) injection for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging.

Authors:  Jamieson M Bourque; Christopher A Hanson; Denis Agostini; Timothy M Bateman; Jeroen J Bax; Rob S B Beanlands; Daniel S Berman; Ernest V Garcia; Gary V Heller; Juhani Knuuti; Nagara Tamaki; James E Udelson; Jamshid Maddahi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2021-01-31       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Quantitative clinical nuclear cardiology, part 2: Evolving/emerging applications.

Authors:  Piotr J Slomka; Jonathan B Moody; Robert J H Miller; Jennifer M Renaud; Edward P Ficaro; Ernest V Garcia
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  A methodological framework for AI-assisted diagnosis of active aortitis using radiomic analysis of FDG PET-CT images: Initial analysis.

Authors:  Lisa Duff; Andrew F Scarsbrook; Sarah L Mackie; Russell Frood; Marc Bailey; Ann W Morgan; Charalampos Tsoumpas
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 8.  Cardiac imaging for the assessment of patients being evaluated for liver transplantation.

Authors:  Kameel Kassab; Rami Doukky
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 3.872

9.  Added value gated PET with phase analysis for the detection of scar burden and prognostication in cardiac sarcoidosis?

Authors:  Thomas H Schindler; Adeel Haq; Sudhir Jain
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.872

10.  SPECT-MPI in evaluation of liver transplant candidates: Is the evidence mounting?

Authors:  Javier Gomez
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-06-21       Impact factor: 5.952

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.