Sophia R Schwarz1, Stefanie Hirsch1, Andreas Hiergeist2, Christian Kirschneck3, Denise Muehler1, Karl-Anton Hiller1, Tim Maisch4, Ali Al-Ahmad5, André Gessner2, Wolfgang Buchalla1, Fabian Cieplik6. 1. Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany. 2. Institute of Clinical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. 3. Department of Orthodontics, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. 4. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. 5. Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Center for Dental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany. 6. Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany. fabian.cieplik@ukr.de.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to investigate the antimicrobial efficacy of antiseptics in saliva-derived microcosm biofilms, and to examine phenotypic adaption of bacteria upon repeated exposure to sub-inhibitory antiseptic concentrations. METHODS: Saliva-derived biofilms were formed mimicking caries- or gingivitis-associated conditions, respectively. Microbial compositions were analyzed by semiconductor-based 16S rRNA sequencing. Biofilms were treated with CHX, CPC, BAC, ALX, and DQC for 1 or 10 min, and colony forming units (CFU) were evaluated. Phenotypic adaptation of six selected bacterial reference strains toward CHX, CPC, and BAC was assessed by measuring minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) over 10 passages of sub-inhibitory exposure. Protein expression profiles were investigated by SDS-PAGE. RESULTS: Both biofilms showed outgrowth of streptococci and Veillonella spp., while gingivitis biofilms also showed increased relative abundances of Actinomyces, Granulicatella, and Gemella spp. Antiseptic treatment for 1 min led to no relevant CFU-reductions despite for CPC. When treated for 10 min, CPC was most effective followed by BAC, ALX, CHX, and DQC. Stable adaptations with up to fourfold MIC increases were found in E. coli toward all tested antiseptics, in E. faecalis toward CHX and BAC, and in S. aureus toward CPC. Adapted E. coli strains showed different protein expression as compared with the wildtype strain. CONCLUSION: Antiseptics showed limited antimicrobial efficacy toward mature biofilms when applied for clinically relevant treatment periods. Bacteria showed phenotypic adaptation upon repeated sub-inhibitory exposure. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinicians should be aware that wide-spread use of antiseptics may pose the risk of inducing resistances in oral bacteria.
OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to investigate the antimicrobial efficacy of antiseptics in saliva-derived microcosm biofilms, and to examine phenotypic adaption of bacteria upon repeated exposure to sub-inhibitory antiseptic concentrations. METHODS: Saliva-derived biofilms were formed mimicking caries- or gingivitis-associated conditions, respectively. Microbial compositions were analyzed by semiconductor-based 16S rRNA sequencing. Biofilms were treated with CHX, CPC, BAC, ALX, and DQC for 1 or 10 min, and colony forming units (CFU) were evaluated. Phenotypic adaptation of six selected bacterial reference strains toward CHX, CPC, and BAC was assessed by measuring minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) over 10 passages of sub-inhibitory exposure. Protein expression profiles were investigated by SDS-PAGE. RESULTS: Both biofilms showed outgrowth of streptococci and Veillonella spp., while gingivitis biofilms also showed increased relative abundances of Actinomyces, Granulicatella, and Gemella spp. Antiseptic treatment for 1 min led to no relevant CFU-reductions despite for CPC. When treated for 10 min, CPC was most effective followed by BAC, ALX, CHX, and DQC. Stable adaptations with up to fourfold MIC increases were found in E. coli toward all tested antiseptics, in E. faecalis toward CHX and BAC, and in S. aureus toward CPC. Adapted E. coli strains showed different protein expression as compared with the wildtype strain. CONCLUSION: Antiseptics showed limited antimicrobial efficacy toward mature biofilms when applied for clinically relevant treatment periods. Bacteria showed phenotypic adaptation upon repeated sub-inhibitory exposure. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinicians should be aware that wide-spread use of antiseptics may pose the risk of inducing resistances in oral bacteria.
Authors: Alex Solderer; Manuela Kaufmann; Deborah Hofer; Daniel Wiedemeier; Thomas Attin; Patrick R Schmidlin Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2018-12-07 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Xiaojun Mao; Andreas Hiergeist; David L Auer; Konstantin J Scholz; Denise Muehler; Karl-Anton Hiller; Tim Maisch; Wolfgang Buchalla; Elmar Hellwig; André Gessner; Ali Al-Ahmad; Fabian Cieplik Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2022-06-30 Impact factor: 6.064