| Literature DB >> 33054745 |
Chunfang Zhao1, Ling Zhao1, Qingyong Zhao1, Tao Chen1, Shu Yao1, Zhen Zhu1, Lihui Zhou1, Altafhusian B Nadaf2, Wenhua Liang1, Kai Lu1, Yadong Zhang3, Cailin Wang4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Eating and cooking qualities (ECQs) of rice (Oryza sativa L.) determine consumer acceptance and the economic value of rice varieties. The starch physicochemical properties, i.e. amylose content, gel consistency, gelatinization temperature and pasting viscosity are important indices for evaluating rice ECQs. Genetic factors are required for development of rice varieties with excellent ECQs and association mapping is one of the promising approaches for discovering such associated genetic factors.Entities:
Keywords: Association mapping; Eating and cooking quality; Population structure; Rice (Oryza sativa L.); Subpopulation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33054745 PMCID: PMC7556922 DOI: 10.1186/s12863-020-00922-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genet ISSN: 1471-2156 Impact factor: 2.797
Fig. 1Population structure and divergence of 253 rice cultivars. a The mean LnP(D) changed with the number of subgroups. b The ΔK value changed with the number of subgroups. c Neighbor-joining tree constructed from simple matching distance of all markers. Red, japonica; green, indica. d Comparison of allele frequencies between indica and japonica. For each marker, we identified the minor allele across all landraces and then calculated the frequency of this allele in indica and japonica. e PCA plots of the first two components of 253 rice cultivars
Fig. 2The analysis of population structure and phylogenetic relationship in indica and japonica subpopulations. a-b The mean LnP(D) (a) and ΔK value (b) calculated in the indica subpopulation. c-d The mean LnP(D) (c) and ΔK value (d) calculated in japonica subpopulation. e-f The Neighbor-joining tree constructed from 81 individuals in indica subpopulation (e) and 172 individuals in japonica subpopulation (f)
Year wise comparative phenotypic performance in terms of eating and cooking qualities in the whole population and two subpopulations of cultivated rice
| Trait | Year | Whole population | Difference (%) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Range | CV% | Mean ± SD | Range | CV% | Mean ± SD | Range | CV% | |||
| AC (%) | 2015 | 17.3 ± 4.4 | 8.0 ~ 28.5 | 25.4 | 21.3 ± 5.3 | 12.5 ~ 28.5 | 24.9 | 15.3 ± 1.93 | 8.0 ~ 19.0 | 12.6 | 28.1** |
| 2016 | 17.7 ± 5.3 | 8.0 ~ 30.9 | 29.9 | 22.7 ± 6.2 | 12.3 ~ 30.9 | 27.3 | 15.3 ± 2.2 | 8.0 ~ 19.8 | 14.4 | 32.7** | |
