Literature DB >> 33025467

General and own-species attentional face biases.

Krisztina V Jakobsen1, Cassidy White2, Elizabeth A Simpson3.   

Abstract

Humans demonstrate enhanced processing of human faces compared with animal faces, known as own-species bias. This bias is important for identifying people who may cause harm, as well as for recognizing friends and kin. However, growing evidence also indicates a more general face bias. Faces have high evolutionary importance beyond conspecific interactions, as they aid in detecting predators and prey. Few studies have explored the interaction of these biases together. In three experiments, we explored processing of human and animal faces, compared with each other and to nonface objects, which allowed us to examine both own-species and broader face biases. We used a dot-probe paradigm to examine human adults' covert attentional biases for task-irrelevant human faces, animal faces, and objects. We replicated the own-species attentional bias for human faces relative to animal faces. We also found an attentional bias for animal faces relative to objects, consistent with the proposal that faces broadly receive privileged processing. Our findings suggest that humans may be attracted to a broad class of faces. Further, we found that while participants rapidly attended to human faces across all cue display durations, they attended to animal faces only when they had sufficient time to process them. Our findings reveal that the dot-probe paradigm is sensitive for capturing both own-species and more general face biases, and that each has a different attentional signature, possibly reflecting their unique but overlapping evolutionary importance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dot-probe paradigm; Face perception; General face template; Visual attention

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33025467     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02132-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  40 in total

1.  Covert attention accelerates the rate of visual information processing.

Authors:  M Carrasco; B McElree
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Fast saccades toward faces: face detection in just 100 ms.

Authors:  Sébastien M Crouzet; Holle Kirchner; Simon J Thorpe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Attentional bias to angry faces using the dot-probe task? It depends when you look for it.

Authors:  Robbie M Cooper; Stephen R H Langton
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2006-09

4.  Face processing limitation to own species in primates: a comparative study in brown capuchins, Tonkean macaques and humans.

Authors:  Valerie Dufour; Olivier Pascalis; Odile Petit
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  The control of attention to faces.

Authors:  Markus Bindemann; A Mike Burton; Stephen R H Langton; Stefan R Schweinberger; Martin J Doherty
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Domain specificity versus expertise: factors influencing distinct processing of faces.

Authors:  David Carmel; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-02

Review 7.  What does the facial dot-probe task tell us about attentional processes in social anxiety? A systematic review.

Authors:  Trisha Bantin; Stephan Stevens; Alexander L Gerlach; Christiane Hermann
Journal:  J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry       Date:  2015-05-12

8.  Animate Objects are Detected More Frequently than Inanimate Objects in Inattentional Blindness Tasks Independently of Threat.

Authors:  Dustin P Calvillo; Whitney C Hawkins
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  2016

9.  Are faces of different species perceived categorically by human observers?

Authors:  R Campbell; O Pascalis; M Coleman; S B Wallace; P J Benson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Non-threatening other-race faces capture visual attention: evidence from a dot-probe task.

Authors:  Shahd Al-Janabi; Colin MacLeod; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.