| Literature DB >> 36230481 |
Rebecca Bütof1,2,3,4, Pia Hönscheid3,5,6, Rozina Aktar1,5, Christian Sperling3,6, Falk Tillner1,2,4, Treewut Rassamegevanon1,5, Antje Dietrich1,5, Matthias Meinhardt6, Daniela Aust3,6, Mechthild Krause1,2,3,4,5, Esther G C Troost1,2,3,4,5.
Abstract
In times of high-precision radiotherapy, the accurate and precise definition of the primary tumor localization and its microscopic spread is of enormous importance. In glioblastoma, the microscopic tumor extension is uncertain and, therefore, population-based margins for Clinical Target Volume (CTV) definition are clinically used, which could either be too small-leading to increased risk of loco-regional recurrences-or too large, thus, enhancing the probability of normal tissue toxicity. Therefore, the aim of this project is to investigate an individualized definition of the CTV in preclinical glioblastoma models based on specific biological tumor characteristics. The microscopic tumor extensions of two different orthotopic brain tumor models (U87MG_mCherry; G7_mCherry) were evaluated before and during fractionated radiotherapy and correlated with corresponding histological data. Representative tumor slices were analyzed using Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization (MALDI) and stained for putative stem-like cell markers as well as invasion markers. The edges of the tumor are clearly shown by the MALDI segmentation via unsupervised clustering of mass spectra and are consistent with the histologically defined border in H&E staining in both models. MALDI component analysis identified specific peaks as potential markers for normal brain tissue (e.g., 1339 m/z), whereas other peaks demarcated the tumors very well (e.g., 1562 m/z for U87MG_mCherry) irrespective of treatment. MMP14 staining revealed only a few positive cells, mainly in the tumor border, which could reflect the invasive front in both models. The results of this study indicate that MALDI information correlates with microscopic tumor spread in glioblastoma models. Therefore, an individualized CTV definition based on biological tumor characteristics seems possible, whereby the visualization of tumor volume and protein heterogeneity can be potentially used to define radiotherapy-sensitive and resistant areas.Entities:
Keywords: CTV; MALDI; glioblastoma; invasion; orthotopic model
Year: 2022 PMID: 36230481 PMCID: PMC9559695 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14194559
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.575
Figure 1Multimodal analysis of the CTV in a representative untreated brain tumor section of a U87MG mCherry sample. (A) MALDI mass spectrometry image as technique for proteomics analysis measured without staining. GTV is contoured in red within the evaluated region (red box). (B) H&E staining of tumor region. (C) The edges of the tumor are clearly shown by the segmentation of the protein/peptide detection and analysis determined by means of mass spectra. The resulting mass spectrometry data are consistent with the histologic annotation of the tumor. The clustering of the spectra shows a ring-shaped separation. (D) Unsupervised clustering map of mass spectra. (E) Corresponding T1-weighted MR image highlighting the tumor area (white box).
Figure 2Distinguished mass information in one exemplary sample of untreated U87MG-mCherry tumor and normal brain tissue. Principle component analysis of mass spectra demonstrates clusters of similarities and distinctions based on their measurement characteristics, showing a clear separation of tumor and brain tissue (A). Tissue-dependent mass spectra show differences in mass distribution of both tumor (B) and normal tissues (C), e.g., mass 1562.8 m/z as tumor peak ((D); asterisk *), or mass 1339.7 m/z as marker for normal tissue ((E); octothorpe #). The black line (D,E) represents mass spectra of the whole tumor area, whereas the grey line represents mass spectra of the normal brain tissue in the same content area.
Figure 3Intensity maps and blots of mass 1586.8 m/z (upper part: green; lower part: marked with *) in three representative U87MG_mCherry tumors indicate an extension and increase of the mass beyond the tumor margins after irradiation with 3 fractions of 3 Gy within the irradiated volume (arrows, (A/D) + (B/E)), in contrast, no expansion can be seen in untreated tumors (C/F).
Figure 4Different mass peak intensities in one representative U87MG_mCherry tissue section. Invasive front of tumor cells displayed by tumor-specific masses 852, 1459 and 1562 m/z and marked by an arrow showing spreading of tumor cells toward normal tissue. In contrast, two additional tumor masses, 1428 and 1496 m/z, did not show tumor overlapping intensities. Scale bars represent 0.5 mm.
Figure 5IHC staining in one representative tumor of both models (same markers for upper row: U87MG_mCherry, lower row: G7_mCherry, respectively). H&E, Musashi 1, MMP14, Nestin and Ki67 staining and MALDI mass intensity map (914 m/z) of the same tumor region. Intensity relations of spectra are analogous with, e.g., MMP14-rich cell areas in U87MG-mCherry. Scale bars represent 0.5 mm.
Figure 6The intensity blots of tumor-specific masses are presented for differently treated G7_mCherry orthotopic brain tumors. Intensities of tumor masses increased after irradiation with three fractions of 3 Gy, suggesting a more pronounced invasion front after irradiation. Higher radiation doses of six fractions of 3 Gy did not enhance those effects. After irradiation, a broader range of intensities was shown for tumor measurement spots (dots displayed on the right of the box), suggesting a higher range of intratumoral heterogeneity of mass occurrence.