| Literature DB >> 33022941 |
Lena Schröder1, Sina Kaiser1, Burkhardt Flemer1, Jacob Hamm1, Finn Hinrichsen1, Dora Bordoni1, Philip Rosenstiel1, Felix Sommer1.
Abstract
Homeostatic interactions with the microbiome are central for a healthy human physiology and nutrition is the main driving force shaping the microbiome. In the past decade, a wealth of preclinical studies mainly using gnotobiotic animal models demonstrated that malnutrition and chronic inflammation stress these homeostatic interactions and various microbial species and their metabolites or metabolic activities have been associated with disease. For example, the dysregulation of the bacterial metabolism of dietary tryptophan promotes an inflammatory environment and susceptibility to pathogenic infection. Clinical studies have now begun to evaluate the therapeutic potential of nutritional and probiotic interventions in malnutrition and chronic inflammation to ameliorate disease symptoms or even prevent pathogenesis. Here, we therefore summarize the recent progress in this field and propose to move further towards the nutritional targeting of the microbiome for malnutrition and chronic inflammation.Entities:
Keywords: SCFA; immunometabolism; malnutrition; microbiome; nutritional intervention
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33022941 PMCID: PMC7601849 DOI: 10.3390/nu12103032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Concept of microbiome-directed nutritional interventions to treat malnutrition and chronic inflammation. Nutrition directly impacts the pathogenesis of malnutrition and inflammation, for example by fueling host metabolism. However, nutrition is also a main environmental factor shaping the composition and function of the microbiome. Detrimental microbiome alterations such as the loss of beneficial bacteria (for example Akkermansia muciniphila, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Roseburia spp.), which produce and supply short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and vitamins, or the expansion of pathobionts (for example Proteobacteria), which may cause infections in susceptible hosts, could also boost disease pathogenesis or might cause resistance to therapy approaches. In addition, microbial metabolites such as the SCFA butyrate or tryptophan metabolites control various physiological functions in the host ranging from inflammatory responses to the energy metabolism of epithelial cells. Therefore, microbiome-directed and personalized therapy approaches promise to improve treatment efficacy for malnutrition and chronic inflammation, for example inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
Figure 2Roadmap for personalized therapy combining nutrition, microbiome and classical medication. In the past decade, OMICS studies based on next-generation sequencing or metabolomics revealed the associations of alterations in the genome, transcriptome or metabolome with disease states. Longitudinal studies allowed retrospective correlations of dysbiotic signatures with early, late or acute disease. Functional studies of host–microbiome interactions mainly using gnotobiotic animal model-established causality and identified, for example, the central role of the microbiome-related SCFAs and tryptophan metabolites for the regulation of inflammatory responses. Standard patient care (e.g., medication), nutritional interventions (e.g., caloric restriction) or microbiome-directed treatments (e.g., probiotics or fecal microbiome transfer (FMT)) all have beneficial physiological effects. However, combining these therapies in a personalized approach promises to yield a more effective and long-lasting treatment as it was already shown for microbiome-directed complementary food supplements, which outperformed ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF) in resolving malnutrition.