Utility of procalcitonin in a medical intensive care unit in Croatia.

AIMS: To investigate the clinical benefit of routine procalcitonin (PCT) measurement in the medical intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary referral hospital.
METHODS: Adult patients with suspected infections were included. White blood cells, C‑reactive protein (CRP), and PCT were measured.
RESULTS: In this study 129 patients of median age 64 years (interquartile range 39-89 years) were prospectively included. The Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores were 21 ± 14 and 7 ± 6, respectively. Intensive care unit (ICU) mortality was 22.5%. Immunocompromised patients constituted 39.5%. A significant correlation was observed between PCT and APACHE II (Spearman's rho 0.461, p < 0.01), PCT and SOFA (Spearman's rho 0.494, p < 0.01) and PCT and CRP (Spearman's rho 0.403, p < 0.01). Most patients (n = 83, 64.3%) received antibiotics before admission. No difference in PCT (1.56 ± 8 µg/L vs. 1.44 ± 13 µg/L, p = 0.6) was observed with respect to previous antibiotic therapy. Levels of PCT and CRP were significantly increased in patients with positive blood cultures, the infection caused by Gram-negative microorganism regardless of disease severity and pneumonia with complications. PCT did not differ among patients with positive vs negative urine culture (4.6 ± 16 µg/L vs. 1.76 ± 11.9 µg/L) or positive vs. negative endotracheal aspirate (1.93 ± 11.4 µg/L vs. 1.76 ± 1.11 µg/L). PCT-guided stewardship was applied in 36 patients (28%).
CONCLUSION: Increased initial PCT levels might point to the development of more severe disease caused by Gram-negative bacteria, regardless of previous antibiotic treatment. The results pertain to immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients. Implementation of PCT-guided stewardship in those patients is possible and relies on experience as well as knowledge of reference change value for a marker within the specific setting.

Introduction

Sepsis is a medical emergency and rapid initiation of antimicrobial therapy is of utmost importance [1]; however, up to 30–50% of prescribed antibiotics may be unnecessary [2]. Antibiotic overprescription can lead to the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains, unnecessary drug adverse events, antibiotic-related colitis, etc. Therefore, antibiotic stewardship and resistance problems are very important in the critical care setting. Biomarkers might provide additional rationale to initiate, withhold, or stop the antibiotic administration. Procalcitonin is probably the most widely studied rapidly available biomarker with the potential to guide antibiotic prescription in patients with infections. In the critical care setting, published studies differ greatly considering patient case mix [3-7], the source of infection [3, 4, 6–13], the severity of the disease [4, 5, 10–12, 14], exclusion criteria as well as cut-offs and laboratory methods for PCT measurements [3, 11, 13–15]. Studies so far have shown that PCT -guided antimicrobial stewardship regarding discontinuation of antimicrobial therapy is safe, primarily by demonstrating that patients who received antibiotic therapy guided by PCT levels had similar mortality to patients who were receiving antibiotic therapy according to standard guidelines [16-18]. Moreover, PCT-guided therapy showed a clear trend toward the reduction of antibiotic consumption [3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 12–14], which might reduce healthcare expenditure and decrease the development of antimicrobial resistance. Even high-risk patient groups, such as immunocompromised and cancer patients, have been shown to benefit from shorter antibiotic treatment [19].

An international expert consensus on PCT-guided antibiotic stewardship proposed an algorithm for PCT use in critically ill patients [18]. The protocol incorporates PCT results in clinical assessment and suggests discontinuation of antibiotics if PCT <0.5 µg/L or if a reduction of PCT by more than 80% is present regardless of the source of infection. The role of PCT in the initiation of empirical antibiotic therapy in severely ill patients is still to be defined. Clinical judgment is currently the most important, and diagnostic tests, including biomarkers, might provide added value.

PCT testing was implemented in the emergency laboratory of the department of laboratory diagnostics in October 2016. As an initial management strategy, only the emergency department and all intensive care units gained unlimited access to direct test ordering through the hospital information system, all other wards were instructed to contact the laboratory before test ordering.

