| Literature DB >> 33033383 |
Esmaeil S Nadimi1, Tomas Majtner2, Knud B Yderstraede3, Victoria Blanes-Vidal2.
Abstract
Rubeosis faciei diabeticorum, caused by microangiopathy and characterized by a chronic facial erythema, is associated with diabetic neuropathy. In clinical practice, facial erythema of patients with diabetes is evaluated based on subjective observations of visible redness, which often goes unnoticed leading to microangiopathic complications. To address this major shortcoming, we designed a contactless, non-invasive diagnostic point-of-care-device (POCD) consisting of a digital camera and a screen. Our solution relies on (1) recording videos of subject's face (2) applying Eulerian video magnification to videos to reveal important subtle color changes in subject's skin that fall outside human visual limits (3) obtaining spatio-temporal tensor expression profile of these variations (4) studying empirical spectral density (ESD) function of the largest eigenvalues of the tensors using random matrix theory (5) quantifying ESD functions by modeling the tails and decay rates using power law in systems exhibiting self-organized-criticality and (6) designing an optimal ensemble of learners to classify subjects into those with diabetic neuropathy and those of a control group. By analyzing a short video, we obtained a sensitivity of 100% in detecting subjects diagnosed with diabetic neuropathy. Our POCD paves the way towards the development of an inexpensive home-based solution for early detection of diabetic neuropathy and its associated complications.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33033383 PMCID: PMC7546636 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-73744-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Baseline characteristics of patients with diabetes.
| Type of diabetes | Neuropathy | Retinopathy | Gender | Age | Duration of diabetes (years) | Duration of microvascular complications (years) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Peripheral | Yes, non-proliferative | F | 50 | 31 | > 15 |
| F | 56 | 48 | > 15 | |||
| M | 49 | 18 | 4 | |||
| M | 58 | 28 | > 15 | |||
| M | 65 | 16 | 12 | |||
| M | 70 | 32 | 8 | |||
| M | 73 | 15 | > 15 | |||
| Yes, proliferative | M | 72 | 36 | > 15 | ||
| M | 65 | 51 | > 15 | |||
| Autonomic | M | 30 | 21 | 11 | ||
| 2 | Peripheral | No | F | 72 | 24 | 2 |
| Yes, non-proliferative | F | 70 | 30 | >15 | ||
| M | 64 | 23 | 9 | |||
| M | 67 | 20 | 12 | |||
| M | 71 | 22 | > 15 | |||
| Yes, proliferative | F | 60 | 26 | > 15 | ||
| F | 63 | 11 | 11 | |||
| M | 67 | 19 | > 15 |
Figure 1Experimental set-up.
Figure 2Schematic of our proposed method.
Cross-validated optimal weighted ensemble (COWE) algorithm.
Figure 3Architecture of our cross-validated optimal weighted ensemble (COWE)-based classifier.
Figure 4Illustration of temporal facial color variations before (top row) and after applying Eulerian Video Magnification (bottom row).
Figure 5Example of the difference between the highest and lowest intensity value of the Red channel (RGB color spectrum) of a -pixel patch. The left patch belongs to a subject from group DM and the right patch is generated from a subject of group C.
Figure 6Example of empirical spectral density function of the largest eigenvalues of spatio-temporal tensor expression profile of color variations (left: subject from group C in log-log scale; right: subject from group DM).
Fitted generalized pareto and power law exponent (SOC) to the data of subjects belonging to group C.
| C | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (0.0869,0.0001) | (0.1013,0.0001) | (0.1697,0.0001) | (0.5628,0.0030) | (0.4382,0.0033) | (1.0249,0.0020) | (1.1599,0.0004) | (0.0897,0.0031) | (0.4650,0.0016) | |
| N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
is the jth video segment of subject i.
Fitted Generalized Pareto and Gamma distribution to the data of subjects belonging to group DM.
| DM | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | |
| (5.449,0.022) | (4.935,0.021) | (4.344,0.023) | (4.948,0.006) | (2.283,0.008) | (1.783,0.015) | (3.310,0.183) | (5.450,0.146) | (3.615,0.133) | |
| N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
is the jth video segment of subject i.
Figure 7Fitted Gamma probability and cumulative density functions to the tails of the empirical spectral density function of the largest eigenvalue of subjects of group DM.
Figure 8Observed minimum classification error of the best performing ensemble of learners.
Figure 9Scatter plot of the ensemble of model predictions.
Figure 10Example of one out of ten decision trees.
Figure 11ROC curve (left) and scaled trained weights of our ensemble of learners (right).
Figure 12Classification results based on the majority voting of video segments, each column representing the number of aggregated video segments.