| Literature DB >> 33055097 |
Qingqing Wang1,2, Erin G Conlon3, James L Manley3, Donald C Rio1,2.
Abstract
The GGGGCC hexanucleotide expansion in C9orf72 (C9) is the most frequent known cause of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), yet a clear understanding of how C9 fits into the broader context of ALS/FTD pathology has remained lacking. The repetitive RNA derived from the C9 repeat is known to sequester hnRNPH, a splicing regulator, into insoluble aggregates, resulting in aberrant alternative splicing. Furthermore, hnRNPH insolubility and altered splicing of a robust set of targets have been observed to correlate in C9 and sporadic ALS/FTD patients alike, suggesting that changes along this axis are a core feature of disease pathogenesis. Here, we characterize previously uncategorized RNA splicing defects involving widespread intron retention affecting almost 2000 transcripts in C9ALS/FTD brains exhibiting a high amount of sequestered, insoluble hnRNPH. These intron retention events appear not to alter overall expression levels of the affected transcripts but rather the protein-coding regions. These retained introns affect transcripts in multiple cellular pathways predicted to be involved in C9 as well as sporadic ALS/FTD etiology, including the proteasomal and autophagy systems. The retained intron pre-mRNAs display a number of characteristics, including enrichment of hnRNPH-bound splicing enhancer motifs and a propensity for G-quadruplex (G-Q) formation, linking the defective splicing directly to high amounts of sequestered hnRNPH. Together, our results reveal previously undetected splicing defects in high insoluble hnRNPH-associated C9ALS brains, suggesting a feedback between effective RNA-binding protein dosage and protein quality control in C9, and perhaps all, ALS/FTD.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33055097 PMCID: PMC7706729 DOI: 10.1101/gr.265298.120
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genome Res ISSN: 1088-9051 Impact factor: 9.043
Patient sample information
| Sample | RNA-seq ID | Sex | Clinical diagnosis | Age at death | Disease duration | % Insoluble hnRNPH | Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C91 | CGND HRA 00714 | F | ALS | 64 | 1–1.5 yr | 87.2 | C9high |
| C92 | CGND HRA 00728 | F | ALS | 64 | 0.5 yr | 56 | C9low |
| C93 | CGND HRA 00715 | F | ALS | 58 | 1–1.5 yr | 94.7 | C9high |
| C94 | CGND HRA 00730 | M | ALS-FTD | 60 | 0.5–1 yr | 41.3 | C9low |
| C95 | CGND HRA 00729 | F | ALS | 65 | 7–7.5 yr | 89.2 | C9high |
| C96 | CGND HRA 00716 | M | ALS | 73 | 4.5 yr | 37.2 | C9low |
| C98 | CGND HRA 00726 | M | ALS | 59 | 1 yr | 81.8 | C9high |
| C99 | CGND HRA 00718 | M | ALS | 70 | <2 yr | 15.8 | C9low |
| C910 | CGND HRA 00453 | F | FTD | 75 | 9 yr | 95.3 | C9high |
| C911 | CGND HRA 00719 | M | ALS-FTD | 73 | 2 yr | 89.5 | C9high |
| C912 | CGND HRA 00720 | F | ALS | 57 | 1 yr | 33.2 | C9low |
| C913 | CGND HRA 00713 | F | ALS-FTD | 68 | 6 yr | 27 | C9low |
| C916 | CGND HRA 00707 | F | ALS-FTD | 68 | 6 yr | 40.3 | C9low |
| non6 | CGND HRA 00206 | F | Non-neurological control | 54 | n/a | n/a | Control |
| non9 | CGND HRA 00721 | F | Non-neurological control | 90+ | n/a | n/a | Control |
| non10 | CGND HRA 00077 | F | Non-neurological control | 90+ | n/a | n/a | Control |
| non11 | CGND HRA 00197 | F | Non-neurological control | 70 | n/a | n/a | Control |
| non12 | CGND HRA 00196 | F | Non-neurological control | 52 | n/a | n/a | Control |
| non13 | CGND HRA 00753 | M | Non-neurological control | 89 | n/a | n/a | Control |
Figure 1.Widespread, elevated intron retention is observed in C9high patient brain samples. (A) Number of significantly differentially spliced AS events in six AS categories comparing C9high patient samples with normal controls and C9low patient samples with normal controls, respectively. (B) Volcano plot showing the magnitude and direction of changes in intron retention for a total of 3177 changed intron retention events between C9high patient samples and normal controls. X-axis shows the difference of intron-retained isoform levels between normal controls and C9high patient samples. (C) Volcano plot showing the magnitude and direction of changes in intron retention between C9low patient samples and normal controls. (D,E) Sashimi plot and genome browser shots for two significantly elevated intron retention events in two gene transcripts, HNRNPH1 and PSMA3. Exon coverage from RNA-seq data is shown in three normal control samples (blue) and three C9high samples (red); arcs represent splice junctions identified from the RNA-seq data and the number of uniquely mapped RNA-seq reads mapped to the junctions are shown across the arc; human annotation (hg38) of the transcripts is shown at the bottom. The black arrow indicates the direction of the promoter. The dotted lines indicate the region of the transcript that is enlarged to highlight the retained intron region.
