| Literature DB >> 33024212 |
J Christopher Noone1,2, Marc Stegger3, Berit Lilje3, Knut Stavem4,5,6, Karin Helmersen7,8, Inge Skråmm9, Hege Vangstein Aamot7.
Abstract
A retrospective study of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from orthopaedic patients treated between 2000 and 2017 at Akershus University Hospital, Norway was performed using a genome-wide association approach. The aim was to characterize and investigate molecular characteristics unique to S. aureus isolates from HHA associated prosthetic joint infections and potentially explain the HHA patients' elevated 1-year mortality compared to a non-HHA group. The comparison group consisted of patients with non-HHA lower-extremity implant-related S. aureus infections. S. aureus isolates from diagnostic patient samples were whole-genome sequenced. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to detect group-associated genetic signatures. A total of 62 HHA patients and 73 non-HHA patients were included. Median age (81 years vs. 74 years; p < 0.001) and 1-year mortality (44% vs. 15%, p < 0.001) were higher in the HHA group. A total of 20 clonal clusters (CCs) were identified; 75% of the isolates consisted of CC45, CC30, CC5, CC15, and CC1. Analyses of core and accessory genome content, including virulence, resistance genes, and k-mer analysis revealed few group-associated variants, none of which could explain the elevated 1-year mortality in HHA patients. Our findings support the premise that all S. aureus can cause invasive infections given the opportunity.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33024212 PMCID: PMC7538562 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-73736-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1A centre rooted SNP based phylogenetic tree of all S. aureus isolates from hip hemiarthroplasty (n = 62) and comparison group (n = 73) isolates collected at Akershus University Hospital between 2000 and 2017. The tree is based on core genome SNPs visualized in iTOL v4.2.3. (https://itol.embl.de/) (https://itol.embl.de/). The coloured sectors indicate the five dominant clonal complex types. Colour strips along the circumference indicate group affiliation (red and green) and, where relevant, 1-year all cause postoperative mortality (black).
Patient demographics and risk factors of the study’s hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA) and comparison group (non-HHA) patients collected at Akershus University Hospital 2000–2017.
| HHA (n = 62) | Non-HHA (n = 73) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender, male/female | 22/40 | 34/39 | 0.194 |
| Total hip arthroplasty | 15/19 | ||
| Total knee arthroplasty | 2/4 | ||
| Headless compression screws | 9/13 | ||
| Ankle | 8/3 | ||
| Age at surgery, median [range] | 81 [61–98] | 74 [24–104] | < 0.001 |
| Acute surgery | 62 (100) | 39 (65) | < 0.001 |
| Elective surgery | 0 | 22 (35) | |
| 1 | 0 | 5 (7) | 0.001 |
| 2 | 21 (34) | 40 (55) | |
| 3 | 37 (60) | 25 (34) | |
| 4 | 3 (5) | 1 (1) | |
| 0 | 19 (31) | 30(42) | 0.373 |
| 1 | 31 (50) | 30 (42) | |
| 2 | 11 (18) | 9 (13) | |
| 3 | 0 | 2 (3) | |
aASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification.
bNNIS, The Center for Disease Control’s National Nosocomial Surveillance system.
Distribution of the clonal complexes and resistance genes in patients with S. aureus infections across the hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA) group (n = 62) and the non-HHA comparison group (n = 73).
| Clonal complex, n (%) | HHA | Non-HHA |
|---|---|---|
| 45 | 11 (18) | 24 (33) |
| 30 | 16 (26) | 18 (25) |
| 5 | 10 (16) | 3 (4) |
| 15 | 4 (6) | 6 (8) |
| 1 | 5 (8) | 4 (5) |
| Othersa | 16 (26) | 18 (25) |
| 0 | 1 (1) | |
| 45 (72) | 51 (70) | |
| 1 (2) | 1 (1) | |
| 3 (5) | 1 (1) | |
| 1(2) | 0 | |
| 2 (3) | 0 | |
| 2 (3) | 1 (1) | |
| 1 (2) | 0 | |
| 1 (2) | 0 | |
| 1 (2) | 0 | |
| 1 (2) | 0 | |
| 4 (6) | 2 (3) | |
| 0 | 0 | |
| Total resistance genes | 62 | 57 |
aOthers: CCs 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 20, 22, 25, 49, 50, 59, 72, 97, 121, and 398.
Figure 2Diagrams from GWAS-based results of single nucleotide polymorphisms variation between HHA (n = 62) and non-HHA comparison (n = 73) groups. (a) DAPC cross validation plot: the X-axis indicates the number of principal components retained in the analyses of each respective column, and the Y-axis the ability of each principal component analysis to predict the samples’ group affiliation; each point represents a repetition of the analysis. (b) DAPC Manhattan plot of all detected SNPs across both the HHA and non-HHA groups; numbers along the X-axis indicate SNP number; the negative logarithm of the association p-value for each SNP is displayed on the Y-axis. Each point on the Manhattan plot represents a SNP. Outliers represent SNPs from which case isolates are significantly over- or under-represented relative to controls. (c) Null distribution subsequent test output from treeWas: the subsequent score measures the proportion of tree branches where group affiliation matches an associated genotype. The red line indicates significance threshold, above which real patient group-correlated risk variants are indicated, thus no group of SNPs retained its significant group association after treeWAS controlled for the confounding effects of lineage. It has been rendered using R software v3.6.1, (https://www.r-project.org/), packages adegenet and treeWAS.