Literature DB >> 33020667

Somatic mutation distributions in cancer genomes vary with three-dimensional chromatin structure.

Kadir C Akdemir1, Victoria T Le2, Justin M Kim3,4, Sarah Killcoyne5,6, Devin A King7, Ya-Ping Lin8, Yanyan Tian9,10, Akira Inoue3, Samirkumar B Amin11, Frederick S Robinson12, Manjunath Nimmakayalu13, Rafael E Herrera7, Erica J Lynn9, Kin Chan14,15, Sahil Seth12,16, Leszek J Klimczak17, Moritz Gerstung6, Dmitry A Gordenin14, John O'Brien8, Lei Li9,18, Yonathan Lissanu Deribe3,19, Roel G Verhaak11, Peter J Campbell20, Rebecca Fitzgerald5, Ashby J Morrison7, Jesse R Dixon21, P Andrew Futreal22.   

Abstract

Somatic mutations in driver genes may ultimately lead to the development of cancer. Understanding how somatic mutations accumulate in cancer genomes and the underlying factors that generate somatic mutations is therefore crucial for developing novel therapeutic strategies. To understand the interplay between spatial genome organization and specific mutational processes, we studied 3,000 tumor-normal-pair whole-genome datasets from 42 different human cancer types. Our analyses reveal that the change in somatic mutational load in cancer genomes is co-localized with topologically-associating-domain boundaries. Domain boundaries constitute a better proxy to track mutational load change than replication timing measurements. We show that different mutational processes lead to distinct somatic mutation distributions where certain processes generate mutations in active domains, and others generate mutations in inactive domains. Overall, the interplay between three-dimensional genome organization and active mutational processes has a substantial influence on the large-scale mutation-rate variations observed in human cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33020667      PMCID: PMC8350746          DOI: 10.1038/s41588-020-0708-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Genet        ISSN: 1061-4036            Impact factor:   41.307


  49 in total

Review 1.  Somatic mutation in cancer and normal cells.

Authors:  Iñigo Martincorena; Peter J Campbell
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Deletion of DXZ4 on the human inactive X chromosome alters higher-order genome architecture.

Authors:  Emily M Darrow; Miriam H Huntley; Olga Dudchenko; Elena K Stamenova; Neva C Durand; Zhuo Sun; Su-Chen Huang; Adrian L Sanborn; Ido Machol; Muhammad Shamim; Andrew P Seberg; Eric S Lander; Brian P Chadwick; Erez Lieberman Aiden
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  The X chromosome in space.

Authors:  Teddy Jégu; Eric Aeby; Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Human mutation rate associated with DNA replication timing.

Authors:  John A Stamatoyannopoulos; Ivan Adzhubei; Robert E Thurman; Gregory V Kryukov; Sergei M Mirkin; Shamil R Sunyaev
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Differential DNA repair underlies mutation hotspots at active promoters in cancer genomes.

Authors:  Dilmi Perera; Rebecca C Poulos; Anushi Shah; Dominik Beck; John E Pimanda; Jason W H Wong
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Pybedtools: a flexible Python library for manipulating genomic datasets and annotations.

Authors:  Ryan K Dale; Brent S Pedersen; Aaron R Quinlan
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  HiCPlotter integrates genomic data with interaction matrices.

Authors:  Kadir Caner Akdemir; Lynda Chin
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 13.583

8.  The inactive X chromosome is epigenetically unstable and transcriptionally labile in breast cancer.

Authors:  Ronan Chaligné; Tatiana Popova; Marco-Antonio Mendoza-Parra; Mohamed-Ashick M Saleem; David Gentien; Kristen Ban; Tristan Piolot; Olivier Leroy; Odette Mariani; Hinrich Gronemeyer; Anne Vincent-Salomon; Marc-Henri Stern; Edith Heard
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Single-nucleus Hi-C reveals unique chromatin reorganization at oocyte-to-zygote transition.

Authors:  Ilya M Flyamer; Johanna Gassler; Maxim Imakaev; Hugo B Brandão; Sergey V Ulianov; Nezar Abdennur; Sergey V Razin; Leonid A Mirny; Kikuë Tachibana-Konwalski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Heterogeneous polymerase fidelity and mismatch repair bias genome variation and composition.

Authors:  Scott A Lujan; Anders R Clausen; Alan B Clark; Heather K MacAlpine; David M MacAlpine; Ewa P Malc; Piotr A Mieczkowski; Adam B Burkholder; David C Fargo; Dmitry A Gordenin; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 9.043

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Understanding 3D genome organization by multidisciplinary methods.

Authors:  Ivana Jerkovic; Giacomo Cavalli
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  Identification of a signature of evolutionarily conserved stress-induced mutagenesis in cancer.

Authors:  Luis H Cisneros; Charles Vaske; Kimberly J Bussey
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 3.  Role of Chromatin Modifying Complexes and Therapeutic Opportunities in Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Khyati Meghani; Lauren Folgosa Cooley; Andrea Piunti; Joshua J Meeks
Journal:  Bladder Cancer       Date:  2022-06-03

4.  Differential ETS1 binding to T:G mismatches within a CpG dinucleotide contributes to C-to-T somatic mutation rate of the IDH2 hotspot at codon Arg140.

Authors:  Jie Yang; Esha Gupta; John R Horton; Robert M Blumenthal; Xing Zhang; Xiaodong Cheng
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2022-02-26

Review 5.  Machine Learning in Epigenomics: Insights into Cancer Biology and Medicine.

Authors:  Emre Arslan; Jonathan Schulz; Kunal Rai
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 10.680

Review 6.  Anticancer drug resistance: An update and perspective.

Authors:  Ruth Nussinov; Chung-Jung Tsai; Hyunbum Jang
Journal:  Drug Resist Updat       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 18.500

Review 7.  Mutational signatures and processes in hepatobiliary cancers.

Authors:  Ekaterina Zhuravleva; Colm J O'Rourke; Jesper B Andersen
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 73.082

8.  Ultradeep sequencing differentiates patterns of skin clonal mutations associated with sun-exposure status and skin cancer burden.

Authors:  Lei Wei; Sean R Christensen; Megan E Fitzgerald; James Graham; Nicholas D Hutson; Chi Zhang; Ziyun Huang; Qiang Hu; Fenglin Zhan; Jun Xie; Jianmin Zhang; Song Liu; Eva Remenyik; Emese Gellen; Oscar R Colegio; Michael Bax; Jinhui Xu; Haifan Lin; Wendy J Huss; Barbara A Foster; Gyorgy Paragh
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 14.136

9.  Pan-Cancer Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Analyses Revealed That Hypermethylation Influences 3D Architecture and Gene Expression Dysregulation in HOXA Locus During Carcinogenesis of Cancers.

Authors:  Gang Liu; Zhenhao Liu; Xiaomeng Sun; Xiaoqiong Xia; Yunhe Liu; Lei Liu
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-03-18

10.  Reverting to single-cell biology: The predictions of the atavism theory of cancer.

Authors:  Kimberly J Bussey; Paul C W Davies
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2021-08-08       Impact factor: 3.667

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.