Literature DB >> 31492521

Controversies in ART: can the IVF laboratory influence preimplantation embryo aneuploidy?

Jason E Swain1.   

Abstract

Published reports have indicated that rates of preimplantation embryo aneuploidy in a control donor population may vary between IVF centres. This suggests that location-specific conditions, in the clinic, IVF or genetics laboratory, may be influencing the chromosome dynamics or diagnosis. More recent reports suggest that rates of embryo mosaicism, representing mitotic errors, may vary between IVF centres. This would suggest perhaps a laboratory-controlled variable is influencing mitotic cell division during preimplantation embryo development. Various IVF laboratory-controlled factors may be impacting chromosome separation and segregation. Variables including type of culture media, pH, temperature, osmolality and oxygen concentration could all be possible factors influencing embryo aneuploidy. Furthermore, laboratory techniques, method of insemination, laser use or handling of biopsied cells may also influence genetic results. These IVF laboratory variables will be reviewed and literature suggesting a possible link to mitotic aneuploidy/mosaicism discussed.
Copyright © 2019 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blastocyst; Culture conditions; Culture media; Embryo; Mosaicism; pH

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31492521     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  12 in total

1.  All Models Are Wrong, but Some Are Useful.

Authors:  Carol Lynn Curchoe
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Different CO2 settings (6.0% vs 7.0%) do have an impact on extracellular pH of culture medium (pHe) and euploidy rates rather than on blastocyst development: a sibling oocyte study.

Authors:  Andrea Abdala; Ibrahim Elkhatib; Aşina Bayram; Ana Arnanz; Ahmed El-Damen; Laura Melado; Barbara Lawrenz; Nicolás Garrido; Human M Fatemi; Neelke De Munck
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  The effect of trophectoderm biopsy technique and sample handling on artefactual mosaicism.

Authors:  Lluc Coll; Mònica Parriego; Beatriz Carrasco; Ignacio Rodríguez; Montserrat Boada; Buenaventura Coroleu; Nikolaos P Polyzos; Francesca Vidal; Anna Veiga
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.357

4.  Non-invasive imaging of mouse embryo metabolism in response to induced hypoxia.

Authors:  Emily A Seidler; T Sanchez; M Venturas; D Sakkas; D J Needleman
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Euploidy rates are not affected when embryos are cultured in a continuous (CCM) or sequential culture medium (SCM): a sibling oocyte study.

Authors:  Andrea Abdala; Ibrahim Elkhatib; Aşina Bayram; Ana Arnanz; Ahmed El-Damen; Laura Melado; Barbara Lawrenz; Carol Coughlan; Nicolas Garrido; Human M Fatemi; Neelke De Munck
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 3.357

Review 6.  Preimplantation chromosomal mosaics, chimaeras and confined placental mosaicism.

Authors:  John D West; Clare A Everett
Journal:  Reprod Fertil       Date:  2022-04-05

7.  Characteristics of the IVF Cycle that Contribute to the Incidence of Mosaicism.

Authors:  Lorena Rodrigo; Mónica Clemente-Císcar; Inmaculada Campos-Galindo; Vanessa Peinado; Carlos Simón; Carmen Rubio
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 8.  Oxidative Stress and Assisted Reproduction: A Comprehensive Review of Its Pathophysiological Role and Strategies for Optimizing Embryo Culture Environment.

Authors:  Ashok Agarwal; Israel Maldonado Rosas; Christina Anagnostopoulou; Rossella Cannarella; Florence Boitrelle; Lina Villar Munoz; Renata Finelli; Damayanthi Durairajanayagam; Ralf Henkel; Ramadan Saleh
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-28

9.  Comparison of aneuploidy rates between conventional in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection split insemination cycles.

Authors:  Jie Deng; Olutunmike Kuyoro; Qianying Zhao; Barry Behr; Ruth B Lathi
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2020-07-27

10.  Consistency in rates of diagnosis of embryonic mosaicism, segmental abnormalities, and "no call" results among experienced embryologists performing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.

Authors:  Emily K Osman; Shelby A Neal; Ashley W Tiegs; Brent M Hanson; Julia G Kim; Jason M Franasiak; Richard T Scott
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2020-09-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.