| Literature DB >> 26781954 |
Tran Ngoc Dang1,2, Xerxes T Seposo1, Nguyen Huu Chau Duc3,4, Tran Binh Thang5, Do Dang An6, Lai Thi Minh Hang7, Tran Thanh Long7, Bui Thi Hong Loan8, Yasushi Honda9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The relationship between temperature and mortality has been found to be U-, V-, or J-shaped in developed temperate countries; however, in developing tropical/subtropical cities, it remains unclear.Entities:
Keywords: cold effects; high temperature effects; hot effects; low temperature effects; time-series regression
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26781954 PMCID: PMC4716554 DOI: 10.3402/gha.v9.28738
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Glob Health Action ISSN: 1654-9880 Impact factor: 2.640
Summary statistics of daily weather conditions and daily mortality in Hue, Viet Nam, 2009–2013
| Percentile | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | Mean | SD | Minimum | 25% | 50% | 75% | Maximum |
| Maximum temperature (°C) | 29.9 | 5.5 | 15 | 26.2 | 31 | 34.2 | 42 |
| Average temperature (°C) | 25.7 | 4.1 | 14.4 | 23 | 26.3 | 28.9 | 33.9 |
| Minimum temperature (°C) | 21.7 | 3.1 | 12.7 | 19.8 | 22.8 | 24.2 | 27.5 |
| Average dew point temperature (°C) | 22.1 | 2.7 | 12.5 | 20.6 | 22.9 | 24.1 | 28.5 |
| Average relative humidity (%) | 81.9 | 12.7 | 21.9 | 75.8 | 85 | 91.1 | 100 |
| All-cause mortality | 3.4 | 2.2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 12 |
| Cause-specific mortality | |||||||
| External cause | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Non-external cause | 3.2 | 2.1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 12 |
| Cardiovascular | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| Respiratory | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Cancer | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Sex-specific mortality | |||||||
| Male | 1.8 | 1.5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10 |
| Female | 1.6 | 1.4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 |
| Age-specific mortality | |||||||
| 0–14 years old | 0.1 | 0.25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 15–64 years old | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| ≥65 years old | 2.2 | 1.7 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 12 |
Mortality is given in number of deaths per day.
Fig. 1Histograms, scatter plots, and correlation coefficients between weather conditions and mortality in Hue, Viet Nam, 2009–2013.
Fig. 2Cumulative overall temperature effects on all-cause mortality at different lag periods. The final natural cubic spline–natural cubic spline (NCS–NCS) model defined by distributed lag non-linear model cross-basis functions with 4 degrees of freedom (df) for the temperature dimension and 5 df for the lag dimension. The reference was at the median of temperature. Red lines are the cumulative relative risks, and grey regions are 95% confidence intervals.
Fig. 3Cumulative overall temperature effects on age- and sex-specific mortality. Red lines are the cumulative relative risks, and grey regions are 95% confidence intervals.
Fig. 4Cumulative overall temperature effects on cause-specific mortality. Red lines are the cumulative relative risks, and grey regions are 95% confidence intervals.
Fig. 5The lag structures of high and low temperature effects on all-cause and cause-specific mortality. The high temperature effect (left) is the effect of the 99th temperature percentile (32.4°C) relative to the 50th temperature percentile (26.3°C). The low temperature effect is the effect of the 1st temperature percentile (15.8°C) relative to the 50th temperature percentile (26.3°C). Red lines are the relative risks at single lag, and grey regions are 95% confidence intervals.
The cumulative effects of high and low temperatures on cause-, age-, and sex-specific mortality
| Statistic | High temperature effect | Low temperature effect |
|---|---|---|
| All-cause mortality | 1.28 (1.04–1.58) | 1.78 (1.10–2.88) |
| Cause-specific mortality | ||
| Non-external | 1.32 (1.07–1.63) | 1.88 (1.15–3.07) |
| Cardiovascular | 1.6 (1.15–2.22) | 1.99 (0.92–4.28) |
| Respiratory | 2.45 (0.91–6.63) | 0.47 (0.03–8.19) |
| Cancer | 1.08 (0.69–1.68) | 1.71 (0.58–5.05) |
| Sex-specific mortality | ||
| Male | 1.28 (0.99–1.67) | 1.42 (0.77–2.63) |
| Female | 1.27 (0.95–1.7) | 2.19 (1.14–4.21) |
| Age-specific mortality | ||
| 0–64 years old | 1.05 (0.76–1.46) | 1.43 (0.65–3.14) |
| ≥65 years old | 1.42 (1.11–1.83) | 2.0 (1.13–3.52) |
High temperature effect is the cumulative relative risk comparing the 99th temperature percentile (32.4°C) to the 50th temperature percentile (26.3°C) at lag 0–2.
Low temperature effect is the cumulative relative risk comparing the 1st temperature percentile (15.8°C) to the 50th temperature percentile (26.3°C) at lag 0–28.
Significant at p<0.05.