| Literature DB >> 33063132 |
J Ristau1,2,3,4, F L Giesel4,5,6, M F Haefner1,2,3,4, F Staudinger5, T Lindner5, A Merkel5, J Schlittenhardt5, C Kratochwil5,6, P L Choyke7, K Herfarth1,2,3,4,8, J Debus1,2,3,4,8,9, U Haberkorn4,5,6,10, S A Koerber11,12,13,14.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Quinoline-based ligands targeting cancer-associated fibroblasts have emerged as promising radiopharmaceuticals in different tumor entities. The aim of this retrospective study was to explore the potential of FAPI-PET/CT in the initial staging of esophageal cancer patients and its usefulness in radiotherapy planning as a first clinical analysis.Entities:
Keywords: Esophageal cancer; FAPI; Fibroblast activation protein; Oncological management; PET
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33063132 PMCID: PMC7666016 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-020-01548-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Imaging Biol ISSN: 1536-1632 Impact factor: 3.488
Patient characteristics
| Age (years) | |
| Median | 63.5 |
| Range | 57.8–82.8 |
| Sex | |
| Male | 5 |
| Female | 2 |
| Histology | |
| SCC | 6 |
| AC | 1 |
| T stage | |
| Tx | 1 |
| T2 | 1 |
| T3 | 3 |
| T4 | 2 |
| N stage | |
| N0 | 4 |
| N1 | 2 |
| N2 | 1 |
| Treatment concept | |
| Neoadjuvant therapy | 1 |
| Definitive therapy | 6 |
| Gross tumor volume (GTV) | (cm3; median (range)) |
| Standard CT scan | 34.25 (13.27–106.9) |
| Considering FAPI-PET | 37.73 (13.82–106.9) |
Standard uptake values (average)
| Site | SUVmax | SUVmean |
|---|---|---|
| Primary tumor | 16.48 | 8.61 |
| Lymph node metastases | 9.73 | 5.06 |
| Brain | 0.16 | 0.05 |
| Oral mucosa | 1.98 | 1.26 |
| Parotis | 1.82 | 1.16 |
| Thyroid | 2.64 | 1.39 |
| Lung | 0.56 | 0.37 |
| Myocardium | 1.67 | 0.90 |
| Blood pool | 1.60 | 1.17 |
| Liver | 1.51 | 0.83 |
| Pancreas | 2.32 | 1.47 |
| Spleen | 1.56 | 1.03 |
| Kidney | 1.97 | 1.19 |
| Intestine | 0.88 | 0.48 |
| Muscle | 1.52 | 1.04 |
| Fat | 0.63 | 0.36 |
| Spinal canal | 0.67 | 0.50 |
| Bone | 1.10 | 0.57 |
Fig. 1.FAPI-guide radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boots (c, d) to FAPI-positive lymph node metastases (a, b).
Fig. 2.Patient with clipping of proximal and distal tumor margins (e–g) and correlating FAPI uptake (b–d). MIP (a) demonstrated non-malignant FAPI uptake within a cardiac scar after heart attack (*) and within pancreas to chronic pancreatitis (**).