| Literature DB >> 28348869 |
Jason W Sahl1,2, Darrin Lemmer1, Jason Travis1, James M Schupp1, John D Gillece1, Maliha Aziz3, Elizabeth M Driebe1, Kevin P Drees4, Nathan D Hicks5, Charles Hall Davis Williamson2, Crystal M Hepp2, David Earl Smith1, Chandler Roe1, David M Engelthaler1, David M Wagner2, Paul Keim2.
Abstract
Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of bacterial isolates has become standard practice in many laboratories. Applications for WGS analysis include phylogeography and molecular epidemiology, using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as the unit of evolution. NASP was developed as a reproducible method that scales well with the hundreds to thousands of WGS data typically used in comparative genomics applications. In this study, we demonstrate how NASP compares with other tools in the analysis of two real bacterial genomics datasets and one simulated dataset. Our results demonstrate that NASP produces similar, and often better, results in comparison with other pipelines, but is much more flexible in terms of data input types, job management systems, diversity of supported tools and output formats. We also demonstrate differences in results based on the choice of the reference genome and choice of inferring phylogenies from concatenated SNPs or alignments including monomorphic positions. NASP represents a source-available, version-controlled, unit-tested method and can be obtained from tgennorth.github.io/NASP.Entities:
Keywords: Phylogeography; SNPs; bioinformatics
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28348869 PMCID: PMC5320593 DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.000074
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Genom ISSN: 2057-5858