| Literature DB >> 35625332 |
David L Auer1, Xiaojun Mao1, Annette Carola Anderson2, Denise Muehler1, Annette Wittmer3, Christiane von Ohle4, Diana Wolff5, Cornelia Frese5, Karl-Anton Hiller1, Tim Maisch6, Wolfgang Buchalla1, Elmar Hellwig2, Ali Al-Ahmad2, Fabian Cieplik1.
Abstract
Despite the wide-spread use of antiseptics in dental practice and oral care products, there is little public awareness of potential risks associated with antiseptic resistance and potentially concomitant cross-resistance. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate potential phenotypic adaptation in 177 clinical isolates of early colonizers of dental plaque (Streptococcus, Actinomyces, Rothia and Veillonella spp.) upon repeated exposure to subinhibitory concentrations of chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) or cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) over 10 passages using a modified microdilution method. Stability of phenotypic adaptation was re-evaluated after culture in antiseptic-free nutrient broth for 24 or 72 h. Strains showing 8-fold minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC)-increase were further examined regarding their biofilm formation capacity, phenotypic antibiotic resistance and presence of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs). Eight-fold MIC-increases to CHX were detected in four Streptococcus isolates. These strains mostly exhibited significantly increased biofilm formation capacity compared to their respective wild-type strains. Phenotypic antibiotic resistance was detected to tetracycline and erythromycin, consistent with the detected ARGs. In conclusion, this study shows that clinical isolates of early colonizers of dental plaque can phenotypically adapt toward antiseptics such as CHX upon repeated exposure. The underlying mechanisms at genomic and transcriptomic levels need to be investigated in future studies.Entities:
Keywords: adaptation; antibiotic; antiseptic; biocide; cetylpyridinium chloride; chlorhexidine; oral biofilm; resistance
Year: 2022 PMID: 35625332 PMCID: PMC9137571 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11050688
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) ISSN: 2079-6382
Clinical oral isolates included in this study.
| Taxon | Number of Isolates |
|---|---|
|
| 11 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 14 |
Results of MIC passaging in CHX or CPC summarized on a species-level.
| CHX | CPC | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strains | MIC | MIC | FC | Numbers of Isolates with | MIC | MIC | FC | Numbers of Isolates with | ||
| 4-Fold | 8-Fold | 4-Fold | 8-Fold | |||||||
| MIC Increase | MIC Increase | |||||||||
| 8 | 16 | 2 |
| 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| 8 | 16 | 2 |
| 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 0 | |
| 12 | 16 | 1 |
| 0 | 4 | 2 | 0.5 |
| 0 | |
| 4 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | 16 | 2 |
| 0 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | 6 | 3 |
|
| 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 |
| 2 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | 16 | 4 |
| 0 | 3 | 1 | 0.38 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | 16 | 3 |
| 0 | 4 | 2 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2 | 8 | 2 |
|
| 1 | 2 | 2 |
| 0 | |
| 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 |
| 2 | 4 | 2 |
| 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 |
| 1 | 4 | 2 |
| 0 | |
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 0 | 4 | 2 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0.75 | 2 | 3 |
| 0 | |
| 2 | 1.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1.5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
# MICs are shown on a species level as medians (1st and 3rd quartiles; for n ≥ 3), medians (minimum and maximum; for n = 2; marked by ˟) or single values (for n = 1). P1: passage 1; P10: passage 10; FC: fold-change.
Isolates exhibiting at least 8-fold MIC increase toward CHX between P1 and P10.
| Strain | MICCHX (µg/mL) | FC | FC | FC | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | P10 | R24 h | R72 h | |||||
|
| 59a | 0.5 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 0.5 |
| 59b | 0.5 | 0.5 | * | * | 1 | * | * | |
| 59c | 0.5 | 2 | * | * | 4 | * | * | |
| 59d | 0.5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 1 | |
| 59e | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 59f | 0.5 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 0.5 | |
|
| 73a | 1 | 8 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 1 |
| 73b | 1 | 2 | * | * | 2 | * | * | |
| 73c | 1 | 4 | * | * | 4 | * | * | |
| 73d | 1 | 4 | * | * | 4 | * | * | |
| 73e | 1 | 4 | * | * | 4 | * | * | |
| 73f | 1 | 4 | * | * | 4 | * | * | |
|
| 78a | 1 | 4 | * | * | 4 | * | * |
| 78b | 1 | 4 | * | * | 4 | * | * | |
| 78c | 2 | 4 | * | * | 2 | * | * | |
| 78d | 2 | 8 | * | * | 4 | * | * | |
| 78e | 1 | 8 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 1 | |
| 78f | 2 | 4 | * | * | 2 | * | * | |
|
| 93a | 1 | 4 | * | * | 4 | * | * |
| 93b | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 0.5 | |
| 93c | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 1 | |
| 93d | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 1 | |
| 93e | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 1 | |
| 93f | 1 | 4 | * | * | 4 | * | * | |
MICs of all replicates of the six isolates with at least 8-fold MIC-increase are shown at P1, P10, R24 h, and R72 h. Grey font depicts replicates not reaching an 8-fold MIC increase toward CHX from P1 to P10. P1: passage 1; P10: passage 10; R24 h: re-evaluation after culture in antiseptic-free nutrient broth for 24 h; R72 h: re-evaluation after culture in antiseptic-free nutrient broth for 72 h; FC: fold-change.
