Literature DB >> 33022504

Evaluating the cytotoxicity of a large pool of metal oxide nanoparticles to Escherichia coli: Mechanistic understanding through In Vitro and In Silico studies.

Supratik Kar1, Kavitha Pathakoti2, Paul B Tchounwou2, Danuta Leszczynska3, Jerzy Leszczynski4.   

Abstract

The toxic effect of eight metal oxide nanoparticles (MONPs) on Escherichia coli was experimentally evaluated following standard bioassay protocols. The obtained cytotoxicity ranking of these studied MONPs is Er2O3, Gd2O3, CeO2, Co2O3, Mn2O3, Co3O4, Fe3O4/WO3 (in descending order). The computed EC50 values from experimental data suggested that Er2O3 and Gd2O3 were the most acutely toxic MONPs to E. coli. To identify the mechanism of toxicity of these 8 MONPs along with 17 other MONPs from our previous study, we employed seven classifications and machine learning (ML) algorithms including linear discriminant analysis (LDA), naïve bayes (NB), multinomial logistic regression (MLogitR), sequential minimal optimization (SMO), AdaBoost, J48, and random forest (RF). We also employed 1st and 2nd generation periodic table descriptors developed by us (without any sophisticated computing facilities) along with experimentally analyzed Zeta-potential, to model the cytotoxicity of these MONPs. Based on qualitative validation metrics, the LDA model appeared to be the best among the 7 tested models. The core environment of metal defined by the ratio of the number of core electrons to the number of valence electrons and the electronegativity count of oxygen showed a positive impact on toxicity. The identified properties were important for understanding the mechanisms of nanotoxicity and for predicting the potential environmental risk associated with MONPs exposure. The developed models can be utilized for environmental risk assessment of any untested MONP to E. coli, thereby providing a scientific basis for the design and preparation of safe nanomaterials.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Classification; In silico; In vitro; Machine learning; Metal oxide; Nanoparticles; Toxicity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33022504      PMCID: PMC7919734          DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  44 in total

Review 1.  Advancing risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials: application of computational approaches.

Authors:  Agnieszka Gajewicz; Bakhtiyor Rasulev; Tandabany C Dinadayalane; Piotr Urbaszek; Tomasz Puzyn; Danuta Leszczynska; Jerzy Leszczynski
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 15.470

2.  What if the number of nanotoxicity data is too small for developing predictive Nano-QSAR models? An alternative read-across based approach for filling data gaps.

Authors:  Agnieszka Gajewicz
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 7.790

Review 3.  Grouping of nanomaterials to read-across hazard endpoints: a review.

Authors:  L Lamon; K Aschberger; D Asturiol; A Richarz; A Worth
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 5.913

4.  Toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles in Escherichia coli correlates with conduction band and hydration energies.

Authors:  Chitrada Kaweeteerawat; Angela Ivask; Rong Liu; Haiyuan Zhang; Chong Hyun Chang; Cecile Low-Kam; Heidi Fischer; Zhaoxia Ji; Suman Pokhrel; Yoram Cohen; Donatello Telesca; Jeffrey Zink; Lutz Mädler; Patricia A Holden; Andre Nel; Hilary Godwin
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  The way to cover prediction for cytotoxicity for all existing nano-sized metal oxides by using neural network method.

Authors:  Natalja Fjodorova; Marjana Novic; Agnieszka Gajewicz; Bakhtiyor Rasulev
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 5.913

6.  Where does the toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles come from: The nanoparticles, the ions, or a combination of both?

Authors:  Dali Wang; Zhifen Lin; Ting Wang; Zhifeng Yao; Mengnan Qin; Shourong Zheng; Wei Lu
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 10.588

7.  Quantitative nanostructure-activity relationship modeling.

Authors:  Denis Fourches; Dongqiuye Pu; Carlos Tassa; Ralph Weissleder; Stanley Y Shaw; Russell J Mumper; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 15.881

8.  Importance of Choosing Relevant Biological End Points To Predict Nanoparticle Toxicity with Computational Approaches for Human Health Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Valérie Forest; Jean-François Hochepied; Jérémie Pourchez
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 3.739

9.  Zebrafish high-throughput screening to study the impact of dissolvable metal oxide nanoparticles on the hatching enzyme, ZHE1.

Authors:  Sijie Lin; Yan Zhao; Zhaoxia Ji; Jason Ear; Chong Hyun Chang; Haiyuan Zhang; Cecile Low-Kam; Kristin Yamada; Huan Meng; Xiang Wang; Rong Liu; Suman Pokhrel; Lutz Mädler; Robert Damoiseaux; Tian Xia; Hilary A Godwin; Shuo Lin; André E Nel
Journal:  Small       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 13.281

10.  Comparative toxicity of 24 manufactured nanoparticles in human alveolar epithelial and macrophage cell lines.

Authors:  Sophie Lanone; Françoise Rogerieux; Jorina Geys; Aurélie Dupont; Emmanuelle Maillot-Marechal; Jorge Boczkowski; Ghislaine Lacroix; Peter Hoet
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 9.400

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Metal/metal oxide nanoparticles: Toxicity concerns associated with their physical state and remediation for biomedical applications.

Authors:  Anju Manuja; Balvinder Kumar; Rajesh Kumar; Dharvi Chhabra; Mayukh Ghosh; Mayank Manuja; Basanti Brar; Yash Pal; B N Tripathi; Minakshi Prasad
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2021-11-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.