Shengzhi Sun1, Kate R Weinberger2, Keith R Spangler3, Melissa N Eliot2, Joseph M Braun2, Gregory A Wellenius2. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI 02912, USA. Electronic address: Shengzhi_Sun@Brown.edu. 2. Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI 02912, USA. 3. Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI 02912, USA; Department of Earth, Environmental and Planetary Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Days of extreme temperature may be associated with transiently higher risk of preterm birth, but prior studies have been limited and results have been heterogeneous. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between days of extreme heat and cold and risk of preterm birth among ~32 million live singleton births between 1989 and 2002 across 403 counties in the contiguous United States (US). METHODS: We used a distributed lag nonlinear model to estimate the association between population-weighted daily mean temperature and risk of preterm birth in each county and then pooled results across geographic regions and climate zones. We defined extreme heat and cold as the 95th and 5th percentile of the county-specific temperatures, respectively. RESULTS: Preterm birth accounted for 9.3% of deliveries. There was a monotonic association between ambient temperature and risk of preterm birth. Days of extreme heat and cold were associated with a relative risk of preterm birth of 1.025 (95% CI: 1.015, 1.036) and 0.985 (95% CI: 0.976, 0.993) over the subsequent four days, respectively, relative to the county-specific median temperature. If causal, the fraction of preterm births attributable to extreme heat was 0.17% (empirical 95% CI: 0.14%, 0.19%), corresponding to 154 (empirical 95% CI: 127, 173) preterm births per million births. Extreme heat was more strongly associated with preterm birth in regions with colder and drier climates, and among younger women. Days of extreme cold temperature were associated with lower rather than higher risk of preterm birth. CONCLUSIONS: Days of extreme heat, but not extreme cold, are associated with higher risk of preterm birth in the contiguous US. If causal, these results may have important implications for the management of pregnant women during forecasted periods of extreme heat.
BACKGROUND: Days of extreme temperature may be associated with transiently higher risk of preterm birth, but prior studies have been limited and results have been heterogeneous. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between days of extreme heat and cold and risk of preterm birth among ~32 million live singleton births between 1989 and 2002 across 403 counties in the contiguous United States (US). METHODS: We used a distributed lag nonlinear model to estimate the association between population-weighted daily mean temperature and risk of preterm birth in each county and then pooled results across geographic regions and climate zones. We defined extreme heat and cold as the 95th and 5th percentile of the county-specific temperatures, respectively. RESULTS: Preterm birth accounted for 9.3% of deliveries. There was a monotonic association between ambient temperature and risk of preterm birth. Days of extreme heat and cold were associated with a relative risk of preterm birth of 1.025 (95% CI: 1.015, 1.036) and 0.985 (95% CI: 0.976, 0.993) over the subsequent four days, respectively, relative to the county-specific median temperature. If causal, the fraction of preterm births attributable to extreme heat was 0.17% (empirical 95% CI: 0.14%, 0.19%), corresponding to 154 (empirical 95% CI: 127, 173) preterm births per million births. Extreme heat was more strongly associated with preterm birth in regions with colder and drier climates, and among younger women. Days of extreme cold temperature were associated with lower rather than higher risk of preterm birth. CONCLUSIONS: Days of extreme heat, but not extreme cold, are associated with higher risk of preterm birth in the contiguous US. If causal, these results may have important implications for the management of pregnant women during forecasted periods of extreme heat.
Authors: Gregory A Wellenius; Melissa N Eliot; Kathleen F Bush; Dennis Holt; Rebecca A Lincoln; Andy E Smith; Julia Gold Journal: Environ Res Date: 2017-05-09 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Hannah Blencowe; Simon Cousens; Mikkel Z Oestergaard; Doris Chou; Ann-Beth Moller; Rajesh Narwal; Alma Adler; Claudia Vera Garcia; Sarah Rohde; Lale Say; Joy E Lawn Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-06-09 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Yi Sun; Sindana D Ilango; Lara Schwarz; Qiong Wang; Jiu-Chiuan Chen; Jean M Lawrence; Jun Wu; Tarik Benmarhnia Journal: Environ Res Lett Date: 2020-10-09 Impact factor: 6.793
Authors: Shengzhi Sun; Keith R Spangler; Kate R Weinberger; Jeff D Yanosky; Joseph M Braun; Gregory A Wellenius Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2019-06-04 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Carina J Gronlund; Alyssa J Yang; Kathryn C Conlon; Rachel S Bergmans; Hien Q Le; Stuart A Batterman; Robert L Wahl; Lorraine Cameron; Marie S O'Neill Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-02-05 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Juan Liang; Dezhi Mu; Tao Xiong; Peiran Chen; Yi Mu; Xiaohong Li; Baofeng Di; Jierui Li; Yi Qu; Jun Tang Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2020-06-10 Impact factor: 14.919