Literature DB >> 33039428

The role of computational methods for automating and improving clinical target volume definition.

Jan Unkelbach1, Thomas Bortfeld2, Carlos E Cardenas3, Vincent Gregoire4, Wille Hager5, Ben Heijmen6, Robert Jeraj7, Stine S Korreman8, Roman Ludwig9, Bertrand Pouymayou9, Nadya Shusharina2, Jonas Söderberg10, Iuliana Toma-Dasu5, Esther G C Troost11, Eliana Vasquez Osorio12.   

Abstract

Treatment planning in radiotherapy distinguishes three target volume concepts: the gross tumor volume (GTV), the clinical target volume (CTV), and the planning target volume (PTV). Over time, GTV definition and PTV margins have improved through the development of novel imaging techniques and better image guidance, respectively. CTV definition is sometimes considered the weakest element in the planning process. CTV definition is particularly complex since the extension of microscopic disease cannot be seen using currently available in-vivo imaging techniques. Instead, CTV definition has to incorporate knowledge of the patterns of tumor progression. While CTV delineation has largely been considered the domain of radiation oncologists, this paper, arising from a 2019 ESTRO Physics research workshop, discusses the contributions that medical physics and computer science can make by developing computational methods to support CTV definition. First, we overview the role of image segmentation algorithms, which may in part automate CTV delineation through segmentation of lymph node stations or normal tissues representing anatomical boundaries of microscopic tumor progression. The recent success of deep convolutional neural networks has also enabled learning entire CTV delineations from examples. Second, we discuss the use of mathematical models of tumor progression for CTV definition, using as example the application of glioma growth models to facilitate GTV-to-CTV expansion for glioblastoma that is consistent with neuroanatomy. We further consider statistical machine learning models to quantify lymphatic metastatic progression of tumors, which may eventually improve elective CTV definition. Lastly, we discuss approaches to incorporate uncertainty in CTV definition into treatment plan optimization as well as general limitations of the CTV concept in the case of infiltrating tumors without natural boundaries.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automatic image segmentation; Clinical target volume; Computational tumor growth models

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33039428     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  6 in total

Review 1.  Adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Pablo Botas; Gregory C Sharp; Brian Winey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Deep learning-based GTV contouring modeling inter- and intra- observer variability in sarcomas.

Authors:  Thibault Marin; Yue Zhuo; Rita Maria Lahoud; Fei Tian; Xiaoyue Ma; Fangxu Xing; Maryam Moteabbed; Xiaofeng Liu; Kira Grogg; Nadya Shusharina; Jonghye Woo; Ruth Lim; Chao Ma; Yen-Lin E Chen; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Comprehensive Quantitative Evaluation of Variability in Magnetic Resonance-Guided Delineation of Oropharyngeal Gross Tumor Volumes and High-Risk Clinical Target Volumes: An R-IDEAL Stage 0 Prospective Study.

Authors:  Carlos E Cardenas; Sanne E Blinde; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Sweet Ping Ng; Cornelis Raaijmakers; Marielle Philippens; Alexis Kotte; Abrahim A Al-Mamgani; Irene Karam; David J Thomson; Jared Robbins; Kate Newbold; Clifton D Fuller; Chris Terhaard
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 8.013

4.  Method of computing direction-dependent margins for the development of consensus contouring guidelines.

Authors:  Liam S P Lawrence; Lee C L Chin; Rachel W Chan; Timothy K Nguyen; Arjun Sahgal; Chia-Lin Tseng; Angus Z Lau
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Orthotopic Glioblastoma Models for Evaluation of the Clinical Target Volume Concept.

Authors:  Rebecca Bütof; Pia Hönscheid; Rozina Aktar; Christian Sperling; Falk Tillner; Treewut Rassamegevanon; Antje Dietrich; Matthias Meinhardt; Daniela Aust; Mechthild Krause; Esther G C Troost
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 6.  Molecular Biology in Treatment Decision Processes-Neuro-Oncology Edition.

Authors:  Andra V Krauze; Kevin Camphausen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.