| ns | ns | ns | |||||||||
| GC (mm) | 2015 | 70.6 ± 19.7 | 25.0 ~ 122.0 | 27.9 | 58.2 ± 25.4 | 25.0 ~ 122.0 | 43.6 | 76.6 ± 12.5 | 44.0 ~ 113.0 | 16.3 | −31.7** |
| 2016 | 69.3 ± 21.0 | 25.5 ~ 103.5 | 30.3 | 55.0 ± 27.4 | 25.5 ~ 103.5 | 49.8 | 76.3 ± 11.9 | 48.0 ~ 99.5 | 15.6 | −38.7** | |
| ns | ns | ns | |||||||||
| ASV (grade) | 2015 | 4.6 ± 1.6 | 1.0 ~ 7.0 | 34.8 | 4.0 ± 1.8 | 1.0 ~ 7.0 | 45 | 4.9 ± 1.3 | 2.0 ~ 6.5 | 26.5 | − 21.8** |
| 2016 | 3.2 ± 1.4 | 1.0 ~ 7.0 | 43.8 | 2.8 ± 1.4 | 1.1 ~ 7.0 | 50 | 3.4 ± 1.3 | 1.0 ~ 6.0 | 38.2 | −21.3** | |
| ** | ** | ** | |||||||||
| PV (RVU) | 2015 | 219.6 ± 35.1 | 122.3 ~ 306.4 | 16.0 | 240.2 ± 38.0 | 122.3 ~ 306.4 | 15.8 | 209.6 ± 28.8 | 139.6 ~ 296.7 | 13.7 | 12.7** |
| 2016 | 230.2 ± 36.8 | 98.8 ~ 304.4 | 16.0 | 245.1 ± 41.0 | 98.8 ~ 304.4 | 16.7 | 222.9 ± 32.3 | 123.0 ~ 284.3 | 14.5 | 9.1** | |
| ** | ns | ** | |||||||||
| HPV (RVU) | 2015 | 105.1 ± 32.5 | 47.7 ~ 214.0 | 30.9 | 130.7 ± 35.8 | 67.4 ~ 214.0 | 27.4 | 92.7 ± 21.7 | 47.7 ~ 157.6 | 23.4 | 29.1** |
| 2016 | 142.1 ± 38.4 | 39.3 ~ 246.3 | 27.0 | 157.7 ± 42.3 | 69.6 ~ 246.3 | 26.8 | 134.5 ± 33.9 | 39.3 ~ 212.5 | 25.2 | 14.7** | |
| ** | ** | ** | |||||||||
| CPV (RVU) | 2015 | 203.8 ± 61.6 | 71.4 ~ 415.5 | 30.2 | 261.5 ± 68.3 | 164.2 ~ 415.5 | 26.1 | 175.6 ± 31.1 | 71.4 ~ 244.2 | 17.7 | 32.8** |
| 2016 | 224.7 ± 52.0 | 77.7 ~ 354.9 | 23.1 | 259.3 ± 56.2 | 169.5 ~ 354.9 | 21.7 | 207.7 ± 40.2 | 77.7 ~ 296.8 | 19.4 | 19.9** | |
| ** | ns | ** | |||||||||
| BDV (RVU) | 2015 | 114.5 ± 26.8 | 36.5 ~ 194.2 | 23.4 | 109.5 ± 37.0 | 36.5 ~ 194.2 | 33.8 | 117.0 ± 19.6 | 70.5 ~ 179.0 | 16.8 | −6.9* |
| 2016 | 88.1 ± 31.0 | 26.5 ~ 177.0 | 35.2 | 87.4 ± 39.6 | 29.2 ~ 177.0 | 45.3 | 88.5 ± 26.0 | 26.5 ~ 162.4 | 29.4 | −1.20 | |
| ** | ** | ** | |||||||||
| SBV (RVU) | 2015 | −15.9 ± 54.09 | − 152.3 ~ 165.6 | 340.0 | 21.3 ± 72.8 | − 120.3 ~ 165.6 | 341.8 | −34.0 ± 28.0 | −152.3 ~ 33.1 | 82.4 | 259.6** |
| 2016 | −5.5 ± 44.8 | − 125.4 ~ 95.08 | 814.5 | 14.2 ± 57.6 | −107.5 ~ 95.1 | 405.6 | −15.2 ± 33.2 | − 125.4 ~ 51.3 | 218.4 | 206.8** | |
| * | ns | ** | |||||||||
| CSV (RVU) | 2015 | 98.7 ± 35.2 | 0.1 ~ 242.6 | 35.7 | 130.7 ± 41.1 | 73.8 ~ 242.6 | 31.4 | 83.0 ± 16.4 | 0.1 ~ 110.7 | 19.5 | 36.5** |
| 2016 | 82.6 ± 21.8 | 37.0 ~ 149.8 | 26.4 | 101.6 ± 23.4 | 64.0 ~ 149.8 | 23 | 73.3 ± 13.3 | 37.0 ~ 98.3 | 18.1 | 27.9** | |
| ** | ** | ** | |||||||||
| PeT (min) | 2015 | 5.9 ± 0.4 | 3.5 ~ 6.7 | 6.8 | 5.9 ± 0.5 | 3.5–6.7 | 8.5 | 5.9 ± 0.3 | 5.1 ~ 6.6 | 5.1 | −0.4 |
| 2016 | 6.2 ± 0.4 | 5.1 ~ 7.0 | 6.5 | 6.1 ± 0.3 | 5.4–6.8 | 4.9 | 6.2 ± 0.4 | 5.1 ~ 7.0 | 6.5 | −1.10 | |
