Literature DB >> 36222855

Prognostic value of fibroblast activation protein expressing tumor volume calculated from [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Liang Zhao1,2, Yizhen Pang1,2, Shanyu Chen2, Jianhao Chen1,2, Yimin Li2, Yifeng Yu2, Chunbin Huang3, Long Sun1, Hua Wu1, Haojun Chen4, Qin Lin5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of semiquantitative parameters derived from [68 Ga]Ga-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) PET/CT for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis on patients from a prospective parent study (NCT04416165). A total of 45 patients with locally advanced ESCC who underwent [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI from December 2019 to March 2021 were included. The maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax), gross tumor volume (GTV), and total lesion-FAPI (TL-FAPI) of the primary tumor were calculated from the corresponding PET/CT image. Unpaired parameters were compared using Student's t test or the Mann-Whitney U test. Paired parameters were compared using the paired t test or the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to calculate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates, and Cox regression analysis was performed to determine which PET/CT parameters were prognostic factors for PFS and/or OS.
RESULTS: Thirty-four of the 45 patients met the criteria, and the median follow-up time was 24 months (16-29 months). SUVmax-FAPI, GTVFAPI, and TL-FAPI in patients with stage T4 tumors were significantly higher than those in patients with stage T2/T3 tumors (all P < 0.01). In the univariate Cox regression analysis, T stage, N stage, GTVFAPI, and TL-FAPI were associated with PFS, and T stage, GTVFAPI, and TL-FAPI were associated with OS. Upon multivariable analysis, GTVFAPI was an independent prognostic factor for both PFS (hazard ratio (HR), 5.76; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.13-15.57, P = 0.001) and OS (HR, 4.96; 95% CI, 2.55-18.79, P = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: This pilot study revealed that [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT may have prognostic value for patients with ESCC treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. It may aid in personalized patient management by steering treatment modifications before therapy. Prospective studies with larger samples and longer observation periods are needed.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; Fibroblast activation protein inhibitor; Gross tumor volume; PET/CT; Prognosis

Year:  2022        PMID: 36222855     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05989-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   10.057


  38 in total

1.  Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration: clinical staging data.

Authors:  T W Rice; C Apperson-Hansen; L M DiPaola; M E Semple; T E M R Lerut; M B Orringer; L-Q Chen; W L Hofstetter; B M Smithers; V W Rusch; B P L Wijnhoven; K N Chen; A R Davies; X B D'Journo; K A Kesler; J D Luketich; M K Ferguson; J V Räsänen; R van Hillegersberg; W Fang; L Durand; W H Allum; I Cecconello; R J Cerfolio; M Pera; S M Griffin; R Burger; J-F Liu; M S Allen; S Law; T J Watson; G E Darling; W J Scott; A Duranceau; C E Denlinger; P H Schipper; H Ishwaran; E H Blackstone
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.429

Review 2.  Epidemiology of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Christian C Abnet; Melina Arnold; Wen-Qiang Wei
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI histogram parameters predict progression-free survival in patients with advanced esophageal squamous carcinoma receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Lulu Xu; Xiaolin Ge; Nana Sun; Xisheng Liu
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 1.990

4.  Chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced esophageal cancer: long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized trial (RTOG 85-01). Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.

Authors:  J S Cooper; M D Guo; A Herskovic; J S Macdonald; J A Martenson; M Al-Sarraf; R Byhardt; A H Russell; J J Beitler; S Spencer; S O Asbell; M V Graham; L L Leichman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-05-05       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.

Authors:  Hyuna Sung; Jacques Ferlay; Rebecca L Siegel; Mathieu Laversanne; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Ahmedin Jemal; Freddie Bray
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 6.  Personalizing oncology: perspectives and prospects.

Authors:  John Mendelsohn
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Textural features based enhanced contrast CT images predicts prognosis to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage III esophageal squamous cell cancer.

Authors:  Yuquan Xie; Qifeng Wang; Baorong Cao; Jiahua Lv; Yi Wang; Lei Wu; Mingqiang Dong; Tao Li
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 4.388

8.  Importance of surveillance and success of salvage strategies after definitive chemoradiation in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Kazuki Sudo; Lianchun Xiao; Roopma Wadhwa; Hironori Shiozaki; Elena Elimova; Takashi Taketa; Mariela A Blum; Jeffrey H Lee; Manoop S Bhutani; Brian Weston; William A Ross; Ritsuko Komaki; David C Rice; Stephen G Swisher; Wayne L Hofstetter; Dipen M Maru; Heath D Skinner; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Is the new distribution of early esophageal adenocarcinoma stages improving the prognostic prediction of the 8th edition of the TNM staging system for esophageal cancer?

Authors:  Ran Mo; Chen Chen; Liang Pan; Ao Yu; Dongjin Wang; Tao Wang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Intrathoracic vs Cervical Anastomosis After Totally or Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Frans van Workum; Moniek H P Verstegen; Bastiaan R Klarenbeek; Stefan A W Bouwense; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Freek Daams; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Gerjon Hannink; Jan Willem Haveman; Joos Heisterkamp; Walther Jansen; Ewout A Kouwenhoven; Jan J B van Lanschot; Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen; Donald L van der Peet; Fatih Polat; Sander Ubels; Bas P L Wijnhoven; Maroeska M Rovers; Camiel Rosman
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.