| Literature DB >> 33031477 |
Hui Guo1, Wei Li2, Yingying Huang1, Xiaoyan Li1, Zhi Li1, Hongxia Zhou2, Enhua Sun2, Li Li3, Jisheng Li3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the microbial loading in aerosols produced after air-puff by non-contact tonometer (NCT) as well as the effect of alcohol disinfection on the inhibition of microbes and thus to provide suggestions for the prevention and control of COVID-19 in ophthalmic departments of hospitals or clinics during the great pandemics.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33031477 PMCID: PMC7544126 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240421
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Increased microbial colonies were detected in air samples beside the nozzle after NCT air-puff.
A: Representatives of culture plates at different sampling sites after NCT air-puff. a,b,c: room air samples after UV disinfection; d,e,f: air samples beside the nozzle after different times of air-puff; g,h,i: air samples at 1-m distance from the nozzle after different times of air-puff. B: More microbial colonies were detected in air samples beside the nozzle compared with samples at 1-m distance (overall difference p<0.05). For the difference between groups, a significant difference was observed in the group of 30 times air-puff (p<0.05). There were no significant differences between the other three groups.
Microbial strains identified by mass spectrometry in room air samples after UV light disinfection and air samples collected beside the nozzle and at 1-m distance from the nozzle after NCT air-puff.
| Site | Times of air-puff | Microbial Strains |
|---|---|---|
| Room air after ultraviolet light disinfection | N/A | Micrococcus sp, Moraxella osloensis |
| Air samples beside the nozzle | 6 | Micrococcus luteus |
| 30 | Micrococcus luteus, Escherichia coli, Kytococcus schroeteri, Pseudarthrobacter oxydans, Bacillus feed | |
| 60 | Pseudarthrobacter oxydans, Corynebacterium afermentans, Corynebacterium lipophiloflavum | |
| 90 | Staphylococcus xylosus Staphylococcus epidermidis | |
| Air samples at 1-m distance from the nozzle | 6 | Staphylococcus epidermidis |
| 30 | Micrococcus luteus, Bacillus littoral, Staphylococcus epidermidis | |
| 60 | Agrococcus jenensis, Shewanell baltica, Staphylococcus epidermidis | |
| 90 | Clostridium bharat |
Fig 2Less microbial colonies were detected in air samples beside the nozzle after 75% alcohol disinfection.
A: Representatives of culture plates of air samples beside the nozzle after NCT air-puff before and after 75% alcohol disinfection. a,b,c: air samples besides nozzle after different times of air-puff; d.e.f: air samples besides nozzle after different times of air-puff with alcohol disinfection. B: Less microbial colonies were detected in air samples besides nozzle after alcohol disinfection (overall difference p<0.05). For the difference between groups, a significant difference was observed in both groups of 30- and 60- times air-puff (p<0.05). There were no significant differences between the other two groups.
Microbial strains identified by mass spectrometry in air samples collected beside the nozzle after different times of air-puff with or without alcohol disinfection.
| Site | Times of air-puff | Microbial Strains |
|---|---|---|
| Air beside nozzle | 6 | Staphylococcus xylosus |
| 30 | Escherichia coli, Kytococcus schroeteri, Staphylococcus warneri, Bacillus cereus | |
| 60 | Paenarthrobacter ureafaciens, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus simplex, Staphylococcus hominis | |
| 90 | Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus haemolyticus | |
| air around jet after alcohol disinfection | 6 | none |
| 30 | Staphylococcus warneri, Micrococcus luteas | |
| 60 | Staphylococcus hominis | |
| 90 | Staphylococcus haemolyticus |