| ** | ** | ** | |||||||||
| Ptemp (°C) | 2015 | 75.0 ± 4.1 | 68.1 ~ 88.6 | 5.5 | 78.0 ± 4.0 | 68.8 ~ 87.8 | 5.1 | 73.5 ± 3.2 | 68.1 ~ 88.6 | 4.4 | 5.8** |
| 2016 | 76.6 ± 3.9 | 68.8 ~ 90.2 | 5.1 | 78.7 ± 4.3 | 68.8 ~ 90.2 | 5.5 | 75.5 ± 3.1 | 68.8 ~ 85.5 | 4.1 | 4.0** | |
| ** | ns | ** | |||||||||
** and * indicate significance at P = 0.01 and P = 0.05, respectively; ns not significant, CV Coefficient of variation
Determination of loci for eating and cooking qualities in indica subpopulation
| Traits | Associated Markers | Position (kb) | Chr. | MAF | 2015 | 2016 | Linked Gene | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC | RM170 | 1361 | 6 | 0.099 | 4.47E-06 | 7.67 | 6.74E-07 | 7.93 | |
| RM588 | 1612 | 6 | 0.025 | 3.29E-18 | 17.24 | 7.85E-18 | 15.83 | ||
| Wx-S1 | 1765 | 6 | 0.346 | 3.53E-11 | 10.93 | 3.03E-10 | 9.4 | ||
| Wx-S2 | 1765 | 6 | 0.012 | 1.35E-06 | 9.45 | 2.97E-06 | 8.43 | (CT)n in | |
| GC | RM170 | 1361 | 6 | 0.099 | 1.83E-05 | 4.97 | |||
| RM588 | 1612 | 6 | 0.025 | 7.77E-06 | 7.92 | 2.06E-08 | 7.15 | ||
| Wx-S1 | 1765 | 6 | 0.346 | 3.84E-04 | 2.71 | ||||
| Wx-S2 | 1765 | 6 | 0.012 | 7.30E-04 | 4.43 | (CT)n in | |||
| ASV | SSIIa-S1 | 6747 | 6 | 0.457 | 3.10E-10 | 17.0 | 2.30E-04 | 7.83 | |
| SSIIa-S2 | 6747 | 6 | 0.012 | 2.71E-09 | 17.04 | ||||
| PV | RM588 | 1612 | 6 | 0.025 | 3.91E-04 | 8.48 | |||
| Wx-S2 | 1765 | 6 | 0.012 | 9.84E-04 | 8.97 | 5.84E-04 | 9.89 | (CT)n in | |
| RM412 | 30,328 | 6 | 0.438 | 3.51E-04 | 6.07 | ||||
| RM346 | 21,579 | 7 | 0.012 | 4.74E-04 | 8.22 | ||||
| BDV | RM170 | 1361 | 6 | 0.099 | 5.13E-04 | 5.72 | 7.45E-04 | 5.39 | |
| RM588 | 1612 | 6 | 0.025 | 8.79E-08 | 10.45 | 2.41E-05 | 7.41 | ||
| Wx-S1 | 1765 | 6 | 0.346 | 8.81E-05 | 4.99 | ||||
| CPV | RM170 | 1361 | 6 | 0.099 | 4.18E-06 | 7.62 | 7.38E-05 | 5.98 | |
| SBV | RM170 | 1361 | 6 | 0.099 | 1.91E-06 | 7.26 | 7.92E-06 | 6.55 | |
| RM588 | 1612 | 6 | 0.025 | 4.42E-10 | 10.45 | 3.24E-08 | 8.96 | ||
| Wx-S1 | 1765 | 6 | 0.346 | 5.18E-06 | 5.37 | 3.26E-05 | 4.49 | ||
| Wx-S2 | 1765 | 6 | 0.012 | 9.26E-04 | 5.48 | (CT)n in | |||
| RM225 | 3417 | 6 | 0.013 | 6.40E-04 | 4.6 | ||||
| CSV | RM170 | 1361 | 6 | 0.099 | 4.73E-06 | 8.23 | 8.80E-04 | 6.24 | |
| RM588 | 1612 | 6 | 0.025 | 4.57E-06 | 8.38 | 1.08E-05 | 9.42 | ||
| Wx-S1 | 1765 | 6 | 0.346 | 2.47E-04 | 4.37 | 4.10E-04 | 4.78 | ||
| RM3262 | 22,469 | 8 | 0.012 | 3.92E-04 | 4.09 | ||||
| RM216 | 5336 | 10 | 0.069 | 7.89E-04 | 5.27 | ||||
| PeT | RM488 | 24,808 | 1 | 0.013 | 1.06E-05 | 12.93 | |||
| RM5473 | 31,676 | 4 | 0.075 | 5.11E-06 | 14.29 | ||||
