Literature DB >> 20857979

Quantitative nanostructure-activity relationship modeling.

Denis Fourches1, Dongqiuye Pu, Carlos Tassa, Ralph Weissleder, Stanley Y Shaw, Russell J Mumper, Alexander Tropsha.   

Abstract

Evaluation of biological effects, both desired and undesired, caused by manufactured nanoparticles (MNPs) is of critical importance for nanotechnology. Experimental studies, especially toxicological, are time-consuming, costly, and often impractical, calling for the development of efficient computational approaches capable of predicting biological effects of MNPs. To this end, we have investigated the potential of cheminformatics methods such as quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling to establish statistically significant relationships between measured biological activity profiles of MNPs and their physical, chemical, and geometrical properties, either measured experimentally or computed from the structure of MNPs. To reflect the context of the study, we termed our approach quantitative nanostructure-activity relationship (QNAR) modeling. We have employed two representative sets of MNPs studied recently using in vitro cell-based assays: (i) 51 various MNPs with diverse metal cores (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2008, 105, 7387-7392) and (ii) 109 MNPs with similar core but diverse surface modifiers (Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 1418-1423). We have generated QNAR models using machine learning approaches such as support vector machine (SVM)-based classification and k nearest neighbors (kNN)-based regression; their external prediction power was shown to be as high as 73% for classification modeling and having an R(2) of 0.72 for regression modeling. Our results suggest that QNAR models can be employed for: (i) predicting biological activity profiles of novel nanomaterials, and (ii) prioritizing the design and manufacturing of nanomaterials toward better and safer products.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20857979      PMCID: PMC2997621          DOI: 10.1021/nn1013484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Nano        ISSN: 1936-0851            Impact factor:   15.881


  38 in total

1.  Novel variable selection quantitative structure--property relationship approach based on the k-nearest-neighbor principle

Authors: 
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2000-01

2.  Combinatorial QSAR modeling of chemical toxicants tested against Tetrahymena pyriformis.

Authors:  Hao Zhu; Alexander Tropsha; Denis Fourches; Alexandre Varnek; Ester Papa; Paola Gramatica; Tomas Oberg; Phuong Dao; Artem Cherkasov; Igor V Tetko
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  Toxicology. Transforming environmental health protection.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; George M Gray; John R Bucher
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Nanoparticles: their potential toxicity, waste and environmental management.

Authors:  Grazyna Bystrzejewska-Piotrowska; Jerzy Golimowski; Pawel L Urban
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 7.145

Review 5.  The role of nanotoxicology in realizing the 'helping without harm' paradigm of nanomedicine: lessons from studies of pulmonary effects of single-walled carbon nanotubes.

Authors:  A A Shvedova; V E Kagan
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Guidance for handling and use of nanomaterials at the workplace.

Authors:  M Heinemann; H G Schäfer
Journal:  Hum Exp Toxicol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Trust, but verify: on the importance of chemical structure curation in cheminformatics and QSAR modeling research.

Authors:  Denis Fourches; Eugene Muratov; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 8.  Nanotechnology, nanotoxicology, and neuroscience.

Authors:  Won Hyuk Suh; Kenneth S Suslick; Galen D Stucky; Yoo-Hun Suh
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 11.685

9.  Critical assessment of QSAR models of environmental toxicity against Tetrahymena pyriformis: focusing on applicability domain and overfitting by variable selection.

Authors:  Igor V Tetko; Iurii Sushko; Anil Kumar Pandey; Hao Zhu; Alexander Tropsha; Ester Papa; Tomas Oberg; Roberto Todeschini; Denis Fourches; Alexandre Varnek
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 10.  Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles.

Authors:  Günter Oberdörster; Eva Oberdörster; Jan Oberdörster
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  55 in total

Review 1.  Nanoparticle mediated non-covalent drug delivery.

Authors:  Tennyson Doane; Clemens Burda
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 2.  QSAR without borders.

Authors:  Eugene N Muratov; Jürgen Bajorath; Robert P Sheridan; Igor V Tetko; Dmitry Filimonov; Vladimir Poroikov; Tudor I Oprea; Igor I Baskin; Alexandre Varnek; Adrian Roitberg; Olexandr Isayev; Stefano Curtarolo; Denis Fourches; Yoram Cohen; Alan Aspuru-Guzik; David A Winkler; Dimitris Agrafiotis; Artem Cherkasov; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 54.564

3.  QSAR modeling: where have you been? Where are you going to?

Authors:  Artem Cherkasov; Eugene N Muratov; Denis Fourches; Alexandre Varnek; Igor I Baskin; Mark Cronin; John Dearden; Paola Gramatica; Yvonne C Martin; Roberto Todeschini; Viviana Consonni; Victor E Kuz'min; Richard Cramer; Romualdo Benigni; Chihae Yang; James Rathman; Lothar Terfloth; Johann Gasteiger; Ann Richard; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Inorganic Nanoparticles for Therapeutic Delivery: Trials, Tribulations and Promise.

Authors:  Gulen Yesilbag Tonga; Daniel F Moyano; Chang Soo Kim; Vincent M Rotello
Journal:  Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 6.448

Review 5.  Imaging macrophages with nanoparticles.

Authors:  Ralph Weissleder; Matthias Nahrendorf; Mikael J Pittet
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 43.841

6.  Biomacromolecular quantitative structure-activity relationship (BioQSAR): a proof-of-concept study on the modeling, prediction and interpretation of protein-protein binding affinity.

Authors:  Peng Zhou; Congcong Wang; Feifei Tian; Yanrong Ren; Chao Yang; Jian Huang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Physicochemical signatures of nanoparticle-dependent complement activation.

Authors:  Dennis G Thomas; Satish Chikkagoudar; Alejandro Heredia-Langer; Mark F Tardiff; Zhixiang Xu; Dennis E Hourcade; Christine T N Pham; Gregory M Lanza; Kilian Q Weinberger; Nathan A Baker
Journal:  Comput Sci Discov       Date:  2014-03-21

Review 8.  Chemical basis of interactions between engineered nanoparticles and biological systems.

Authors:  Qingxin Mu; Guibin Jiang; Lingxin Chen; Hongyu Zhou; Denis Fourches; Alexander Tropsha; Bing Yan
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 9.  Toward a systematic exploration of nano-bio interactions.

Authors:  Xue Bai; Fang Liu; Yin Liu; Cong Li; Shenqing Wang; Hongyu Zhou; Wenyi Wang; Hao Zhu; David A Winkler; Bing Yan
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 4.219

10.  Predicting Nano-Bio Interactions by Integrating Nanoparticle Libraries and Quantitative Nanostructure Activity Relationship Modeling.

Authors:  Wenyi Wang; Alexander Sedykh; Hainan Sun; Linlin Zhao; Daniel P Russo; Hongyu Zhou; Bing Yan; Hao Zhu
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 15.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.