The primary endpoint of our research was to investigate the clinical applicability of routine PCT measurement in the medical ICU within the tertiary referral hospital, particularly with respect to antibiotic stewardship.

Secondary endpoints were to analyze the correlation of PCT with disease severity and source of infection, as well as the applicability of PCT in immunocompromised patients with a suspected infection.

Material and methods

This was an epidemiological prospective single center study carried out in the medical ICU at the University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Croatia.

Consecutive series of patients hospitalized from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2018 were included in the study.

Inclusion criteria were critically ill adult patients (≥18 years old) with suspected infection. Immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients were included. The immunocompromised patient is defined as one in whom any aspect of host defense is deficient.

The suspected infection was defined to involve a patient who had one or several clinical symptoms of infection (fever, tachycardia, tachypnea, cough, dysuria), inflammatory markers and microbiological cultures were requested by attending physicians, and empirical antibiotic therapy was initiated.

Patients admitted due to the noninfective causes were excluded from the study.

Sepsis and septic shock were defined according to the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) [20].

Acute kidney injury (AKI) was defined according to the KDIGO 2012 criteria as follows: 1) increase in serum creatinine (SCr) by ≥0.3 mg/dl (≥26.5 µmol/l) within 48 h or 2) increase in SCr to ≥1.5 times baseline, which is known or presumed to have occurred within the prior 7 days or urine volume <0.5 ml/kg/h for 6 h [21].

The Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) [22] and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) [23] scores are routinely used in a critical care setting to assess organ dysfunction and/or predict mortality.

Inflammatory markers measured at admission were white blood cells (WBC), C‑reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin (PCT). All tests were performed in the hospital department of laboratory diagnostics.

PCT testing was performed using Elecsys Brahms automated chemiluminescence immunoassay applied to Roche Cobas CE 6000 system (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). Analytical sensitivity (detection limit) of the test is 0.02 µg/L, while functional sensitivity (quantification limit) defined as the coefficient of variation <20% is 0.06 µg/L. Test result interpretation guidance according to risk categories with respect to PCT (µg/L) values was provided by our laboratory as follows: 1) PCT <0.5 µg/L low risk of systemic bacterial or fungal infection, 2) PCT 0.5–2.0 µg/L substantial risk of systemic bacterial or fungal infection, 3) PCT 2.0–10 µg/L high risk of sepsis and progression to septic shock, PCT >10 µg/L high risk of septic shock [24]. The laboratory set turnaround time for test results was 60 min. According to available guidelines, minimum PCT retesting interval was set within the hospital laboratory order entry system at 24 h [25].

The positivity of blood cultures depended on the isolated microorganism. The following microorganisms were considered as skin contaminants: non-Staphylococcus aureus Staphylococci (e.g., coagulase-negative Staphylococci, Staphylococcus haemoliticus, Staphylococcus intermedius, Staphylococcus capitis, etc), Corynebacterium species, Bacillus species, Propionibacterium species and Micrococcus species.

All data were analyzed using SPSS for Windows, version 23.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Numerical data were analyzed for homogeneity using Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests. Normally distributed data were expressed as means and standard deviation (SD), non-normally distributed data as median with interquartile range (IQR). The Student’s t‑test was used when comparing mean values and Mann-Whitney U-test when comparing medians. Categorical data comparison was carried out using the χ2-test. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

The Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Centre Zagreb approved this research as a non-sponsored prospective epidemiological study. Considering the design of the study and possible exceptions to the rule of informed consent [26], the informed consent was waived for the present study.

Results

In the reporting period, 619 patients were hospitalized in the medical ICU, out of which 129 (20.8%) had suspected infection. The median age was 64 years (39–89 years) with 63.6% male patients. Sepsis and pneumonia were the most common admission diagnoses. Immunocompromised patients constituted 39.5% of the included patients (Table 1). Mechanical ventilation was administered in 65 patients (50.4%), 38 patients (29.5%) received vasoactive therapy, 54 patients (42%) developed AKI, of which 18 (33%) received renal replacement therapy (RRT). The median ICU length of stay (ICU LOS) was 10 (2–18) days and 100 patients (77.5%) were discharged from ICU alive.

