PURPOSE: To assess impact of two-channel parallel transmission (pTx) with focused excitation [zoomed echo-planar imaging (EPI)] on image quality of prostate diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) at 3T. METHODS: 27 male volunteers (27 ± 8 years) underwent 3T prostate MRI using 2-channel radiofrequency-transmit system and 18-channel torso receive coil. Scans included EPI-DWI sequence (b values 50, 500, 1000 s/mm(2)) acquired both with standard sinc pulse and 2-channel pTX with focused excitation, each acquired at large-field-of-view (FOV) (20 × 20 cm) and small-FOV (14 × 14 cm). An abdominal radiologist scored b-1000 images and ADC maps for image quality measures. Sequences were compared using paired Wilcoxon tests. RESULTS: pTx with focused excitation showed significant improvements compared with standard DWI on b-1000 images at large-FOV for the absence of wrap and overall image quality (p ≤ 0.049); on b-1000 images at small-FOV for reduced distortion of prostate, absence of ghosting, absence of wrap, clarity of prostate capsule, clarity of peripheral/transition zone boundary, clarity of peri-urethral region, and overall image quality (p ≤ 0.004); and on ADC maps at small-FOV for reduced distortion of prostate, sharpness of prostate, clarity of prostatic capsule, clarity of peri-urethral region, and overall image quality (p = 0.002-0.036). When compared with standard large-FOV images, small-FOV images obtained using pTx with focused excitation showed no significant difference on the b-1000 images for any feature (p ≥ 0.175), while showing significant improvements on the ADC maps in terms of reduced distortion, absence of ghosting, and absence of wrap (p = 0.010-0.030). CONCLUSION: Zoomed DWI using 2-channel pTx reduced artifacts and improved image quality for 3T prostate DWI; benefit was most apparent for small-FOV images.
PURPOSE: To assess impact of two-channel parallel transmission (pTx) with focused excitation [zoomed echo-planar imaging (EPI)] on image quality of prostate diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) at 3T. METHODS: 27 male volunteers (27 ± 8 years) underwent 3T prostate MRI using 2-channel radiofrequency-transmit system and 18-channel torso receive coil. Scans included EPI-DWI sequence (b values 50, 500, 1000 s/mm(2)) acquired both with standard sinc pulse and 2-channel pTX with focused excitation, each acquired at large-field-of-view (FOV) (20 × 20 cm) and small-FOV (14 × 14 cm). An abdominal radiologist scored b-1000 images and ADC maps for image quality measures. Sequences were compared using paired Wilcoxon tests. RESULTS:pTx with focused excitation showed significant improvements compared with standard DWI on b-1000 images at large-FOV for the absence of wrap and overall image quality (p ≤ 0.049); on b-1000 images at small-FOV for reduced distortion of prostate, absence of ghosting, absence of wrap, clarity of prostate capsule, clarity of peripheral/transition zone boundary, clarity of peri-urethral region, and overall image quality (p ≤ 0.004); and on ADC maps at small-FOV for reduced distortion of prostate, sharpness of prostate, clarity of prostatic capsule, clarity of peri-urethral region, and overall image quality (p = 0.002-0.036). When compared with standard large-FOV images, small-FOV images obtained using pTx with focused excitation showed no significant difference on the b-1000 images for any feature (p ≥ 0.175), while showing significant improvements on the ADC maps in terms of reduced distortion, absence of ghosting, and absence of wrap (p = 0.010-0.030). CONCLUSION: Zoomed DWI using 2-channel pTx reduced artifacts and improved image quality for 3T prostate DWI; benefit was most apparent for small-FOV images.
Authors: G P Liney; L Holloway; T M Al Harthi; M Sidhom; D Moses; E Juresic; R Rai; D J Manton Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2015-03-05 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Elena A Kaye; Emily A Aherne; Cihan Duzgol; Ida Häggström; Erich Kobler; Yousef Mazaheri; Maggie M Fung; Zhigang Zhang; Ricardo Otazo; Hebert A Vargas; Oguz Akin Journal: Radiol Artif Intell Date: 2020-08-26
Authors: Rebecca A Rakow-Penner; Nathan S White; Daniel J A Margolis; John Kellogg Parsons; Natalie Schenker-Ahmed; Joshua M Kuperman; Hauke Bartsch; Hyung W Choi; William G Bradley; Ahmed Shabaik; Jiaoti Huang; Michael A Liss; Leonard Marks; Christopher J Kane; Robert E Reiter; Steven S Raman; David S Karow; Anders M Dale Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-07-26 Impact factor: 2.546