Figure 2.Prevalent, elevated intron retention in C9high patient samples does not change overall gene expression levels of the affected transcripts. (A) Heat map of the changed intron retention levels for 3177 introns (column), comparison across six normal control samples and six C9high patient samples. Magnitude and direction of changes in intron retention between normal controls and C9 samples are color-coded. (B) Volcano plot showing the overall expression level changes in genes that undergo significantly elevated intron retention. X-axis shows fold changes in gene expression level between normal controls and C9high patient samples. (C) Box plot showing intron length distribution between introns that are more retained in C9high patient samples, introns that are more retained in normal controls, and all introns detected in the brain samples. (D) Box plot showing intron CG content comparison between introns that are more retained in C9high patient samples, introns that are more retained in normal controls, and all introns detected in the brain samples.
Figure 3.Transcripts that undergo significantly changed intron retention in C9high patient samples encode proteins functionally enriched in cellular protein quality control pathways. (A) Gene Ontology enrichment analysis of transcripts that undergo significantly changed intron retention in C9high patient samples compared to normal controls. (B) Volcano plots showing the magnitude and direction of changes in intron retention for introns embedded in transcripts that encode proteins functioning in the proteasomal pathway, the autophagy pathway, and the splicing regulatory pathway, respectively.
Summary of elevated intron retention events in C9high patient samples compared to normal controls that affect transcripts encoding subunits of the proteasome machinery
| Gene | Basic molecular function | # of IR events | Effect from IR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proteasome (prosoma, macropain) subunit, alpha type, 3 | 3 | IR 1: C terminus truncation | |
| Proteasome (prosoma, macropain) subunit, alpha type, 4 | 2 | IR 1: Complete coding protein change | |
| Proteasome (prosoma, macropain) subunit, alpha type, 7 | 1 | IR: C terminus truncation | |
| Proteasome (prosoma, macropain) subunit, beta type, 4 | 2 | IR 1: C terminus truncation and change | |
| Proteasome (prosoma, macropain) subunit, beta type, 10 | 1 | IR: C terminus truncation and change | |
| Proteasome (prosoma, macropain) 26s subunit, atpase type, 3 | 1 | IR: C terminus change | |
| Proteasome (prosoma, macropain) 26s subunit, atpase type, 4 | 1 | IR: C terminus truncation and change | |
| Proteasome (prosoma, macropain) 26s subunit, alpha type, 5 | 2 | IR 1: C terminus truncation and change | |
| Proteasome (prosoma, macropain) 26s subunit, alpha type, 6 | 1 | IR: C terminus truncation and change | |
| Proteasome (prosoma, macropain) 26s subunit, non-atpase, 3 | 1 | IR: C terminus truncation and change | |
| Proteasome (prosoma, macropain) 26s subunit, non-atpase, 6 | 1 | IR: C terminus truncation and change | |
| Proteasome (prosoma, macropain) 26s subunit, non-atpase, 7 | 1 | IR: C terminus truncation and change | |
| Proteasome (prosoma, macropain) 26s subunit, non-atpase, 11 | 2 | IR 1: C terminus truncation and change | |
| Proteasome (prosoma, macropain) 26s subunit, non-atpase, 13 | 1 | IR: C terminus truncation | |
| Proteasome (prosoma, macropain) activator subunit 1 (pa28 alpha) | 1 | IR: C terminus truncation and change | |
| Proteasome (prosoma, macropain) activator subunit 2 (pa28 beta) | 3 | IR 1: C terminus truncation and change | |
| Proteasome (prosoma, macropain) activator subunit 4 | 1 | IR: C terminus truncation and change |
Figure 4.Introns that are significantly more retained in C9high patient samples are enriched in hnRNPH-associated intronic splicing enhancer motif activities. (A) Cumulative distribution function plot showing the fraction of introns with at least one NGGG + N motif at the designated intronic position (bp) downstream from the 5′ splice site (x-axis showing a total of 0–100 bp downstream from the 5′ splice site) for six groups of introns. (B) Cumulative distribution function plot showing the fraction of introns with at least one NGGG + N motif of four and more Gs in the poly(G) tract at the designated intronic position (bp) downstream from the 5′ splice site for six groups of introns. (C) Cumulative distribution function plot showing the fraction of introns with at least four non-overlapping NGGG + N motifs at the designated intronic position (bp) downstream from the 5′ splice site for six groups of introns.
Figure 5.Cumulative distribution function plot showing the fraction of introns with at least one hnRNPH binding site at the designated intronic position (bp) downstream from the 5′ splice site (x-axis showing a total of 0–100 bp downstream from the 5′ splice site) for three groups of introns.