Table 1

Baseline demographics and inflammatory markers at admission. Values are medians with interquartile ranges

	All patients(N = 129)
Age (years)	64 ± 25
Male gender, n (%)	83 (63.6)
Admission diagnoses
Sepsis, n (%)	51 (39.5)
Pneumonia, n (%)	38 (29.5)
Pancreatitis, n (%)	6 (4.6)
Other, n (%)	34 (26.4)
Comorbidities
Diabetes, n (%)	28 (21.7)
Hypertension, n (%)	44 (34.1)
Chronic renal failure	21 (16.2)
Chronic hemodialysis	14 (10.8)
Hematologic malignancy	35 (27.1)
Autoimmune disease	10 (7.8)
Neoplasm, solid	7 (5.4)
Transplantation of solid organ, previously	5 (3.9)
APACHE II	21 ± 14
SOFA	7 ± 6
SOFA >2, n (%)	120 (93)
Neutropenic patients, n (%)	22 (17.1)
Immunocompromised patients, n (%)	51 (39.5)
Recent chemotherapy, n (%)	28 (21.7)
PCT, entire cohort (µg/L)	1.66 ± 11.43
PCT, without previous AB (µg/L)	1.56 ± 8 NS
PCT, with previous AB (µg/L)	1.44 ± 13 NS
CRP, entire cohort (mg/L)	102 ± 166
CRP, without previous AB (mg/L)	127 ± 171 NS
CRP, with previous AB (mg/L)	98 ± 137 NS
WBC (109/L)	L 11.6 ± 9.5

APACHE II Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation II, SOFA Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, PCT procalcitonin, CRP C-reactive protein, WBC white blood cells, AB antibiotic therapy, Other cardiac decompensation, cardiac arrest, pulmonary embolism, local infection, Hematologic malignancy leukemia, lymphoma, NS not statistically significant

*Statistically significant, p < 0.05

Pneumonia was the most frequent infection (87 patients, 67.4%), followed by intra-abdominal infections (13 patients, 10%), and urinary tract infections (10 patients, 7.8%), 16 patients (14.8%) had another source of infection (endocarditis, soft tissue, bone). Microbiological cultures were positive in 86 (66.7%) patients. Gram-negative microorganisms predominated in all microbiological specimens (Table 2).

Table 2

Microorganisms isolated from blood cultures, urine cultures and endotracheal aspirates

	Microorganism	N
Blood culture	Escherichia coli	8
	Pseudomonas aeruginosa	8
	Acinetobacter baumannii	7
	Klebsiella pneumoniae	4
	Haemophilus influenzae	2
	Raoultella species	2
	Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis	6
	Staphylococcus speciesa	3
	Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus	2
	Staphylococcus hominisa	2
	Staphylococcus aureus	1
	Clostridium perfringens	1
Urine culture	Escherichia coli	9
	Pseudomonas aeruginosa	8
	Klebsiella pneumoniae	4
	Enterobacter species	2
	Morganella morganii	1
	Acinetobacter baumannii	1
	Enterococcus faecalis	7
Endotracheal aspirate	Pseudomonas aeruginosa	14
	Klebsiella pneumoniae	10
	Acinetobacter baumannii	6
	Stenotrophomonas maltophilia	4
	Enterobacter cloacae	3
	Serratia marcescens	1
	Haemophilus influenzae	1
	Citrobacter freundii	1
	Streptococcus species	8
	Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium	6
	Staphylococcus aureus	4
	Staphylococcus species	3
	Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus	3

aFrom 4 bottles of blood culture on 2 subsequent days with the same susceptibility

A significant correlation was observed among PCT and APACHE II, PCT and SOFA and PCT and CRP (Fig. 1). No correlation was detected between CRP and APACHE II (r = 0.05, p = 0.55), CRP and SOFA (r = −0.004 p = 0.9625), WBC and APACHE II (r = −0.015, p = 0.87), WBC and SOFA (r = −0.12, p = 0.18).

