| Literature DB >> 33029157 |
Kenneth Wiru1, Felix Boakye Oppong1, Oscar Agyei1, Charles Zandoh1, Obed Ernest Nettey1, Robert Adda1, Antonio Gasparrini2, Kwaku Poku Asante1.
Abstract
Globally, studies have shown that diurnal changes in weather conditions and extreme weather events have a profound effect on mortality. Here, we assessed the effect of apparent temperature on all-cause mortality and the modifying effect of sex on the apparent temperature-mortality relationship using mortality and weather data archived over an eleven-year period. An overdispersed Poisson regression and distributed lag nonlinear models were used for this analysis. With these models, we analysed the relative risk of mortality at different temperature values over a 10-day lag period. By and large, we observed a nonlinear association between mean daily apparent temperature and all-cause mortality. An assessment of different temperature values over a 10-day lag period showed an increased risk of death at the lowest apparent temperature (18°C) from lag 2 to 4 with the highest relative risk of mortality (RR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.2, 2.15, p value = 0.001) occurring three days after exposure. The relative risk of death also varied between males (RR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.10, 0.94) and females (RR = 4.88, 95% CI: 1.40, 16.99) by apparent temperature and lag. On the whole, males are sensitive to both temperature extremes whilst females are more vulnerable to low temperature-related mortality. Accordingly, our findings could inform efforts at reducing temperature-related mortality in this context and other settings with similar environmental and demographic characteristics.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33029157 PMCID: PMC7527893 DOI: 10.1155/2020/5980313
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Environ Public Health ISSN: 1687-9805
Figure 1Map of Ghana highlighting the Kintampo Health and Demographic Surveillance area.
Summary statistics of daily mortality in the Kintampo HDSS area from 2005 to 2015.
| Classification | Total mortality | Daily mean (SD) | Min-max | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All-cause mortality | 10,865 | 2.7 (1.3) | 1–11 | 100 |
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 6,146 | 1.5 (1.1) | 0–10 | 56.6 |
| Female | 4,719 | 1.2 (1.0) | 0–6 | 43.4 |
|
| ||||
| 0–4 years | 2,598 | 0.6 (0.8) | 0–5 | 23.9 |
| 5–19 years | 3,877 | 0.2 (0.5) | 0–4 | 35.7 |
| 20–59 years | 972 | 1.0 (0.9) | 0–7 | 8.9 |
| 60+ | 3,418 | 0.9 (0.9) | 0–6 | 31.5 |
Figure 2Time series of daily mortality, mean temperature, and humidity in the Kintampo HDSS area from 2005 to 2015.
Summary statistics of daily temperature and humidity in the Kintampo HDSS area from 2005 to 2015.
| Variable | Mean (standard deviation) | Range | Interquartile range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum temperature (°C) | 23.4 (2.1) | 14.0–32.0 | 22.0–24.6 |
| Maximum temperature (°C) | 31.0 (2.6) | 22.0–39.0 | 29.0–33.0 |
| Average temperature (°C) ǂ | 27.2 (1.8) | 20.0–34.0 | 26.0–28.5 |
| AM relative humidity (%) | 87.9 (14.6) | 7.0–100.0 | 83.0–98.0 |
| PM relative humidity (%) | 65.9 (17.1) | 6.0–100.0 | 55.0–76.0 |
| Average relative humidity (%) ð | 76.9 (14.5) | 7.0–99.5 | 70.0–86.5 |
| Apparent temperature (°C) | 24.8 (1.6) | 17.9–30.6 | 23.7–25.9 |
ǂ: average of minimum and maximum daily temperature; ð: average of maximum (AM) and minimum (PM) relative humidity.
Figure 3Overall effect of apparent temperature on mortality in the Kintampo HDSS area from 2005 to 2015.
Figure 4Relative risk of mortality by lag at specific apparent temperatures in the Kintampo HDSS area from 2005 to 2015.
Figure 5Relative risk of mortality by apparent temperature at specific lags in the Kintampo HDSS area from 2005 to 2015.
Relative risk of mortality at different apparent temperatures stratified by sex at different lag periods.
| Classification | Lowest at (18°C) RR (95% CI) | First quartile at (23°C) RR (95% CI) | Third quartile at (26°C) RR (95% CI) | Highest at (31°C) RR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All deaths | ||||
| Lag 0 1 | 0.50 (0.24, 1.01) | 1.03 (0.98, 1.09) | 1.03 (0.99, 1.07) | 0.94 (0.60, 1.47) |
| Lag 2–4 | 3.16 (1.58, 6.33) | 0.93 (0.87, 0.99) | 0.98 (0.93, 1.02) | 1.71 (1.03, 2.83) |
| Lag 5–10 | 1.08 (0.36, 3.24) | 1.01 (0.93, 1.10) | 1.01 (0.95, 1.07) | 0.87 (0.43, 1.79) |
|
| ||||
| Male | ||||
| Lag 0-1 | 0.31 (0.10, 0.94) | 1.03 (0.94, 1.12) | 1.05 (0.99, 1.12) | 1.28 (0.66, 2.46) |
| Lag 2–4 | 2.21 (0.76, 6.44) | 0.93 (0.85, 1.02) | 0.97 (0.91, 1.04) | 2.19 (1.03, 4.65) |
| Lag 5–10 | 1.14 (0.22, 5.80) | 0.99 (0.87, 1.12) | 1.00 (0.91, 1.09) | 1.55 (0.54, 4.50) |
|
| ||||
| Female | ||||
| Lag 0-1 | 0.85 (0.25, 2.94) | 1.04 (0.94, 1.15) | 1.00 (0.93, 1.08) | 0.61 (0.26, 1.42) |
| Lag 2–4 | 4.88 (1.40, 16.99) | 0.93 (0.83, 1.04) | 0.98 (0.90, 1.07) | 1.23 (0.48, 3.15) |
| Lag 5–10 | 0.79 (0.10, 6.30) | 1.05 (0.90, 1.23) | 1.04 (0.93, 1.16) | 0.39 (0.10, 1.50) |
AT: apparent temperature; RR: relative risk; °C: degree Celsius; CI: confidence interval.