Lauren E Arthur1, Lauren Slattery2, William Richardson2,3. 1. Department of General Surgery, Ochsner Clinical School, The University of Queensland School of Medicine, 1514 Jefferson Highway, New Orleans, LA, 70121, USA. lauren.arthur@uqconnect.edu.au. 2. Ochsner Clinical School, The University of Queensland School of Medicine, New Orleans, USA. 3. Department of Surgery, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gastroparesis is difficult to treat and many patients do not report relief of symptoms with medical therapy alone. Several operative approaches have been described. This study shows the results of our selective surgical approach for patients with gastroparesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of prospective data from our electronic medical record and data symptom sheet. All patients had a pre-operative gastric emptying study showing gastroparesis, an esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and either a CT or an upper GI series with small bowel follow-through. All patients had pre- and post-operative symptom sheets where seven symptoms were scored for severity and frequency on a scale of 0-4. The scores were analyzed by a professional statistician using paired sample t test. RESULTS: 58 patients met inclusion criteria. 33 had gastric stimulator (GES), 7 pyloroplasty (PP), 16 with both gastric stimulator and pyloroplasty (GSP), and 2 sleeve gastrectomy. For patients in the GSP group, the second procedure was performed if there was inadequate improvement with the first procedure. There was no mortality. The follow-up period was 6-316 weeks (mean 66.107, SD 69.42). GES significantly improved frequency and severity for all symptoms except frequency of bloating and postprandial fullness. PP significantly improved nausea and vomiting severity, frequency of nausea, and early satiety. Symptom improvement for GSP was measured from after the first to after the second procedure. GSP significantly improved all but vomiting severity and frequency of early satiety, postprandial fullness, and epigastric pain. CONCLUSION: All procedures significantly improved symptoms, although numbers are small in the PP group. GES demonstrates more improvement than PP, and if PP or GES does not adequately improve symptoms GSP is appropriate. In our practice, gastrectomy was reserved as a last resort.
BACKGROUND:Gastroparesis is difficult to treat and many patients do not report relief of symptoms with medical therapy alone. Several operative approaches have been described. This study shows the results of our selective surgical approach for patients with gastroparesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of prospective data from our electronic medical record and data symptom sheet. All patients had a pre-operative gastric emptying study showing gastroparesis, an esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and either a CT or an upper GI series with small bowel follow-through. All patients had pre- and post-operative symptom sheets where seven symptoms were scored for severity and frequency on a scale of 0-4. The scores were analyzed by a professional statistician using paired sample t test. RESULTS: 58 patients met inclusion criteria. 33 had gastric stimulator (GES), 7 pyloroplasty (PP), 16 with both gastric stimulator and pyloroplasty (GSP), and 2 sleeve gastrectomy. For patients in the GSP group, the second procedure was performed if there was inadequate improvement with the first procedure. There was no mortality. The follow-up period was 6-316 weeks (mean 66.107, SD 69.42). GES significantly improved frequency and severity for all symptoms except frequency of bloating and postprandial fullness. PP significantly improved nausea and vomiting severity, frequency of nausea, and early satiety. Symptom improvement for GSP was measured from after the first to after the second procedure. GSP significantly improved all but vomiting severity and frequency of early satiety, postprandial fullness, and epigastric pain. CONCLUSION: All procedures significantly improved symptoms, although numbers are small in the PP group. GES demonstrates more improvement than PP, and if PP or GES does not adequately improve symptoms GSP is appropriate. In our practice, gastrectomy was reserved as a last resort.
Authors: Amber L Shada; Christy M Dunst; Radu Pescarus; Emily A Speer; Maria Cassera; Kevin M Reavis; Lee L Swanstrom Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2015-08-21 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Brian R Davis; Irene Sarosiek; Mohammad Bashashati; Ben Alvarado; Richard W McCallum Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2016-11-28 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: A W Forstner-Barthell; M M Murr; S Nitecki; M Camilleri; C M Prather; K A Kelly; M G Sarr Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 1999 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Sarah Marowski; Yiwei Xu; Jake A Greenberg; Luke M Funk; Anne O Lidor; Amber L Shada Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2020-10-06 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Joshua P Landreneau; Andrew T Strong; Kevin El-Hayek; Chao Tu; James Villamere; Jeffrey L Ponsky; Matthew D Kroh; John H Rodriguez Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Jamil S Samaan; Omar Toubat; Evan T Alicuben; Sean Dewberry; Adrian Dobrowolski; Kulmeet Sandhu; Joerg Zehetner; John C Lipham; Kamran Samakar Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2022-03-25 Impact factor: 3.453