| Literature DB >> 33022215 |
Mohammad Asaduzzaman Chowdhury1, Md Bengir Ahmed Shuvho2, Md Abdus Shahid3, A K M Monjurul Haque2, Mohammod Abul Kashem4, Su Shiung Lam5, Hwai Chyuan Ong6, Md Alhaz Uddin7, M Mofijur8.
Abstract
The rapid spread of COVID-19 has led to nationwide lockdowns in many countries. The COVID-19 pandemic has played serious havoc on economic activities throughout the world. Researchers are immensely curious about how to give the best protection to people before a vaccine becomes available. The coronavirus spreads principally through saliva droplets. Thus, it would be a great opportunity if the virus spread could be controlled at an early stage. The face mask can limit virus spread from both inside and outside the mask. This is the first study that has endeavoured to explore the design and fabrication of an antiviral face mask using licorice root extract, which has antimicrobial properties due to glycyrrhetinic acid (GA) and glycyrrhizin (GL). An electrospinning process was utilized to fabricate nanofibrous membrane and virus deactivation mechanisms discussed. The nanofiber mask material was characterized by SEM and airflow rate testing. SEM results indicated that the nanofibers from electrospinning are about 15-30 μm in diameter with random porosity and orientation which have the potential to capture and kill the virus. Theoretical estimation signifies that an 85 L/min rate of airflow through the face mask is possible which ensures good breathability over an extensive range of pressure drops and pore sizes. Finally, it can be concluded that licorice root membrane may be used to produce a biobased face mask to control COVID-19 spread.Entities:
Keywords: Antiviral mask; COVID-19; Licorice root; Membrane; Nanofibers; SEM
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33022215 PMCID: PMC7532771 DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110294
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Res ISSN: 0013-9351 Impact factor: 6.498
Fig. 1Schematic diagram of the electrospinning process to produce a face mask.
Fig. 2Virus deactivation mechanism of the antiviral mask.
Fig. 3Surface morphology analysis, (a) SEM, (b) 3D surface topography, (c) Surface threshold topography and (d) particles detection.
Fig. 4Performance evaluation of the licorice membrane, (a) estimated airflow rate through the face mask with a varying pore size, (b) estimated airflow rate through the face mask against various pressure drop.