Fig. 1

a Correlation among PCT (µg/L) and APACHE II (Spearman’s rho 0.461, p < 0.01), b correlation among PCT (µg/L) and SOFA (Spearman’s rho 0.494, p < 0.01) and c correlation among PCT (µg/L) and CRP (mg/L) (Spearman’s rho 0.403, p < 0.01)

Inflammatory markers for the entire cohort at admission are presented in Table 1.

Most patients (83, 64.3%) received antibiotics before admission. No difference in PCT nor CRP was observed concerning previous antibiotic therapy (Table 1).

The PCT and CRP levels were significantly increased in patients with positive blood cultures, the infection caused by Gram-negative microorganism regardless of disease severity (no difference in SOFA and APACHE II scores), and pneumonia with complications (Table 3). PCT did not differ among patients with positive vs. negative urine culture or positive vs. negative endotracheal aspirate (Table 4). Patients with positive endotracheal aspirates had significantly higher APACHE II and SOFA scores than patients without isolated microorganisms from the endotracheal aspirate.

Table 3

Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein according to blood culture positivity and pneumonia with complications. Values are medians with interquartile ranges

Variable	BC+	BC−	BC+G+	BC+G−	PNM, not complicated	PNM,with shock	PNM,BC−	PNM,BC+
N	46	61	15	31	46	29	35	40
PCT, µg/L	8.2 (1–25.3)*	0.6 (0.2–4.36)*	1.9 (0.6–12.8)*	15.9 (3.5–59.1)*	1.1 (0.4–3.7)*	16.5 (4.4–50.9)*	0.9 (0.4–8)a	7.2 (0.9–22.7)a
CRP, mg/L	167 (64–295)*	86 (51–169)*	139 (32–261)**	181 (100–335)**	80 (48–163)*	194 (122–328)*	108 (55–195)NS	143 (53–267) NS

PCT procalcitonin, CRP C reactive protein, − negative, + positive, BC blood culture, G Gram, PNM pneumonia, NS not significant

*Statistically significant, p < 0.001; ** statistically significant p = 0.004

aStatistically significant p = 0.012

Table 4

Procalcitonin and C‑reactive protein values according to urine culture and endotracheal aspirate. Values are medians with interquartile ranges

	UC +	UC −	ETA +	ETA −
PCT (µg/L)	4.6 (0.4–15.2)	1.7 (0.2–12.0)	1.93 (0.3–12.1)	1.7 (0.3–12.6)
CRP (mg/L)	134 (57–216.6)	104 (52.2–223.2)	99 (56–188)	108 (53.3–250)
APACHE II	21 (15–28)	20 (14–28)	23 (17–29)*	19 (12–25)*
SOFA	7 (5–11)	7 (4–10)	8 (5–12)*	6 (3–9)*

PCT procalcitonin, CRP C reactive protein, UC urine culture, ETA endotracheal aspirate, − negative, + positive, APACHE II Acute Physiology, And Chronic Health Evaluation II, SOFA Sequential Organ Failure Assessment

*Statistically significant, p < 0.05

Median time from ICU admission to PCT testing was 1 day (1 ± 2 days), and control PCT was ordered 2 days later (2 ± 3 days). Antimicrobial treatment change based on PCT value was done in 36 patients (28%). The antibiotic therapy was discontinued in 7 patients in whom control PCT was lower than 0.5 µg/L or a reduction of PCT by more than 80% was detected. None of the patients developed reinfections. For those 7 patients, antibiotic treatment was shortened for 1.5 days in comparison to standard protocol, and those patients were discharged from the ICU 1 day earlier in comparison to the standard of care. Patients in whom antibiotic therapy was discontinued (n = 7) based on PCT measurement had median ICU LOS of 6 days (2–10 days) and patients who continued antibiotic therapy (n = 119) had median ICU LOS of 8 days (0–16 days). The difference is not statistically significant (p = 0.442).

In the other 29 patients, the antimicrobial treatment was either escalated or de-escalated according to PCT results. Due to the increase of control PCT above reference change value (60% change, data provided by our laboratory), the escalation of antimicrobial therapy was done in 19 patients. In patients who were clinically stable and had a decrease of PCT between 60% and 80%, the antibiotic therapy was de-escalated according to microbiological isolates and susceptibility testing.