| SSI-S1 | 3080 | 6 | 0.431 | 1.19E-08 | 17.82 | ||||
| SSIIa-S2 | 6747 | 6 | 0.012 | 8.14E-04 | 7.96 | ||||
| RM189 | 22,095 | 9 | 0.073 | 3.04E-05 | 11.8 | ||||
MAF Minor allele frequency
R represents the proportion of phenotypic variation explained by each associated locus
Determination of loci for eating and cooking qualities in japonica subpopulation
| Traits | Associated Markers | Position (kb) | Chr. | MAF | 2015 | 2016 | Linked Gene | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC | Wx-S3 | 1765 | 6 | 0.058 | 1.81E-25 | 21.86 | 3.12E-28 | 20.87 | |
| RM550 | 12,464 | 2 | 0.353 | 9.36E-06 | 5.14 | 1.40E-05 | 4.39 | ||
| ASV | SSIIa-S1 | 6747 | 6 | 0.035 | 3.84E-04 | 3.55 | |||
| SSIIa-S2 | 6747 | 6 | 0.029 | 4.27E-05 | 5.56 | ||||
| RM5331 | 7177 | 6 | 0.052 | 3.54E-04 | 3.6 | ||||
| RM1375 | 16,716 | 10 | 0.012 | 9.23E-04 | 5.39 | ||||
| PV | RM302 | 32,988 | 1 | 0.006 | 7.44E-04 | 3.54 | |||
| RM5791 | 10,747 | 2 | 0.012 | 5.27E-04 | 2.59 | ||||
| RM420 | 30,092 | 7 | 0.017 | 9.88E-04 | 2.92 | ||||
| HPV | SBE4-S2 | 20,238 | 4 | 0.012 | 4.56E-05 | 5.04 | |||
| AGPLar | 28,877 | 5 | 0.006 | 3.84E-04 | 4.87 | ||||
| Wx-S3 | 1765 | 6 | 0.058 | 3.19E-04 | 3.97 | 9.00E-04 | 2.58 | ||
| STS9–1 | 10,861 | 9 | 0.012 | 3.28E-04 | 3.96 | ||||
| BDV | Wx-S3 | 1765 | 6 | 0.058 | 8.16E-05 | 4.43 | |||
| RM276 | 6230 | 6 | 0.012 | 8.38E-04 | 4.79 | ||||
| CPV | SBE4-S2 | 20,238 | 4 | 0.012 | 2.50E-04 | 4.34 | |||
| Wx-S3 | 1765 | 6 | 0.058 | 1.22E-10 | 12.05 | 3.17E-07 | 6.34 | ||
| SBV | RM550 | 12,464 | 2 | 0.353 | 8.93E-05 | 4.46 | |||
| Wx-S3 | 1765 | 6 | 0.058 | 4.53E-08 | 8.11 | 7.74E-10 | 9.37 | ||
| RM336 | 21,872 | 7 | 0.018 | 3.67E-04 | 6.05 | ||||
| CSV | RM550 | 12,464 | 2 | 0.353 | 3.49E-04 | 4.03 | |||
| Wx-S3 | 1765 | 6 | 0.058 | 5.20E-14 | 15.48 | 1.71E-11 | 12.36 | ||
| PeT | SBE4-S2 | 20,238 | 4 | 0.012 | 8.65E-04 | 3.45 | |||
| Wx-S3 | 1765 | 6 | 0.058 | 4.78E-06 | 6.32 | 2.93E-05 | 4.73 | ||
| RM276 | 6230 | 6 | 0.012 | 2.79E-05 | 6.42 | ||||
| Ptemp | SSIIIb-S1 | 31,759 | 4 | 0.017 | 1.82E-06 | 7.51 | |||
| RM276 | 6230 | 6 | 0.012 | 2.73E-05 | 6.85 | 7.12E-10 | 9.12 | ||
| SSIIa-S1 | 6747 | 6 | 0.035 | 6.06E-05 | 3.48 | ||||
| SSIIa-S2 | 6747 | 6 | 0.029 | 3.68E-07 | 6.17 | ||||
| RM5688 | 1716 | 9 | 0.006 | 9.46E-05 | 4.52 | ||||
MAF: Minor allele frequency
R represents the proportion of phenotypic variation explained by each associated locus
Fig. 3The distribution of association loci for eating and cooking qualities in 12 chromosomes of rice. The blue and brown boxes indicated the loci detected in indica and japonica subpopulations, respectively