Figure 1Biofilm formation capacity of P10 replicates showing 8-fold MIC increase toward CHX and corresponding WT strains. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences from pairwise comparisons between P10 replicates and their respective WT strains. E. faecalis strain T9 was used as positive control for biofilm formation capacity [38].
Phenotypic antibiotic resistance of P10 replicates showing 8-fold MIC increase toward CHX and corresponding WT strains.
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 59 WT | 59a | 59d | 59f | 73 WT | 73a | 78 WT | 78e | 93 WT | 93b | 93c | 93d | 93e | ||
| β-lactams | PenG | 0.023 | 0.023 | 0.023 | 0.023 | 0.5 | 0.5–0.75 | 0.064 | 0.094 | 0.19 | 0.25 | 0.125 | 0.016–0.25 | 0.19 |
| AMP /AMX | 0.047 | 0.047 | 0.047 | 0.047 | 0.38–0.75 | 0.5–1.0 | 0.064 | 0.064 | 0.38 | 0.5–0.75 | 0.38 | 0.38–0.5 | 0.38 | |
| CXM | 0.032 | 0.032 | 0.047 | 0.032 | 0.125–0.19 | 0.19 | 0.047 | 0.032 | 0.5 | 0.75–1 | 0.5 | 0.032–0.5 | 0.5–0.75 | |
| MEM | 0.064 | 0.064 | 0.064 | 0.064 | 0.19 | 0.25–0.38 | 0.032 | 0.047 | 0.19–0.25 | 0.38 | 0.25–0.38 | 0.032–0.25 | 0.25–0.38 | |
| Tetracyclines | TET | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.19–0.25 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 12–24 | 16–24 | 12–24 | 12 | 12–24 |
| TGC | 0.064 | 0.064 | 0.064 | 0.064 | 0.047–0.064 | 0.047–0.064 | 0.032 | 0.047 | 0.047–0.064 | 0.047–0.064 | 0.016–0.064 | 0.016–0.047 | 0.032–0.047 | |
| Lincosamide | CLI | 0.064 | 0.064 | 0.064 | 0.064 | 0.047 | 0.047 | 0.032 | 0.047 | 0.094 | 0.094 | 0.047–0.094 | 0.094 | 0.094 |
| Macrolide | ERY | 0.047 | 0.047 | 0.047 | 0.047 | 8–12 | 4–6 | 6 | 3 | 6–8 | 8–24 | 8–24 | 2 | 12–24 |
| Fluoro-quinolone | MXF | 0.25 | 0.38 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.125–0.19 | 0.125–0.19 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.19–0.25 | 0.19 | 0.064–0.094 | 0.125–0.19 | 0.094–0.125 |
| Glycopeptide | VAN | 0.75 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.75 | 0.5 | 0.5–0.75 | 0.5 | 0.75 | 0.25 | 0.38 | 0.25–0.38 | 0.38 | 0.5–0.38 |
The first line shows the respective Etest result, while the second line gives the interpretation according to EUCAST 12.0 (S: susceptible; I: intermediate; R: resistant).
Antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) of P10 replicates showing 8-fold MIC increase toward CHX and corresponding WT strains as detected by PCR.
| ARG |
|
|
|
| Negative Control | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 59 WT | 59a | 59d | 59f | 73 WT | 73a | 78 WT | 78e | 93 WT | 93b | 93c | 93d | 93e | ||
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
|
|
|
| − |
| tetO | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| − | − |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| − | − | − | − |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| − |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
|
|
|
| − |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| − | − |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
|
|
|
| − |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
|
|
|
| − |
| positive control |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| − |
Corresponding primers are depicted in Supplementary Table S1. −: negative PCR result, +: positive PCR result.