Discussion

The study presents the evaluation of PCT in severely ill medical patients in a tertiary teaching hospital in Croatia following the introduction of laboratory PCT test for intensive care units. The study included 129 consecutive patients with a suspected infection that required ICU admission.

The initial PCT value correlated with disease severity, including both APACHE II and SOFA scores, which was not the case with other inflammatory markers. We also showed a positive correlation between PCT and CRP, which is considered the most frequently used inflammatory biomarker. The advantages of PCT over CRP are a rapid value increase in bacterial infections (2–4 h) [27] and relatively short half-life (22–30 h) accompanied by a rapidly declining level following the resolution of infection [28].

Most patients received antimicrobial therapy before the ICU admission; however, no difference in PCT (1.56 ± 8 µg/L vs. 1.44 ± 13 µg/L, p = 0.6) was observed with respect to previous antibiotic therapy. This finding might be explained by the fact that patients’ condition deteriorated despite initiated antibiotic therapy, which suggests inadequate antimicrobial treatment and/or uncontrolled infection. The obtained results indicate that PCT is also a reliable marker in patients who were pretreated with antibiotics. This is important because most of the studies on PCT in critical illness excluded patients who received antibiotic therapy for longer than 48 h prior to ICU admission [3, 6, 8, 11, 13]. One of the exceptions is the study by Stolz et al. on 101 patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia, in which 75% of the patients had received antibiotic before inclusion in the study and median PCT levels were similar in patients pretreated with antibiotics (0.73 µg/L) and in patients without antibiotic exposure (0.72 µg/L) [9]. In that study PCT measurement was done using a time-resolved amplified cryptate emission technology assay (Kryptor® PCT, Brahms AG, Hennigsdorf, Germany) which gives results comparable to the assay used in our study.

The PCT level depended on the site of infection, being the highest in patients with positive blood cultures (8.2 ± 24.1 µg/L), lower in those with positive urine culture (4.6 ± 16 µg/L), and the lowest in patients with the positive endotracheal aspirate (1.93 ± 11.4 µg/L). Previous research also showed that PCT levels differ regarding the source of infection, being the highest in patients with positive blood cultures and the lowest in patients with positive endotracheal aspirates [9, 13, 29]. Moreover, in the presented study patients with isolated Gram-negative bacteria in blood cultures had significantly higher PCT and CRP than patients who had documented bloodstream infections with Gram-positive bacteria. Studies regarding PCT level and Gram-positive vs. Gram-negative infections provide contradictory results. While some studies found no difference between the baseline PCT levels and the PCT levels measured over time in patients with Gram-positive versus Gram-negative infections [8], others claimed that PCT levels differentiate Gram-negative from Gram-positive bacterial and fungal sepsis [30, 31]. In the current study, PCT was also significantly elevated in patients who had pneumonia with complications. The possibility that elevated levels of PCT indicate a more severe disease caused by Gram-negative bacteria might be a useful information in everyday clinical practice.

The available evidence demonstrates that PCT-guided antibiotic stewardship effectively reduces the total duration of antimicrobial therapy (antibiotic days), which ranges from 5% [14] to even 20–30% [3, 5, 6, 9, 12]; this reduction is accompanied by a reduction in antimicrobial costs [6, 12]. A systematic review by Huang et al. determined that PCT-guided antibiotic discontinuation strategy resulted in fewer total days with antibiotics and longer antibiotic-free days. The antibiotic days decreased for 1.7 days and antibiotic-free days increased for approximately 2.3 days [16]. Wirz et al. showed that PCT-guided protocols moderately reduced antibiotics by approximately 1 day, 9.3 vs. 10.4 days; however, the effect was most pronounced in the subgroup of patients with skin/soft tissue infections in which reduction of antibiotic duration was approximately 4 days [17]. The reduction in the duration of antimicrobial therapy might slow down the emergence of antimicrobial resistance and decrease healthcare costs. On the other hand, a Cochrane systematic review showed that PCT-guided protocols contribute to earlier administration of antibiotics [32], which might be beneficial in severely ill patients because every delay in timely treatment is associated with worse outcomes [1].

