Literature DB >> 30004920

Per-oral Pyloromyotomy (POP) for Medically Refractory Gastroparesis: Short Term Results From the First 100 Patients at a High Volume Center.

John Rodriguez1,2, Andrew T Strong1,2, Ivy N Haskins3, Joshua P Landreneau1, Matthew T Allemang1, Kevin El-Hayek1,2,4, James Villamere1, Chao Tu5, Michael S Cline2,6, Matthew Kroh1,2,7, Jeffrey L Ponsky1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: For patients with gastroparesis, temporary pyloric disruption has been shown to improve symptoms and gastric emptying. Per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP) is an innovative endoscopic procedure to divide the pylorus from within a submucosal tunnel, as a corollary to surgical pyloromyotomy. Here we evaluate subjective and objective outcomes 12-weeks after POP at a high volume center.
METHODS: The first 100 consecutive patients undergoing POP were included, with procedure dates between January 2016 and October 2017. Patients were evaluated using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI), and 4-hour solid-phase scintigraphic gastric emptying studies (GES) prior to procedure and at 90 days post-POP
RESULTS: : The study cohort was 85% female with a mean age of 45.0 ± 14.6 years. Gastroparesis etiologies were divided among idiopathic (56%), diabetic (21%), postsurgical (19%), and other in 4%. There were 67% of the patients who had previous endoscopic or surgical interventions for gastroparesis. Most POP procedures were performed in the operating room (97%) and were completed in an average of 33 minutes. Ten patients incurred complications (10%), which included 1 diagnostic laparoscopy and 2 cases of gastrointestinal bleeding. Overall GCSI improved from a preoperative mean of 3.82 ± 0.86 to 2.54 ± 1.2 (P < 0.001). The improvement in each GCSI subscore was also highly statistically significant. Among the patients with postoperative GES available, 78% had objectively better 4-hour emptying with a mean improvement in retention by 23.6% (P < 0.001). This included 57% of patients with normal gastric emptying post-POP.
CONCLUSION: For patients with medically refractory gastroparesis, POP results in both subjective and objective improvement in the majority of patients. Prior intervention does not obviate POP as a therapeutic option. POP should be included along the treatment algorithm for patients with gastroparesis as an organ-sparing procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30004920     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  9 in total

1.  Per-Oral Pyloromyotomy (POP) for Medically Refractory Post-Surgical Gastroparesis.

Authors:  Andrew T Strong; Joshua P Landreneau; Michael Cline; Matthew D Kroh; John H Rodriguez; Jeffrey L Ponsky; Kevin El-Hayek
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Gastrectomy versus stomach left in situ with Roux-en-Y reconstruction for the treatment of gastroparesis.

Authors:  Joshua P Landreneau; Andrew T Strong; Kevin El-Hayek; Matthew D Kroh; John H Rodriguez
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  POEM, GPOEM, and ZPOEM.

Authors:  Nasim Parsa; David Friedel; Stavros N Stavropoulos
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Gastroparesis with concomitant gastrointestinal dysmotility is not a contraindication for per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP).

Authors:  Abhiram Kondajji; Michael Klingler; Chao Tu; Rebecca Kelley; Kevin El-Hayek; John Rodriquez; Michael Cline; Alisan Fathalizadeh; Matthew Allemang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 3.453

5.  Both gastric electrical stimulation and pyloric surgery offer long-term symptom improvement in patients with gastroparesis.

Authors:  Sarah Marowski; Yiwei Xu; Jake A Greenberg; Luke M Funk; Anne O Lidor; Amber L Shada
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Sleeve gastrectomy for treatment of delayed gastric emptying-indications, technique, and results.

Authors:  Arielle Marian Lee; Karl-Hermann Fuchs; Gabor Varga; Wolfram Breithaupt; Kai Neki; Ryan Broderick; Santiago Horgan
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 7.  Peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy for gastroparesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Karime Lucas Uemura; Dalton Chaves; Wanderley M Bernardo; Ricardo Sato Uemura; Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura; Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2020-06-16

Review 8.  Recent advances in third space or intramural endoscopy.

Authors:  Akshay B Shanbhag; Prashanthi N Thota; Madhusudhan R Sanaka
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2020-12-16

9.  Real-time intraoperative functioning lumen imaging probe during endoscopic per-oral pyloromyotomy (pop).

Authors:  Alisan Fathalizadeh; Michael Klingler; Joshua Landreneau; Matthew Allemang; John Rodriguez; Jeffrey Ponsky; Kevin El-Hayek
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 4.584

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.