Literature DB >> 33033804

Accelerating Prostate Diffusion-weighted MRI Using a Guided Denoising Convolutional Neural Network: Retrospective Feasibility Study.

Elena A Kaye1, Emily A Aherne1, Cihan Duzgol1, Ida Häggström1, Erich Kobler1, Yousef Mazaheri1, Maggie M Fung1, Zhigang Zhang1, Ricardo Otazo1, Hebert A Vargas1, Oguz Akin1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility of accelerating prostate diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) by reducing the number of acquired averages and denoising the resulting image using a proposed guided denoising convolutional neural network (DnCNN).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Raw data from the prostate DWI scans were retrospectively gathered between July 2018 and July 2019 from six single-vendor MRI scanners. There were 103 datasets used for training (median age, 64 years; interquartile range [IQR], 11), 15 for validation (median age, 68 years; IQR, 12), and 37 for testing (median age, 64 years; IQR, 12). High b-value diffusion-weighted (hb DW) data were reconstructed into noisy images using two averages and reference images using all 16 averages. A conventional DnCNN was modified into a guided DnCNN, which uses the low b-value DW image as a guidance input. Quantitative and qualitative reader evaluations were performed on the denoised hb DW images. A cumulative link mixed regression model was used to compare the readers' scores. The agreement between the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps (denoised vs reference) was analyzed using Bland-Altman analysis.
RESULTS: Compared with the original DnCNN, the guided DnCNN produced denoised hb DW images with higher peak signal-to-noise ratio (32.79 ± 3.64 [standard deviation] vs 33.74 ± 3.64), higher structural similarity index (0.92 ± 0.05 vs 0.93 ± 0.04), and lower normalized mean square error (3.9% ± 10 vs 1.6% ± 1.5) (P < .001 for all). Compared with the reference images, the denoised images received higher image quality scores from the readers (P < .0001). The ADC values based on the denoised hb DW images were in good agreement with the reference ADC values (mean ADC difference ranged from -0.04 to 0.02 × 10-3 mm2/sec).
CONCLUSION: Accelerating prostate DWI by reducing the number of acquired averages and denoising the resulting image using the proposed guided DnCNN is technically feasible. Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2020. 2020 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33033804      PMCID: PMC7529434          DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2020200007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell        ISSN: 2638-6100


  21 in total

1.  Repeatability of echo-planar-based diffusion measurements of the human prostate at 3 T.

Authors:  Peter Gibbs; Martin D Pickles; Lindsay W Turnbull
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Evaluating the effect of rectal distension on prostate multiparametric MRI image quality.

Authors:  Iztok Caglic; Nienke L Hansen; Rhys A Slough; Andrew J Patterson; Tristan Barrett
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Guided image filtering.

Authors:  Kaiming He; Jian Sun; Xiaoou Tang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.226

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  The Rician distribution of noisy MRI data.

Authors:  H Gudbjartsson; S Patz
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Measurement of signal intensities in the presence of noise in MR images.

Authors:  R M Henkelman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1985 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Image artifacts on prostate diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: trade-offs at 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Yousef Mazaheri; H Alberto Vargas; Gregory Nyman; Oguz Akin; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Improving Arterial Spin Labeling by Using Deep Learning.

Authors:  Ki Hwan Kim; Seung Hong Choi; Sung-Hong Park
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Zoomed echo-planar imaging using parallel transmission: impact on image quality of diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate at 3T.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Hersh Chandarana; Josef Pfeuffer; Michael J Triolo; Mohammed Bilal Shaikh; David J Mossa; Christian Geppert
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2015-01

10.  Repeatability of diffusion-weighted MRI of the prostate using whole lesion ADC values, skew and histogram analysis.

Authors:  Tristan Barrett; Edward M Lawrence; Andrew N Priest; Anne Y Warren; Vincent J Gnanapragasam; Ferdia A Gallagher; Evis Sala
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 3.528

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Deep learning in breast imaging.

Authors:  Arka Bhowmik; Sarah Eskreis-Winkler
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2022-05-13

2.  Artificial intelligence based image quality enhancement in liver MRI: a quantitative and qualitative evaluation.

Authors:  Marta Zerunian; Francesco Pucciarelli; Damiano Caruso; Michela Polici; Benedetta Masci; Gisella Guido; Domenico De Santis; Daniele Polverari; Daniele Principessa; Antonella Benvenga; Elsa Iannicelli; Andrea Laghi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 6.313

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.