Sarah Marowski1, Yiwei Xu1, Jake A Greenberg1, Luke M Funk1,2, Anne O Lidor1, Amber L Shada3. 1. Department of Surgery, Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53792, USA. 2. Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison; William S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital, Madison, WI, USA. 3. Department of Surgery, Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53792, USA. shada@surgery.wisc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gastroparesis (GP) is hallmarked by nausea, vomiting, and early satiety. While dietary and medical therapy are the mainstay of treatment, surgery has been used to palliate symptoms. Two established first-line surgical options are gastric electrostimulation (GES) and pyloric procedures (PP) including pyloroplasty or pyloromyotomy. We sought to compare these modalities' improvement in Gastroparesis cardinal symptom index (GCSI) subscores and potential predictors of therapy failure. METHODS: All patients undergoing surgery at a single institution were prospectively identified and separated by surgery: GES, PP, or combined GESPP. GCSI was collected preoperatively, at 6 weeks and 1 year. Postoperative GCSI score over 2.5 or receipt of another gastroparesis operation were considered treatment failures. Groups were compared using Pearson's chi-squared and Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were included: 18 GES, 51 PP, and 13 GESPP. Mean age was 44, BMI was 26.7, and 80% were female. Preoperative GCSI was 3.7. The PP group was older with more postsurgical gastroparesis. More patients with diabetes underwent GESPP. Preoperative symptom scores and gastric emptying were similar among all groups. All surgical therapies resulted in a significantly improved GCSI and nausea/vomiting subscore at 6 weeks and 1 year. Bloating improved initially, but relapsed in the GES and GESPP group. Satiety improved initially, but relapsed in the PP group. Fifty-nine (72%) had surgical success. Ten underwent additional surgery (7 crossed into the GESPP group, 3 underwent gastric resection). Treatment failures had higher preoperative GCSI, bloating, and satiety scores. Treatment failures and successes had similar preoperative gastric emptying. CONCLUSIONS: Both gastric electrical stimulation and pyloric surgery are successful gastroparesis treatments, with durable improvement in nausea and vomiting. Choice of operation should be guided by patient characteristics and discussion of surgical risks and benefits. Combination GESPP does not appear to confer an advantage over GES or PP alone.
BACKGROUND:Gastroparesis (GP) is hallmarked by nausea, vomiting, and early satiety. While dietary and medical therapy are the mainstay of treatment, surgery has been used to palliate symptoms. Two established first-line surgical options are gastric electrostimulation (GES) and pyloric procedures (PP) including pyloroplasty or pyloromyotomy. We sought to compare these modalities' improvement in Gastroparesis cardinal symptom index (GCSI) subscores and potential predictors of therapy failure. METHODS: All patients undergoing surgery at a single institution were prospectively identified and separated by surgery: GES, PP, or combined GESPP. GCSI was collected preoperatively, at 6 weeks and 1 year. Postoperative GCSI score over 2.5 or receipt of another gastroparesis operation were considered treatment failures. Groups were compared using Pearson's chi-squared and Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were included: 18 GES, 51 PP, and 13 GESPP. Mean age was 44, BMI was 26.7, and 80% were female. Preoperative GCSI was 3.7. The PP group was older with more postsurgical gastroparesis. More patients with diabetes underwent GESPP. Preoperative symptom scores and gastric emptying were similar among all groups. All surgical therapies resulted in a significantly improved GCSI and nausea/vomiting subscore at 6 weeks and 1 year. Bloating improved initially, but relapsed in the GES and GESPP group. Satiety improved initially, but relapsed in the PP group. Fifty-nine (72%) had surgical success. Ten underwent additional surgery (7 crossed into the GESPP group, 3 underwent gastric resection). Treatment failures had higher preoperative GCSI, bloating, and satiety scores. Treatment failures and successes had similar preoperative gastric emptying. CONCLUSIONS: Both gastric electrical stimulation and pyloric surgery are successful gastroparesis treatments, with durable improvement in nausea and vomiting. Choice of operation should be guided by patient characteristics and discussion of surgical risks and benefits. Combination GESPP does not appear to confer an advantage over GES or PP alone.
Authors: Amber L Shada; Christy M Dunst; Radu Pescarus; Emily A Speer; Maria Cassera; Kevin M Reavis; Lee L Swanstrom Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2015-08-21 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Brian R Davis; Irene Sarosiek; Mohammad Bashashati; Ben Alvarado; Richard W McCallum Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2016-11-28 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Amber Shada; Alex Nielsen; Sarah Marowski; Melissa Helm; Luke M Funk; Andrew Kastenmeier; Anne Lidor; Jon C Gould Journal: Surgery Date: 2018-07-30 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Thomas Abell; Richard McCallum; Michael Hocking; Kenneth Koch; Hasse Abrahamsson; Isabelle Leblanc; Greger Lindberg; Jan Konturek; Thomas Nowak; Eammon M M Quigley; Gervais Tougas; Warren Starkebaum Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Dennis A Revicki; Anne M Rentz; Dominique Dubois; Peter Kahrilas; Vincenzo Stanghellini; Nicholas J Talley; Jan Tack Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: John Rodriguez; Andrew T Strong; Ivy N Haskins; Joshua P Landreneau; Matthew T Allemang; Kevin El-Hayek; James Villamere; Chao Tu; Michael S Cline; Matthew Kroh; Jeffrey L Ponsky Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Matthew Heckroth; Robert T Luckett; Chris Moser; Dipendra Parajuli; Thomas L Abell Journal: J Clin Gastroenterol Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 3.174