Even though PCT-guided algorithms are relatively simple, the adherence to protocols is usually low or moderate [3, 5, 10, 12, 14]; however, the adherence to protocols is higher in clinical centers that routinely use biomarkers in clinical assessment [4, 8, 9, 13] indicating that better acquaintance with the method might lead to more successful acceptance of protocols. In the current study, PCT-guided stewardship was successfully applied in 36 patients (28%). The incomplete application of PCT-guided stewardship in our patient series could be partially explained by a lack of experience and confidence in the studied biomarker. In addition, PCT-guided stewardship has still not been extensively and adequately evaluated in infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) microorganisms, which were isolated in a significant proportion of our patients.

The novelty presented in this study pertains to the patient case-mix, especially a high proportion of immunocompromised patients reaching almost 40% of the entire cohort. Previous studies found procalcitonin as a reliable diagnostic marker of bacteremia in febrile patients with malignancies [33-35]; however, the biomarker was not comprehensively investigated in critically ill immunocompromised patients. Bele et al. showed that increased PCT concentration (>0.5 µg/L) on the first day of the disease had 100% sensitivity and 63% specificity for diagnosing bacterial sepsis in critically ill immunocompromised patients, which implies that bacterial infections can be accurately ruled out if the threshold of 0.5 µg/L is not reached [32]. Our results indicate that PCT can predict the severity of the disease, source of infection, and possibly differentiate Gram-negative from Gram-positive sepsis in immunocompromised severely ill patients.

Another biomarker that has been investigated in sepsis is interleukin‑6 (IL-6), which is released in response to tissue injury or an inflammatory stimulus [33] and the magnitude of its elevation correlates with the extent of tissue trauma/injury severity [34]. The blood IL‑6 levels are elevated in patients with sepsis and septic shock [35, 36], correlate with disease severity [35-37], and possibly predict unfavorable outcome [36]. Moreover, IL‑6 could be a faster indicator of treatment success in adults with severe sepsis and septic shock compared to PCT and CRP [37]; however, some studies found no additive effect for IL‑6 in the diagnosis of the severe infection in critically ill patients [38]. In a recently published systematic review regarding biomarkers of sepsis, Pierrakos et al. indicated that IL‑6 in comparison with PCT and/or CRP for sepsis diagnosis provided conflicting findings and that so far IL‑6 was not evaluated for prognostic value in large clinical studies [39]. Given the above, more data from comprehensive clinical studies are needed to properly evaluate the utility of IL‑6 in everyday clinical practice. Following such approach bedside or point of care tests for measurement of IL‑6 are being developed and validated [40]. It is possible that enhanced accessibility of the method, together with a short time to result and low costs would enable broader clinical usage and evaluation of IL‑6.

Our study has several limitations. First, the implementation of PCT-guided stewardship is only moderate, which might be explained by failure to strictly follow the algorithms available in the scientific literature. The antibiotic treatment was discontinued for 7 patients and modified for 29 patients according to the PCT results. It seems that termination of antibiotic therapy in seven patients did not harm the patients since there was no recorded reinfection or other adverse effects. Moreover, the application of PCT-guided stewardship led to shorter ICU LOS which might lead to the reduction of healthcare costs; however, the number of patients is too low to show statistical significance. The second limitation pertains to the patient case-mix. The presented population of patients is quite heterogeneous. While this diversity reflects everyday reality in the medical ICU, it may cause inaccurate interpretation of patient subgroups.

To conclude, this study shows that PCT can be used as an additional marker of disease severity in critically ill patients. Increased initial PCT levels might point to the development of more severe disease caused by Gram-negative bacteria and PCT might be considered as a valuable marker of infection in patients who were pretreated with antibiotics. This pertains to immunocompetent as well as immunocompromised patients. Implementation of PCT-guided stewardship should be encouraged and will probably increase with gaining further experience in clinical interpretation of novel routine biomarkers in the decision-making process.