Literature DB >> 3676234

Effect of previous nutrition on body composition and maintenance energy costs of growing lambs.

C L Ferrell1, L J Koong, J A Nienaber.   

Abstract

1. Forty-eight intact male lambs (30 kg) were fed to gain 16 (H), 5 (M) or -6 (L) kg during a 42 d interval (period 1). Lambs from each of the H and M groups were fed to gain either 16 (HH, MH), 5 (HM, MM) or -6 (HL, ML) kg and lambs from the L group were fed to gain 27 (LS), 16 (LH) or 5 (LM) kg during the ensuing 42 d (period 2). 2. Fasting heat production (FHP) of four lambs from each treatment was determined at the end of period 2. 3. Weights and compositions of the carcass, offal and digesta-free body as well as weights of major internal organs were determined for four lambs of each treatment at the end of periods 1 and 2. 4. Within groups of lambs of similar weight at the end of period 2, body composition was, in general, similar, but FHP was greater in lambs that had been on higher planes of nutrition during period 2. 5. Within groups of lambs of similar weight, lambs that were fed at higher planes of nutrition during period 2 had greater weights or proportions of liver, small intestine, large intestine and stomach. 6. Neither weight of the liver, kidney, stomach, small intestine, large intestine nor daily fasting heat production were constant functions of body-weight. Relations of these traits to body-weight changed with rate of gain. 7. Regression analysis indicated that the feeding of lambs at higher planes of nutrition during period 1 resulted in higher maintenance requirements of those lambs during period 2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3676234     DOI: 10.1079/bjn19860140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  6 in total

1.  Progressive limit feeding to maximize profit in the feedlot1.

Authors:  Bruce M Hannon; Michael R Murphy
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Effects of feeding level on efficiency of high- and low-residual feed intake beef steers.

Authors:  Emily M Andreini; Sheyenne M Augenstein; Carrie S Fales; Roberto D Sainz; James W Oltjen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Beef cows housed in mud during late gestation have greater net energy requirements compared with cows housed on wood chip bedding.

Authors:  Kirsten R Nickles; Alejandro E Relling; Alvaro Garcia-Guerra; Francis L Fluharty; Justin Kieffer; Anthony J Parker
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-04-15

4.  Energetic efficiency and the first law: the California net energy system revisited.

Authors:  Carl A Old; Heidi A Rossow; Ian J Lean; Thomas R Famula
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  A mathematical nutrition model adequately predicts beef and dairy cow intake and biological efficiency.

Authors:  Phillip A Lancaster; Michael E Davis; Luis O Tedeschi; Jack J Rutledge; Larry V Cundiff
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2021-12-20

6.  Effects of dietary energy density and supplemental rumen undegradable protein on intake, viscera, and carcass composition of lambs recovering from nutritional restriction.

Authors:  Holland C Dougherty; Mark Evered; James W Oltjen; Roger S Hegarty; Stephen A Neutze; V Hutton Oddy
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.338

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.